Thanks :).
Jason Cobb
On 7/22/19 9:29 PM, Rebecca wrote:
Notice of honour
-1 nch for taking my honour for dumb reasons
+1 Jason Cobb for being a cool new playing dude
On 7/22/19 2:06 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
On 7/21/19 7:26 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: >>The FRC had a rule that
the player who gained the most style points in
the previous round was the Wizard, and other players had to refer to
them only as the Wizard (using any other name would end up
On 7/21/19 7:26 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:> The FRC had a rule
that the player who gained the most style points in
the previous round was the Wizard, and other players had to refer to
them only as the Wizard (using any other name would end up giving you a
penalty within the game, so the
On Monday, July 22, 2019 2:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/21/2019 7:01 PM,ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> > Agora used to be exclusively bottom-posted, but there was an influx of
> > new players a while back whose email clients top-posted by default and
> > it's lead to a mix of quoting
On 7/21/2019 7:01 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
Agora used to be exclusively bottom-posted, but there was an influx of
new players a while back whose email clients top-posted by default and
it's lead to a mix of quoting styles being used.
It's really terrible IMO. Bottom-posting for
On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 21:54 -0400, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 7/21/19 9:26 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> > (Ugh, I hate top-posting threads, but it's too late to reverse this
> > now.)
>
> I'm sorry, what's a "top-posting thread" and why is it bad?
It's down to how the nested quotes of the
Ah, got it. Although I think I prefer to see the new content at the top
- I can always look back in my email to see the context.
Jason Cobb
On 7/21/19 9:56 PM, Rebecca wrote:
he's just talking about email technology. some clients by default put the
previous emails in the thread below the
he's just talking about email technology. some clients by default put the
previous emails in the thread below the email (like gmail) and some others
put them above. i _could_ edit it to make it above but i prefer just
clicking send, sorry xD
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:54 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
>
I'm sorry, what's a "top-posting thread" and why is it bad?
Jason Cobb
On 7/21/19 9:26 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
(Ugh, I hate top-posting threads, but it's too late to reverse this
now.)
(Ugh, I hate top-posting threads, but it's too late to reverse this
now.)
Arguably, nomics' best rules are those that don't really do anything.
The FRC had a rule that the player who gained the most style points in
the previous round was the Wizard, and other players had to refer to
them only as
Well it's fine as is, surely one of our best rules imo
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:40 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd be opposed to that. People might start bribing others for Karma,
> which defeats the purpose of the system.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019
I'd be opposed to that. People might start bribing others for Karma,
which defeats the purpose of the system.
-Aris
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 4:37 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
> Very much worth keeping imo, but maybe it should have consequences like a
> win at some point - once a year maybe?
>
> On Mon,
Very much worth keeping imo, but maybe it should have consequences like a
win at some point - once a year maybe?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:25 AM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I actually rather like the system, it's just hard to remember to do
> anything with it. It's also sometimes difficult to find
I like the system too. I think it might be more fun if we made it very
slightly more game relevant. I had an idea for that a little while
ago:
Once every X period, the Shogun can issue a memorandum, stipulating
recommendations for the good of the good of the game (e SHOULD not use
this for eir
14 matches
Mail list logo
