On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> You mean it would never pass? It wasn't obvious to me. Anyhow one could
> always just
> declare someone speaker.
> -Aris
It could pass if e convinces or bribes enough people that e'd be a good speaker,
it's a scam if e's got a trick that would give
> On Sep 17, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> Proposal: Voting Strength Fix (AI=1)
> {{{
This looks pretty good overall. I like the generalization of voting strength.
However, I believe this proposal will be ineffective with AI=1 - several of the
rules amended
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:25 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The first bit seems fine. The second bit though... Okay, I don't really
> know the precedent on this, but it seems like a fairly minor thing to have
> someone win over. I mean if someone fixes a
The first bit seems fine. The second bit though... Okay, I don't really
know the precedent on this, but it seems like a fairly minor thing to have
someone win over. I mean if someone fixes a game-braking error, or even a
major one, that makes sense. But this doesn't even break anything. It just
4 matches
Mail list logo