> On Mar 12, 2024, at 5:49 PM, nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
> of the arguments there.
>
> I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
> an "unambiguous and clear specification of the
On 3/13/24 16:16, Janet Cobb wrote:
> On 3/12/24 18:48, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>> This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
>> of the arguments there.
>>
>> I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
>> an "unambiguous and clear
On 3/12/24 18:48, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
> of the arguments there.
>
> I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
> an "unambiguous and clear specification of the method to be used for
>
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 10:48 PM, nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
> of the arguments there.
>
> I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
> an "unambiguous and clear specification of the
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 3:49 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
> of the arguments there.
>
> I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
> an "unambiguous and
This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all
of the arguments there.
I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires
an "unambiguous and clear specification of the method to be used for
changing the rule". For rule changes in proposals, what would
6 matches
Mail list logo