On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 04:15, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
> Your proposal numbers have some off-by-100 errors.

Whoops! Revised votes below.

> >> ID    Author(s)              AI    Title
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 8196  Jason Cobb, Falsifian  1.7   Perfecting pledges (v1.2)

I vote AGAINST Proposal 8196.

> >> 8197  G.                     none  no power is all powerful

If I can vote on Proposal 8197, I vote AGAINST it.

I note that the my votes in the rest of the quoted message seem to
have had the correct proposal numbers.

> >> 8198  Jason Cobb             1.0   Be gone, foul demon!
> > I vote FOR Proposal 8198.
> >
> >> 8199  Jason Cobb             3.0   Fixing instant runoff
> >
> > I vote AGAINST Proposal 8199.
> >
> >> 8200  Aris, G.               3.0   Sane AI Defaulting
> >
> > On Proposal 8200, I vote conditionally: AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has
> > been published specifying any provision within Proposal 8200, otherwise
> > FOR.
> >
> >> 8201  Aris                   3.0   Just Make Them Write It Out
> >
> > On Proposal 8201, I vote conditionally: AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has
> > been published specifying any provision within Proposal 8201, otherwise
> > FOR.
> >

Reply via email to