DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500 (Weekly Report)

2020-04-26 Thread Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 15:00, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-official wrote: > Trigon -400c. 2020-02-09 19:18 Transfer from Murphy > ("Kingmaking") > Murphy +400c. 2020-02-09 19:18 Transfer to Trigon > ("Kingmaking") > These appear to be backwards, though I thi

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-10-20 Thread James Cook
Unofficial correction to the below report: CuddleBeam and Walker were zombies at the time it was published, so should have been listed in the Zombie section. On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 03:36, James Cook wrote: > > >

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-08-05 Thread Rebecca
I note that G can also now win by coins On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:19 PM James Cook wrote: > > Forbes 500 > > > Date of th

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500 (revised)

2019-06-19 Thread Rebecca
It wasn't a claim of error, so don't claim money for this! On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 4:06 PM James Cook wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 01:16, Jason Cobb wrote: > > This is wrong, but I don't know if it counts because it is in a purely > > informational section: > > > > > Jason Cobb + 2c.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-06-12 Thread James Cook
The below report is also missing D. Margaux's 2019-06-03 reward, but it won't self-ratify because it's already CoE-ed. The "fresh" report at [0] already includes the update. [0] https://agoranomic.org/Treasuror/reports/weekly/fresh.txt On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 01:59, James Cook wrote: > > I publis

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500 (revised)

2019-06-10 Thread Rebecca
isn't it 1000 bucks to win the game? why has marg...not done that. On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:48 AM James Cook wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 08:39, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > CoE: Balloons, Favours, Spaceships and Energy are not currently defined > by the Rules. > > > > (Also, I think D. Ma

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-02-18 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I diagnose pressing Fn+S instead of Ctrl+S. :P Fixed for the next report. I think the intended meaning is obvious enough that nothing unpleasant self-ratifies. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, February 18, 2019 7:18 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > "34    CuddleBeams": First time I'v

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-02-18 Thread Cuddle Beam
"34CuddleBeams": First time I've been referred to as CuddlebeamS (I think all of my Agoran aliases so far are Cuddlebeam, CuddleBeam and Cuddle Beam, lol) I don't know if that's a big enough issue to CoE or not. On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:13 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Date of this weekly

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-01-15 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
You're correct, I do apologise. I will publish a revision shortly. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, January 14, 2019 9:57 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > Ah, I just saw that you also noticed it before I did. I do have a > legitimate CoE though: I collected a reward for the Rulekeep

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-01-14 Thread Reuben Staley
But the Assessor hasn't resolved the proposals that would create Clork and Astronomor yet. This isn't a CoE because that section is not self ratifying but it's still worth pointing out. -- Trigon On Mon, Jan 14, 2019, 14:33 Timon Walshe-Grey Date of this weekly report: 2019-01-14 > Date of last

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2019-01-14 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
On Monday, January 14, 2019 9:32 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > >Asset class Recordkeepor Ownership >--- - >Coins Treasuror (twg)Agora, players, contracts >Balloons Clork (twg)Players >Favours

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2018-05-03 Thread Ned Strange
This isn't a Notice, no reasons specified. On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: > Oh, I must've missed that message. Oops. Either way, thanks for this > deputization. > > Notice of Honour: +1 Corona; -1 Telnaior > > On Thu, May 3, 2018, 13:09 Corona wrote: > >> Sorry, G. judged t

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2018-05-03 Thread Corona
(Or you can vote for entering the judgement into moot if you want) ~Corona On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Corona wrote: > Sorry, G. judged that pa​ying without recipient doesn't mean transferring > to anyone but it means destruction (see below), so you didn't pay (you > would have attempted to

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2018-05-03 Thread Corona
Sorry, G. judged that pa​ying without recipient doesn't mean transferring to anyone but it means destruction (see below), so you didn't pay (you would have attempted to transfer to Aris, right?) I'm for a proposal to give you the farm back. Oh heck, if there's a time for a political power play in

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2018-05-03 Thread Reuben Staley
Where's my farm though? I"paid" upkeep to the best of my ability. On Thu, May 3, 2018, 10:52 Corona wrote: > I deputize for the Treasuror to post the following report. Please check > your actions and balances. > > > > > +---++++---+++++

DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

2018-05-03 Thread Corona
​​ ​Looks like I didn't send that message ​in a monospaced font. Those affected could peruse this table: +---++++---+++++++ |Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| +---+++