On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 10:11 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> because G. is not a player
Or rather, because G. IS a player. (Unless e surreptitiously deregistered
recently, I suppose. Stranger things have happened.)
-twg
Again, as a matter of style, should we prefer "Judgement" or "Judgment"?
My spellchecker complains about the first one, and it appears that
"Judgment" is more accepted as correct. The Rules use both, although
they only use "Judgment" (no e) twice, that being in Rule 2479
("Official Justice"),
Rule 2531 ("Referee Accountability") has higher power than Rule 2479
("Official Justice"), so all of the former's requirements apply to
Summary Judgment. However, the entire point of Summary Judgment is that
it doesn't need to have a reason to be applied.
Thus I submit for comment this
On 7/3/2019 8:50 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
Again, as a matter of style, should we prefer "Judgement" or "Judgment"? My >
spellchecker complains about the first one, and it appears that "Judgment"
is more accepted as correct. The Rules use both, although they only use
"Judgment" (no e) twice,
I'm using the Thunderbird spellchecker, and it yells at me for
"Judgement"...
Jason Cobb
On 7/3/19 12:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 7/3/2019 8:50 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
Again, as a matter of style, should we prefer "Judgement" or
"Judgment"? My > spellchecker complains about the first one,
But that not withstanding, I support using the same format in CFJ
archives, and I think it's a good idea to have consistency between the
CFJ archives and the Rules, so I'll just use "Judgement" from now on.
Jason Cobb
On 7/3/19 12:38 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I'm using the Thunderbird
On 7/3/2019 9:38 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I'm using the Thunderbird spellchecker, and it yells at me for "Judgement"...
Jason Cobb
Weird! Mine is a relatively fresh vanilla install (in the U.S. if it auto-
detects such things in settings) and I'm pretty sure I didn't manually add
it.
Interesting. It most likely delegates to some sort of OS setting.
Anyway, I just manually added it to my system.
Jason Cobb
On 7/3/19 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 7/3/2019 9:38 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I'm using the Thunderbird spellchecker, and it yells at me for
"Judgement"...
Jason
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:42 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> So would I face prejudice if I were to open the exact same CFJs again
> later once we actually get CHoJ fixed?
Fine by me.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 04:12, Jason Cobb wrote:
> Also, was the Ritual performed last week?
No, I don't think so.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 04:15, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Your proposal numbers have some off-by-100 errors.
Whoops! Revised votes below.
> >> IDAuthor(s) AITitle
> >> ---
> >> 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian
11 matches
Mail list logo
