> The newspaper just called me out for telling lots of old stories, but
It wasn't a criticism!
- Falsifian
PSS wrote:
On May 22, 2020, at 20:07, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
PSS wrote:
If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the
perpetrator, the Arbitor is the Judge. If the Arbitor is the
Investigator or the perpetrator, the Speaker is the
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 8:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 22, 2020, at 20:07, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >
> > PSS wrote:
> >
> >> If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the
> >> perpetrator, the Arbitor is the
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:24 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/2020 9:52 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > In retrospect those aren't the best examples, because we do use this pretty
> > frequently for scams and releveling economies (there's even such a provision
> >
> On May 22, 2020, at 20:07, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> PSS wrote:
>
>> If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the
>> perpetrator, the Arbitor is the Judge. If the Arbitor is the
>> Investigator or the perpetrator, the Speaker is
PSS wrote:
If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the
perpetrator, the Arbitor is the Judge. If the Arbitor is the
Investigator or the perpetrator, the Speaker is the Judge.
Okay, so Rule 2478 includes this:
The Referee is by default the
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:23 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/2020 8:59 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 5/21/20 6:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> For this
> >> decision, the vote collector
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 11:41:02 AM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/21/2020 9:32 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Sometimes I think it'd be interesting if we more often did gamestate
> > changing proposals with little to no rule changes in them. For instance
> > we
On 5/21/2020 9:32 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> Sometimes I think it'd be interesting if we more often did gamestate
> changing proposals with little to no rule changes in them. For instance
> we could do things like:
>
> "Destroy all coins in every players possession. For each player, e
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:33 AM nch via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 21, 2020 11:20:21 AM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Also realize, if you're going the Decision route, there's nothing
> > currently stopping punishment
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 11:20:21 AM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Also realize, if you're going the Decision route, there's nothing
> currently stopping punishment proposals, and even if this rule is
> implemented there's nothing stopping someone from changing the AI
> threshold
On 5/21/2020 8:59 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/21/20 6:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> For this
>> decision, the vote collector is the Judge, the options are GUILTY,
>> NOT GUILTY, REJECT, and PRESENT, and the
On 5/21/20 6:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> Title: High Crimes and Treason
> AI: 1.7
> Author: P.S.S.
> Coauthors: Aris, Jason
>
> Create a new rule, "High Crimes", with the following text:
>
> A high crime is any crime specified as being class
13 matches
Mail list logo
