Interesting, ok.
On 10/6/2018 3:51 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 15:31 -0400, ATMunn wrote:
Oh yeah, another question I had (not really related but kind of): Why
do some proposals have "A" or "B" after their number?
They don't. What's happened is that there's no longer a 1-to-1
On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 15:31 -0400, ATMunn wrote:
> Oh yeah, another question I had (not really related but kind of): Why
> do some proposals have "A" or "B" after their number?
They don't. What's happened is that there's no longer a 1-to-1
correspondence between Proposals and Agoran Decisions on
I have a bug report on that proposal which I'll try to write up later
today. It's a quick fix, but I'm very busy ATM.
-Arie
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018, 12:28 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> It failed (if it did) by being caught in scam crossfire - I'm going to put
> it
> back in the Razing of Land
Oh yeah, another question I had (not really related but kind of): Why do
some proposals have "A" or "B" after their number?
On 10/6/2018 3:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It failed (if it did) by being caught in scam crossfire - I'm going to put it
back in the Razing of Land proposal I plan to get
It failed (if it did) by being caught in scam crossfire - I'm going to put it
back in the Razing of Land proposal I plan to get pended this weekend
(with a conditional in case it didn't fail).
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> It might have passed. There are four votes that are contingent
It might have passed. There are four votes that are contingent on whether
it is possible to transfer coins to a contract, and those votes could push
the proposal over to passage. Won’t know until the relevant CFJs are
decided.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 3:10 PM ATMunn wrote:
> On 10/6/2018 2:30 PM,
On 10/6/2018 2:30 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
[snip] > Almost gone. There was a proposal to institute a point-based economy,
and it acquired a lot of support but people suddenly started to vote
AGAINST it in one huge movement.
That's a bummer, I looked at the proposal and it looked pretty neat.
Only if e is sold first and thus has a resale value less than 2.
As it is, you've forced em to take action, however minor, to
avoid that - not exactly welcoming :P
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> On the contrary, this can easily be reversed by ATMunn with no ill effects
> in
On the contrary, this can easily be reversed by ATMunn with no ill effects in
the interim period, and allows em to receive a Welcome Package again afterwards.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 6, 2018 6:36 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> On behalf of Gaelan, I act as
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> > -Am I a zombie?
>
> No, your master switch is even still yourself.
While you're not a zombie, I think someone recently announced an
intent to make you one, so you should post a quick hello there to
the public forum if you want to avoid zombiehood.
Welcome back.
On 10/6/2018 12:19 PM, ATMunn wrote:
Hi. Most of you probably remember that I used to play this game, and
then I kinda stopped playing this game. I think I want to play this game
again.
So, it would be nice if somebody could update me on the state of the
rules and the game. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
