Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:43 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote: I understood that. To clarify: How soon after a player CFJs is the CFJ typically listed on the CotC page? When Murphy

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-05 Thread Kyle Marek-Spartz
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: I CFJ on the following

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-05 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:27 -0500, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: What is the usual turn around time on CFJs being listed on the CotC page? It varies a lot. CFJs have been turned around within a few minutes before; sometimes they take several weeks. (Even over a month on occasion, if the CotC's slow

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-05 Thread Kyle Marek-Spartz
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:27 -0500, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: What is the usual turn around time on CFJs being listed on the CotC page? It varies a lot. CFJs have been turned around within a few minutes before; sometimes they

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-05 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:27 -0500, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: What is the usual turn around time on CFJs being listed on the CotC page? It

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-05 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:43 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote: I understood that. To clarify: How soon after a player CFJs is the CFJ typically listed on the CotC page? When Murphy sees the message and updates his

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-04 Thread Quazie
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104. Original ruleset defined games as

DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years. I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104. Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one when someone won, and someone indeed did

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-03 Thread Kyle Marek-Spartz
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years. I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104. Original ruleset defined games

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104. Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one when someone won, and someone indeed did in the first year or so. On a related note, here's a question: how many here

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years. I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two Actions

2009-06-03 Thread Paul VanKoughnett
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104. Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one when someone won, and someone indeed did