It was intended as a potential transfer - I believed it likely succeeded -
but explicitly didn't care if it failed
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 20:44 Cuddle Beam wrote:
> (not really slang but like non-explicit language in general : P )
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
>> It
(not really slang but like non-explicit language in general : P )
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> It feels a bit like a game of Limbo with slang lol. How slang can you go!-
> before it becomes non-gamestate.
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> I’
It feels a bit like a game of Limbo with slang lol. How slang can you go!-
before it becomes non-gamestate.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I’ve accounted for it as one, on the premise that “insert” is a fairly
> obvious synonym for “give” in this context, and that there’
I’ve accounted for it as one, on the premise that “insert” is a fairly obvious
synonym for “give” in this context, and that there’s exactly one thing that can
both own shinies and receive trust tokens that the noun “ATM” could reasonably
refer to.
Want to CFJ it? I don’t, but I’ll provide evide
Is this a shiny transfer?
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> Insert 1 Shiny into the recently registered ATM.
>
> I give ATM a trust token.
5 matches
Mail list logo
