I apologize, what's going on? I'm new.
On 4/22/14 at 1:10am, Pavitra wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > AGAINST. Under current rule allowing vacancy grabbing, makes for
> > trivial wins with a race.
>
> Worse, it's possible to win arbitrarily many times in the same message
On 4/22/14 at 7:33pm, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Ãrjan Johansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote:
> >> I apologize, what's going on? I'm new.
> > They're voting on a proposal for fixing a bug in one of the rules for
On 4/23/14 at 4:11pm, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:34 PM, x1122334455 wrote:
> > I register
>
> Well, it looks like hazing isn't a crime anymore so... I CFJ on
> x1122334455, putting forth tradition as my main argument.
>
> Also: Welcome!
On 4/24/14 at 7:52am, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 23/4/14, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> >
> > > Well, it looks like hazing isn't a crime anymore so... I CFJ on
> > > x1122334455, putting forth tra
On 4/23/14 at 4:11pm, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:34 PM, x1122334455 wrote:
> > I register
>
> Well, it looks like hazing isn't a crime anymore so... I CFJ on
> x1122334455, putting forth tradition as my main argument.
>
> Also: Welcome
On 4/24/14 at 10:03am, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote:
> > On 4/24/14 at 7:52am, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 23/4/14, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> > > >
&g
On 4/24/14 at 12:39pm, Alex Smith wrote:
> Yahoo! mangled the Promotor's message so badly
> I'm not even going to attempt to quote it; but I vote as follows:
>
> 7632 PRESENT
> 7633 FOR; I like this compromise
> 7634 PRESENT
> 7635 AGAINST; historically, such rules have been mostly
> pointless e
On 4/24/14 at 10:47pm, Fool wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 09:41 -0400, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > Sometimes this is what passes for "fun" around here :).
> > >
> > > -G.
>
> > I'd rather have that kind of fun than the paraconsistent
On 4/25/14 at 11:08am, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, x1122334455 wrote:
> > So you guys are going to try to confuse me?
>
> Not you in particular, but scams do tend to involve
> surprising/creative interpretations of the rules, which might or m
On 4/25/14 at 2:19pm, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote:
> > So you guys are going to try to confuse me? I have no
> > problem with this because I would probably do the same thing myself.
>
> I was trying to be clear! :) By the w
On 4/28/14 at 2:03am, omd wrote:
> I assign CFJ 3406 to LiberonScien:
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23/4/14, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> >
> >> Well, it looks like hazing isn't a crime anymore so... I CFJ on
> &
On 4/29/14 at 10:07pm, Fool wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 09:31 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>
>
> >
> > As for your earlier question about breaking the game -- if you figure
> > out a way to break the game, give it a try!
> >
> >
>
> I submit the following proposal,
> Title "On breaking
On 5/6/14 at 5:48pm, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 17:42 -0400, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> > I propose the following:
> >
> > --
> >
> > Proposal: Mandatory Identification
> >
> > Create a new Rule, titled "Mandatory
On 5/6/14 at 6:14pm, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> I withdraw the following proposal:
>
> --
>
> Proposal: Mandatory Identification
>
> Create a new Rule, titled "Mandatory Identification":
>
> When publishing a message to th
On 5/6/14 at 4:33pm, Sprocklem wrote:
> On 2014-05-06 14:21, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause Rule 2138 to amend itself by
> > replacing any instance of "Interstellar" in its text and title to
> > "Interoffice".
> >
> > -Henri
> I support.
>
> --
> Sprocklem
>
On 5/6/14 at 6:45pm, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Are people interested in doing another blitz nomic around the time of
> Agora's birthday?
>
> If so, does anyone have any ideas for how we would construct the
> initial ruleset? One thought I had would be to take the ruleset we had
> at the end of Ago
On 5/6/14 at 8:07pm, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:18 PM, omd wrote:
> > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
> > wrote:
> >> I object, for semi-obvious reasons.
> >
> > Me too, as my identity should be clear from the From line.
>
> I'm in favor, because I real
On 5/6/14 at 11:39pm, omd wrote:
> Did you know? One of the many Bitcoin escrow markets intended to take
> the place of the Silk Road is named Agora.
>
> After careful thought, I have concluded that there is a clear need to
> sell Agoran points on Agora.
>
I agree.
_
LiberonScien
On 5/8/14 at 12:38pm, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 23:38, "Aaron Goldfein" wrote:
> >
> > Are people interested in doing another blitz nomic around the time of
> > Agora's birthday?
> >
> > If so, does anyone have any ideas for how we would construct the
> > initial ruleset? One thought
On 5/9/14 at 3:12pm, omd wrote:
> Hi - you're late to judge CFJ 3406. Since you're new, here's a
> reminder in case you want to fix this. If not, I'll recuse you in a
> few days.
>
What is the case that I need to judge?
_
LiberonScien
On Wed, 23/4/14, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, it looks like hazing isn't a crime anymore so... I CFJ on
> >>> x1122334455, putting forth tradition as my main argument.
> >>
> >>> Also: Welcome! =D
> >>
> >> I CFJ on
On 6/6/14 at 2:06pm, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Can you hear me now?
>
>
I can read you.
_
LiberonScien
22 matches
Mail list logo
