Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Alexis Hunt
Oh, no, not at all. I just was at work and didn't have time to write a longer reply. I appreciate you nominating me, but I'm not able to take it on right now. Alexis On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:33 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay. Sorry if that came off mean, bu

Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
Okay. Sorry if that came off mean, but you are a bit... unpredictable. Did that just make it worse? (Sigh.) I'm not great at talking to people. -Aris On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 18:50 Aris Merchant gmail.com > > > wrote: > >> Thanks. Before e think

Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 18:50 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. Before e thinks of it emself, I'd like to politely request that > Alexis doesn't just come in and take this one. E's already Referee, and the > rest of us have to have some fun. I'd really like to have

Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
Thanks. Before e thinks of it emself, I'd like to politely request that Alexis doesn't just come in and take this one. E's already Referee, and the rest of us have to have some fun. I'd really like to have something to do. Besides, at this rate e may be speaker soon. -Aris On Thursday, October 13

Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 21:53:25 +0100 ais523 wrote: > Bear in mind that deputisation requires intent, unless the office is > empty or the action is more than fourteen days overdue. I'm aware, but as I've been a slacker for a whole month now, no announcement of intent is neccessary in this case. --

Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 22:48 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:57:41 -0700 > Aris Merchant wrote: > > > > > I looked at the responsibilities, and it doesn't look to bad. I'll > > take it in the short run and see how it works out. Do we need to have > > an election? > > > Thanks,

Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:57:41 -0700 Aris Merchant wrote: > I looked at the responsibilities, and it doesn't look to bad. I'll > take it in the short run and see how it works out. Do we need to have > an election? > Thanks, that's a relief! No, calling an election is not neccessary, we can use de

Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
I looked at the responsibilities, and it doesn't look to bad. I'll take it in the short run and see how it works out. Do we need to have an election? -Aris On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > I'll distribute the pending proposals tomorrow, but the Promotor office > is currentl

DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Luis Ressel
I'll distribute the pending proposals tomorrow, but the Promotor office is currently a bit of a burden for me. Is someone interested in taking it over (permanently or at least temporarily until November)? In related news, I'm not interested in judging CFJs until November. -- aranea