Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929

2017-10-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 20:20 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > > pool. > > not-technically-a-CoE: The ID numbers listed

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929

2017-10-16 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 20:20 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. not-technically-a-CoE: The ID numbers listed in the summary at the start and in the proposal

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929

2017-10-15 Thread VJ Rada
also, nttpf On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:41 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > "The problem here is that deregistration without objection isn’t > cuddlebeam-proof." > > I think you mean everyone-proof! Omd and Murphy can't be deregistered > rn and that's 1/10 of the whole Supply level right

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929

2017-10-15 Thread VJ Rada
"The problem here is that deregistration without objection isn’t cuddlebeam-proof." I think you mean everyone-proof! Omd and Murphy can't be deregistered rn and that's 1/10 of the whole Supply level right there. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > >> On

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929

2017-10-15 Thread Gaelan Steele
> On Oct 15, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the