G. wrote:
I called the CFJ on June 24 and argued that summary judgement DIDN'T prevent
a payday:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-June/038657.html
but I don't see it listed in the next Gazette so maybe it was missed? (this
was also during the peak of
ATMunn's been sitting on it for a long time.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I called the CFJ on June 24 and argued that summary judgement DIDN'T
> prevent
> a payday:
>
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/
> agora-business/2018-June/038657.html
>
the result never got judged (poke ATMunn). but to me the result is clear:
the provision for making fines forgivable is _only_ contained within the
Cold Hand of Justice Rule.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I thought I remembered CFJing on this question in the last few
I called the CFJ on June 24 and argued that summary judgement DIDN'T prevent
a payday:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-June/038657.html
but I don't see it listed in the next Gazette so maybe it was missed? (this
was also during the peak of the
I thought I remembered CFJing on this question in the last few months, but
don't remember seeing the result (and couldn't find it in a quick Gazette
search). Anyone remember? Boy I really really really need to get the CFJ
database up-to-date again.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> I
I was sloppy with these, too. Summary Judgement fines are not
forgivable by definition. Therefore I am not eligible for a Ref salary
this month.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Rebecca wrote:
> There is one person recently late on reports (myself) and three people
> very late on CFJs. One of
It's fine, I just wanted to remind you of it for the future.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:32 AM Rebecca wrote:
>
> Oops. That's not a mandate and there's no retracting fines, but
> acknowledged, and I apologize. I thought it was only Christmas.
>
> There is a rule that says that fines are not
Oops. That's not a mandate and there's no retracting fines, but
acknowledged, and I apologize. I thought it was only Christmas.
There is a rule that says that fines are not effective if the
punishment imposed is manifestly inappropriate but that's only for the
value of the fine, so there's no
Please note Rule 1769 and the fact that it applies to all of these violations.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 4:09 AM Rebecca wrote:
>
> There is one person recently late on reports (myself) and three people
> very late on CFJs. One of them is Gaelan, a zombie, but the other two
> are PSS and ATMunn,
9 matches
Mail list logo
