Murphy wrote:
What if the CFJ is called:
These are interesting questions. But I think the first thing is
for the Speaker (or whomever is the vote-counter) to set a personal
precedent: "I won't accept that vote because I can't reasonably
figure it out." This is a flexible precedent and not
Goethe wrote:
Murphy wrote:
* Is the Pineapple Partnership a player?
yes -> Quazie voted AGAINST, VI = 3/4, voters = 7
no-> Quazie voted FOR, VI = 4/3, voters = 7
indeterminate -> Quazie did not vote (condition in Rule 2127
paragraph 2
Murphy wrote:
* Is the Pineapple Partnership a player?
yes -> Quazie voted AGAINST, VI = 3/4, voters = 7
no-> Quazie voted FOR, VI = 4/3, voters = 7
indeterminate -> Quazie did not vote (condition in Rule 2127
paragraph 2 was not met),
3 matches
Mail list logo
