> > One thing your replacement text doesn't have is that the proposal CAN
> > apply the changes that it specifies. ("...CAN and does, as part of its
> > effect, ..."). Is that CAN important? Did P8354 somehow provide for
> > it elsewhere when it (I think) revised R106 to not include it?
>
> I
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:27 AM Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> > I have a new draft!
>
> Thanks for putting this together, Aris. A few comments and questions
> below.
Thank you for the feedback. I know it's a lot to dig through.
> > Amend Rule 1688, "Power", by, all as part of the
> I have a new draft!
Thanks for putting this together, Aris. A few comments and questions
below.
> Amend Rule 1688, "Power", by, all as part of the same amendment,
The numbers below aren't lined up:
> 1. Replacing:
> A statute is a document with positive Power.
>with:
>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:03 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> The time has come for us to undo Statutory Instrumentation and return
> to the noble design of the past. Comments are, as always, welcome,
> even if I can't promise I'll agree with them. :)
>
> -Aris
>
> ---
> Title:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:12 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/2021 12:02 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Apply S->I to Rule 1688, "Power".
> > Apply S->I to Rule 2438, "Ribbons".
>
> In the next draft, can you write out in full the changes to R1688?
On 1/27/2021 12:02 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Apply S->I to Rule 1688, "Power".
> Apply S->I to Rule 2438, "Ribbons".
In the next draft, can you write out in full the changes to R1688? I
think seeing all the substantive changes together will be important.
For example,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:21 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:14 AM Sarah Strange via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:58 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
>>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:14 AM Sarah Strange via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:58 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 28, 2021, at 12:55 AM, Gaelan Steele via
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:58 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 28, 2021, at 12:55 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 27, 2021, at 11:07 PM, Aris Merchant via
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 12:55 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jan 27, 2021, at 11:07 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Unless I’m missing something, this repeals the definition of instruments
>>> and adds a new one.
>>
>> That's
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 11:07 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>> Unless I’m missing something, this repeals the definition of instruments and
>> adds a new one.
>
> That's intentional, yes. Instruments would fill the hole that statutes do now.
Bah, I meant to say that it
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:27 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 27, 2021, at 12:02 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >
> > The time has come for us to undo Statutory Instrumentation and return
> > to the noble design of the past. Comments are, as
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 12:02 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> The time has come for us to undo Statutory Instrumentation and return
> to the noble design of the past. Comments are, as always, welcome,
> even if I can't promise I'll agree with them. :)
>
> -Aris
>
> ---
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
