Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Do we need all 3?

2022-07-07 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 18:56 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 7/5/22 13:59, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > > > > Repeal Rule 2618 (Promises). > > > > Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts). > > > > Repeal Rule 2450 (Pledges). > > > They all serve different purposes and are

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Do we need all 3?

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/5/22 13:59, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > I don't think we do. Let's discuss some options. > > I submit the following proposal: > > { > Title: Option A > Adoption index: 2.2 > Author: secretsnail > Co-authors: > > Repeal Rule 2618 (Promises). > > } > > I submit the following

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 5:56 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/7/22 01:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > > That is, fulfilling these requirements in order to take the action by > announcement IS performing the action "with support",

DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/7/22 01:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > That is, fulfilling these requirements in order to take the action by > announcement IS performing the action "with support", making it a tabled > action. The same applies to all tabled action methods. > So what's left to answer is if

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > > As it has no mentions of the rules, I didn't think it was necessary to > > include an interpretation where a tabled action must

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/8/22 00:03, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: >>> As it has no mentions of the rules, I didn't think it was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Do we need all 3?

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/7/22 19:04, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 18:56 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion > wrote: >> On 7/5/22 13:59, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: >>> Repeal Rule 2618 (Promises). >>> >>> Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts). >>> >>> Repeal Rule 2450 (Pledges).

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:07 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/8/22 00:03, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < > > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > >> On

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > As it has no mentions of the rules, I didn't think it was necessary to > include an interpretation where a tabled action must be rules-defined as an > action able to be performed with one of those methods. But looking at Rule > 2125