Re-reading the rules it seems that my first point only applies to the
objections part, the rest is clear.
Hi,
I was reading the rules before registering and came across something I
didn't understand, I hope you guys can clarify this for me (I was going
to propose some change for the first part, but then I might be the only
one who doesn't understand this).
First, we have objections, consent
Ah, I see now, double negatives (approximate term) confuse me. Thanks!
El 13/02/2020 a las 13:24, AIS523--- via agora-discussion escribió:
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 12:40 +0100, sukil via agora-discussion wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the rules before registering and came across something
I didn't
El 13/02/2020 a las 13:24, AIS523--- via agora-discussion escribió:
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 12:40 +0100, sukil via agora-discussion wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the rules before registering and came across something
I didn't understand, I hope you guys can clarify this for me (I was
going
El 13/02/2020 a las 17:37, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business escribió:
Aris wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:09 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
Happy birthday! I grant Falsifian 3 coins.
Likewise!
So do I!
-tw
Me too!
El 13/02/2020 a las 17:56, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion escribió:
sukil wrote:
Me too!
Hi sukil, welcome to Agora! You sent this to the main Discussion Forum
(agora-discussion@agoranomic.org), whereas you probably meant to send it
to the main Public Forum
(Slightly deviating from the topic, but it appears first on r1728): any
reason why point 3 of this rule says "an integer multiple of 0.1 with a
minimum of 1"? Maybe I'm being super pedantic here, but integers don't
have anything after the decimal point, so why not just use number or
real
El 25/02/2020 a las 16:42, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion escribió:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 10:39, sukil via agora-discussion
wrote:
(Slightly deviating from the topic, but it appears first on r1728): any
reason why point 3 of this rule says "an integer multiple of 0.1 with a
minimum
El 27/02/2020 a las 11:40, AIS523--- via agora-discussion escribió:
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 11:22 +0100, sukil via agora-discussion wrote:
El 26/02/2020 a las 15:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-business escribió:
I vote as follows, and act on behalf of o to vote as follows:
You bet I'm
El 26/02/2020 a las 15:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-business escribió:
I vote as follows, and act on behalf of o to vote as follows:
You bet I'm not thrilled to contest G on this, but I'm rather confused.
I'm reading through the rules, and I come accross R2506, which ssays
that a zombie's
Woops, that should be interpreted as present, yes. Fixing by sending
that to public forum, thanks.
El 14/02/2020 a las 16:30, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion escribió:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 07:31, sukil via agora-business
wrote:
8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
Did
El 18/02/2020 a las 8:52, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion escribió:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:48 PM sukil via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
El 18/02/2020 a las 1:49, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business escribió:
Alexis wrote:
I point a finger at
El 18/02/2020 a las 1:49, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business escribió:
Alexis wrote:
I point a finger at myself for failing to appoint a Speaker in a timely fashion.
Oh good grief, I'm not _that_ disappointed - just found it ironic that
I'd been narrowly beaten to Speaker twice in short
Hi,
For some reason, any agora-* conversation (tested with my register
message, a random one coming from agora-official and another one coming
from this list) includes a reply-to header which points to this list,
and excludes any other agora-* list. This means that I should always
"reply to
El 14/02/2020 a las 18:08, AIS523--- via agora-discussion escribió:
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 18:02 +0100, sukil via agora-discussion wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, any agora-* conversation (tested with my register
message, a random one coming from agora-official and another one coming
from
El 14/02/2020 a las 18:06, James Cook escribió:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 13:06, sukil via agora-discussion
wrote:
El 13/02/2020 a las 13:24, AIS523--- via agora-discussion escribió:
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 12:40 +0100, sukil via agora-discussion wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the rules before
El 19/02/2020 a las 22:40, Cuddle Beam via agora-business escribió:
I don't find this overly obscure, because it's fairly easily readable.
This is normal English, but in a cool font. It says "Judicial Jocularity
Act".
"Judicial Jocularity Act" and "풥퓊풹풾풸풾풶퓁 풥표풸퓊퓁풶퓇풾퓉퓎 풜풸퓉"
are the same thing
El 07/03/2020 a las 17:48, James Cook via agora-discussion escribió:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 13:12, sukil via agora-business
wrote:
El 01/03/2020 a las 5:53, James Cook via agora-business escribió:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 15:14, sukil via agora-business
wrote:
I intend to clean, as stated by
18 matches
Mail list logo
