DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Decriminalization
On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:24 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: Proto-Proposal: Decriminalization (AI = 2, please) Create a rule titled Decriminalization with Power 2 and this text: If a rule defines a method of breaching it as decriminalized, then no person SHALL initiate a criminal case alleging that that rule has been breached by that method, unless the defendant intended to breach it by that method by performing the alleged action. There's potential here for recursion -- file a criminal case over R2158, then counter-file a criminal case over Decriminalization. How about this instead? If a rule defines a method of breaching it as decriminalized, then a judgement of UNIMPUGNED shall be appropriate for a criminal case alleging that that rule has been breached by that method when the defendant did not demonstrate a clear intent to breach that rule by performing the alleged action. And how DO you get the rule paragraph margins properly double-indented? - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Decriminalization
OscarMeyr wrote: There's potential here for recursion -- file a criminal case over R2158, then counter-file a criminal case over Decriminalization. That's the whole point. And how DO you get the rule paragraph margins properly double-indented? Hmm?
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Decriminalization
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: OscarMeyr wrote: There's potential here for recursion -- file a criminal case over R2158, then counter-file a criminal case over Decriminalization. That's the whole point. Well okay, if you want to make that a feature. And how DO you get the rule paragraph margins properly double- indented? Hmm? Your email has the proposed rule in proper Agoran formatting with the left margin indented, and the right margin wrapping at the proper column. There's probably some formatting elements in my mail program that can do the same thing. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Decriminalization
OscarMeyr wrote: On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: OscarMeyr wrote: There's potential here for recursion -- file a criminal case over R2158, then counter-file a criminal case over Decriminalization. That's the whole point. Well okay, if you want to make that a feature. Yeah, the idea is to escalate from you SHOULD NOT try to ding a judge for a good-faith error but you SHALL NOT try etc.. And how DO you get the rule paragraph margins properly double- indented? Hmm? Your email has the proposed rule in proper Agoran formatting with the left margin indented, and the right margin wrapping at the proper column. There's probably some formatting elements in my mail program that can do the same thing. Right margin is standard, left margin is me doing it manually (usually starting by copy+pasting from the ruleset).