Re: DIS: Re: BUS: criminal behavior
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 2:50 PM James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 22:27, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-business wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:06 PM nch via agora-business > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 6/10/20 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > > > > > > > I ossify Agora. > > > > > > > I point my finger at G. for Faking. At least one person believed e had > > > ossified Agora, and acted on it. > > > > > > > > > > I find this finger pointing to be valid; I impose the Cold Hand of > > Justice by levying an unforgivable fine of 1 blot on G. because this > > was clearly intentional but inconsequential. However, as a result of > > this, I believe that any attempt to impose a fine for the Indictment > > would be INEFFECTIVE because it is the same conduct for which e is > > being fined here. In other words, the plot thickens. > > I'm not convinced it was made with the intent to mislead. It looked to > me like an obvious attempt to test DADA with an action that doesn't > actually do anything. > > So now we have a buggy indictment process and a lesser fine which may > or may not have been successfully levied and so may or may not block > the indictment process from leading to a fine. > > - Falsifian The appropriate means to appeal would be to CFJ on whether my fine was EFFECTIVE. If it were found to be INEFFECTIVE, we would then fine em through the Indictment, but I've realized that the Indictment process probably still has to occur even though the fine at the end couldn't be imposed.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: criminal behavior
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:50 AM James Cook via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 22:27, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-business wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:06 PM nch via agora-business > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 6/10/20 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > > > > > > > I ossify Agora. > > > > > > > I point my finger at G. for Faking. At least one person believed e had > > > ossified Agora, and acted on it. > > > > > > > > > > I find this finger pointing to be valid; I impose the Cold Hand of > > Justice by levying an unforgivable fine of 1 blot on G. because this > > was clearly intentional but inconsequential. However, as a result of > > this, I believe that any attempt to impose a fine for the Indictment > > would be INEFFECTIVE because it is the same conduct for which e is > > being fined here. In other words, the plot thickens. > > I'm not convinced it was made with the intent to mislead. It looked to > me like an obvious attempt to test DADA with an action that doesn't > actually do anything. > > So now we have a buggy indictment process and a lesser fine which may > or may not have been successfully levied and so may or may not block > the indictment process from leading to a fine. > What I really like about Agora is that Agorans keep everything so simple. Gameplay is so concrete and grounded, and the players tale a common sense approach to the game, avoiding complexities such as hypotheticals and paradoxes. ;) -Aris
DIS: Re: BUS: criminal behavior
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 22:27, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:06 PM nch via agora-business > wrote: > > > > > > On 6/10/20 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > > > > > I ossify Agora. > > > > > I point my finger at G. for Faking. At least one person believed e had > > ossified Agora, and acted on it. > > > > > > I find this finger pointing to be valid; I impose the Cold Hand of > Justice by levying an unforgivable fine of 1 blot on G. because this > was clearly intentional but inconsequential. However, as a result of > this, I believe that any attempt to impose a fine for the Indictment > would be INEFFECTIVE because it is the same conduct for which e is > being fined here. In other words, the plot thickens. I'm not convinced it was made with the intent to mislead. It looked to me like an obvious attempt to test DADA with an action that doesn't actually do anything. So now we have a buggy indictment process and a lesser fine which may or may not have been successfully levied and so may or may not block the indictment process from leading to a fine. - Falsifian
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: criminal behavior
*ever On 6/10/2020 9:46 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: not sure three words have never made me laugh more On 6/10/2020 5:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: I ossify Agora.
DIS: Re: BUS: criminal behavior
not sure three words have never made me laugh more On 6/10/2020 5:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: I ossify Agora.
DIS: Re: BUS: criminal behavior
On 6/10/2020 3:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:06 PM nch wrote: >> On 6/10/20 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >>> >>> I ossify Agora. >>> >> I point my finger at G. for Faking. At least one person believed e had >> ossified Agora, and acted on it. >> >> > > I find this finger pointing to be valid; I impose the Cold Hand of > Justice by levying an unforgivable fine of 1 blot on G. because this > was clearly intentional but inconsequential. However, as a result of > this, I believe that any attempt to impose a fine for the Indictment > would be INEFFECTIVE because it is the same conduct for which e is > being fined here. In other words, the plot thickens. > lol. I wasn't going to comment for a bit and am reserving my defense, but the fact that punishment for an obvious lie prevents punishment for a failed ossification is hilarious (and somewhat just, actually - an accidental plea bargain).
