On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 04:15, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > Your proposal numbers have some off-by-100 errors.
Whoops! Revised votes below. > >> ID Author(s) AI Title > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.7 Perfecting pledges (v1.2) I vote AGAINST Proposal 8196. > >> 8197 G. none no power is all powerful If I can vote on Proposal 8197, I vote AGAINST it. I note that the my votes in the rest of the quoted message seem to have had the correct proposal numbers. > >> 8198 Jason Cobb 1.0 Be gone, foul demon! > > I vote FOR Proposal 8198. > > > >> 8199 Jason Cobb 3.0 Fixing instant runoff > > > > I vote AGAINST Proposal 8199. > > > >> 8200 Aris, G. 3.0 Sane AI Defaulting > > > > On Proposal 8200, I vote conditionally: AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has > > been published specifying any provision within Proposal 8200, otherwise > > FOR. > > > >> 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out > > > > On Proposal 8201, I vote conditionally: AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has > > been published specifying any provision within Proposal 8201, otherwise > > FOR. > >