On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> ATMunn wrote:
>
> > > 8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act
> > PRESENT, what's this about?
>
> As I understand it, V.J. Rada returned to the game in the middle of
> being auctioned as a zombie, and was/is currently unable to stop
ATMunn wrote:
8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act
PRESENT, what's this about?
As I understand it, V.J. Rada returned to the game in the middle of
being auctioned as a zombie, and was/is currently unable to stop the
auction from finishing and the winner from pilfering eir
Ah, I see. Never mind, then.
On 11/11/2018 09:17 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in an amendment is ignored, so the proposal still works.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11,
On 11/11/2018 08:52 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs
FOR. Trigon, this is one of the most beautiful changes I've seen since
I became a player. I'm not sure why I find it so elegant, but I do.
There's a typo ("lefy" instead of "levy"), but it's Rule
5 matches
Mail list logo
