DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sep 20, 2014, at 5:12 PM, Alex Smith wrote: I issue a Yellow Card to Warrigal for failing to publish the IADoP's report last week, violating Rule 2143. (Warrigal, please do your duty and publish it this week. I know you're aware you're IADoP; you said so in your last report. And a missing IADoP report makes it hard for me to figure out who I'm supposed to be penalizing, as well as making it hard to recover from a lack of officers.) I apologize. I've been pretty busy lately; I'll get to it as soon as I can. Hopefully within the next couple of days. —the Warrigal
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Tanner Swett wrote: I intend to cause Rule 2138 The Interstellar Associate Director of Personnel to amend itself by replacing Interstellar with Intermittent. I do so. (Henri and Roujo support; nobody objects.) —the Warrigal
DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 05:15 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: There are six other offices; two are empty, Henri holds the other four, and all are missing reports. My report crossed with Henri's (meaning that I guess I've violated the rules in a trivial manner), but this means that we now have six vacant offices, and they're six of the seven that have reports. This is something of a major crisis, AFAICT. I'm going to blame it on the lack of an economy (which in turn is due to the lack of Scorekeepor reports, which is due to a bug). Perhaps we need interim proposals to reduce recordkeepor load just to survive when we're so low on officers. Apart from that, our main hope is to rely on revitalizing the economy, and/or the usual spate of September registrations (which may or may not happen; we should make sure we have the website /very/ up to date over the next few days in order to increase the chance it does). -- ais523
DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: omd, you have to publish the Rulekeepor report today (is it on a cron job, btw?) It ought to be. Sadly, it's not.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: I issue a Green Card to scshunt, for breaching rule 2143 by publishing an inaccurate Scorekeepor report. Green, because the mistake was quickly caught and mostly inconsequential, and seems to have been an honest mistake. I cannot issue a second card to scshunt, but I would for a failure to publish the Herald report last week (e deputised for it, pushing emself into the role, and I haven't noticed em resigning it). IADoP, Rulekeepor, Scorekeepor, you have the rest of today to publish your reports. Make sure you get them in on time! Awarded penalties thus far under the current system (nothing requires me to officially track these, AFAICT, but people may be interested): Henri: R G.: G Murphy: G omd: R scshunt: G -- ais523 Did you forget the Promotor's inaccurate distribution? -Henri
DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: I issue a Green Card to scshunt, for breaching rule 2143 by publishing an inaccurate Scorekeepor report. Green, because the mistake was quickly caught and mostly inconsequential, and seems to have been an honest mistake. I cannot issue a second card to scshunt, but I would for a failure to publish the Herald report last week (e deputised for it, pushing emself into the role, and I haven't noticed em resigning it). As previously mentioned, Herald is monthly. -scshunt
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 01:44 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote: On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: I issue a Green Card to scshunt, for breaching rule 2143 by publishing an inaccurate Scorekeepor report. Green, because the mistake was quickly caught and mostly inconsequential, and seems to have been an honest mistake. I cannot issue a second card to scshunt, but I would for a failure to publish the Herald report last week (e deputised for it, pushing emself into the role, and I haven't noticed em resigning it). As previously mentioned, Herald is monthly. Ah right. I take solace in the fact that so far, on each occasion when I've blamed someone for something they didn't actually commit, I didn't actually give em a Card for it. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Sean Hunt wrote: Incidentally, campaign speech for Herald: I will continue to clean up mistakes made by G. when e was Herald, as well as mistakes made by myself. All candidates are incompetent. IIRC, the list of Patent Titles has not been ratified since at least 2002, when I first held the job. It is probably the oldest record uncertainty in the game. I once awarded a missed Patent Title two years late (original fault wasn't mine I don't think). If elected, I swear to never ratify the thing so it remains an indefinitely uncertain, but also indefinitely living document. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Jun 15, 2014 12:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Sean Hunt wrote: Incidentally, campaign speech for Herald: I will continue to clean up mistakes made by G. when e was Herald, as well as mistakes made by myself. All candidates are incompetent. IIRC, the list of Patent Titles has not been ratified since at least 2002, when I first held the job. It is probably the oldest record uncertainty in the game. I once awarded a missed Patent Title two years late (original fault wasn't mine I don't think). If elected, I swear to never ratify the thing so it remains an indefinitely uncertain, but also indefinitely living document. -G. I concur. Actually, I think the date last ratified is missing. -scshunt
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Jun 15, 2014 1:31 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Sean Hunt wrote: I concur. Actually, I think the date last ratified is missing. I remember researching that back when I did the 2-year correction. I'll see if I've got notes somewhere. It's possible I misspoke. Thinking about it, the Report as a whole may have been ratified one one of the many times when the Herald was tracking a currency. -G. IIRC Assets only ratified the asset portion of the report. -scshunt
DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Alex Smith wrote: H. Herald, do you intend to continue tracking the list of Fugitives, or should I do it now that the office of Referee exists? (To players who are unaware, the list of Fugitives covers the list of all persons who dodged a penalty, under any of Agora's many historical penalty rules, by deregistering, and have not since returned and made up for their crimes. The list is unofficial but has been tracked for ages, and such persons are sometimes given penalties under newly introduced penalty systems via proposal.) FWIW, When I've been Herald, if they've been gone longer than a few months, I've only ever asked em to tell eir story if they remember it, then hit em with a wet noodle and take em off the list. Probably happened about three times. -G.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] This Week's Penalties
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: H. Herald, do you intend to continue tracking the list of Fugitives, or should I do it now that the office of Referee exists? (To players who are unaware, the list of Fugitives covers the list of all persons who dodged a penalty, under any of Agora's many historical penalty rules, by deregistering, and have not since returned and made up for their crimes. The list is unofficial but has been tracked for ages, and such persons are sometimes given penalties under newly introduced penalty systems via proposal.) I have no preference either way. Incidentally, campaign speech for Herald: I will continue to clean up mistakes made by G. when e was Herald, as well as mistakes made by myself. All candidates are incompetent. -scshunt
