FOR

Gaelan
> On May 16, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Aris Merchant 
> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the
> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote).
> 
> ID     Author(s)        AI   Title                 Pender     Pend fee (sh.)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7852*  nichdel,[1]      1.0  Granular Paydays (v3) nichdel    10
> 
> Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending.
> 
> [1] Aris, o, G.
> 
> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
> 
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7852
> Title: Granular Paydays (v3)
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: nichdel
> Co-author(s): Aris, o, G.
> 
> [v3: added the clarification of 'duty-fulfilling' reports]
> 
> [v2: Changed the switches to be natural, fixed not specifying what
> offices are paid, and deleted a typo that suggested the report was paid
> instead of the player.]
> 
> Flip the Payrate of every office to 2.
> 
> Amend 2484 (Payday) to read, in full:
> 
>      Payrate is a natural office switch, tracked by the ADoP, with a
>      default value of 2. Report Rate is a natural office switch,
>      tracked by the ADoP, with a default value of 2.
> 
> [Add in Report Rate, which can be adjusted by-office.]
> 
>      At the start of each month, if Agora's Balance is not 0 or less,
>      Agora SHALL pay each player 10 shinies.
> 
> [Nothing changed here.]
> 
>      Immediately afterward, for each duty-fulfilling report published
>      last month (in chronological order of publication), Agora SHALL
>      pay the publisher of the report the Report Rate for the office
>      the report is associated with unless paying would leave Agora's
>      balance at a negative value.
> 
> [Pay out for published reports before offices, in a way similar to how
> offices are paid. It's very important to note that, if Report Rates
> were not equal, it'd be possible to pay the 1st and 3rd reports but not
> the 2nd, if the 2nd would make Agora's balance negative but the 3rd
> would not.]
> 
>      Immediately afterward, for each office (first in ascending order
>      of Payrate, then in descending alphabetical order of office
>      name), Agora SHALL pay the holder of the office that office's
>      Payrate value unless paying would leave Agora's balance at a
>      negative value.
> 
> [This paragraph is rewritten to hopefully be more clear, but it is
> functionally the same except for changing '0 or less' to 'negative'.]
> 
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to