Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic

[ATMunn]

Well, I think we'll just have it so that when the vote is resolved, the person 
who resolves it will repost the effects of the amendments (and possibly the new 
text of the contract)

On 11/27/2017 9:31 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:



On Nov 24, 2017, at 12:27 PM, ATMunn  wrote:

I vote YAY on both of these.


My understanding of the Notary rules is that I do not have to track instances 
of private assets, only the existence of whole classes of private assets. As 
such, I believe nobody actually records Amendment Proposals - but since I have 
to apply the bloody things, I’d appreciate if someone did, or if the 
participants in MiniNomic made some attempt to make changes to the contract 
easier to track.

For most contracts, this isn’t an issue, as changes are relatively sedate. For 
a Nomic-in-a-Nomic, the bookkeeping may be somewhat exceptional.

-o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic

[Owen Jacobson]

> On Nov 24, 2017, at 12:27 PM, ATMunn  wrote:
> 
> I vote YAY on both of these.

My understanding of the Notary rules is that I do not have to track instances 
of private assets, only the existence of whole classes of private assets. As 
such, I believe nobody actually records Amendment Proposals - but since I have 
to apply the bloody things, I’d appreciate if someone did, or if the 
participants in MiniNomic made some attempt to make changes to the contract 
easier to track.

For most contracts, this isn’t an issue, as changes are relatively sedate. For 
a Nomic-in-a-Nomic, the bookkeeping may be somewhat exceptional.

-o



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic

[Corona]

I create a new Amendment Proposal in the possesion of MN (This is how
I'll be referring to MiniNomic from now on, for convenience):

[If the following paragraph exists in MN's text, amend it by adding
"than" between "less" and "24".

A player CANNOT become a party to MiniNomic if e voluntarily ceased
to be a party less 24 hours ago.

Else, amend MN by adding the following paragraph to its text.

A player CANNOT become a party to MiniNomic if e voluntarily ceased
to be a party less than 24 hours ago.]

(The if-else statement is there so that it can succeed if, for some
reason, my earlier amendment failed)

I also vote YAY on the three Amendment Proposals in MN's possession
that were authored by me.

On 11/24/17, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
 wrote:
> There's a typo in the first.
> 
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>> On Nov 24, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Corona  wrote:
>>
>> I become party to MiniNomic.
>>
>> I create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's possession,
>> to preclude some possible future scams:
>>
>> [A player CANNOT become a party to MiniNomic if e voluntarily ceased
>> to be a party less 24 hours ago.]
>>
>> I also create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's
>> possession, to get a currency and win conditions (boring initially, as
>> in P. Suber's original Nomic ruleset):
>>
>> [Jade is a currency. MiniNomic is willing to receive Jade. At the
>> beginning of every Agoran week, every party to MiniNomic receives 100
>> Jade.
>>
>> MiniNomic Wins are a fixed currency.
>> When a player transfers 10 000 Jade to MiniNomic for the sole and
>> explicit purpose of obtaining a MiniNomic Win, one MiniNomic Win is
>> created in eir possession.]
>>
>> On 11/24/17, ATMunn  wrote:
>>> I cause the ACU to pay me 1 shiny by destroying 10 of my bills. I create
>>> the following contract, entitled "MiniNomic", paying 1 shiny to Agora to
>>> do so:
>>>
>>>
>>> ---IMMUTABLE SECTION
>>> Text in the section of this contract below the dividing line labeled
>>> "IMMUTABLE SECTION" is considered immutable. Text below the dividing
>>> line labeled "MUTABLE SECTION" is considered mutable.
>>>
>>> Any player CAN become a party (or cease to be a party) to this contract
>>> by announcement.
>>>
>>> Amendment Proposals are a type of fixed asset, which can only be owned
>>> by this contract. This contract is willing to receive Amendment
>>> Proposals.
>>>
>>> Any party to this contract CAN cause an Amendment Proposal to be created
>>> in this contract's possession, by announcement, specifying the amendment
>>> e wishes to make. This is known as Proposing an Amendment.
>>>
>>> Immutable text CANNOT be amended. Instead, in order for a block of
>>> immutable text to be amended, it must first be moved to the mutable
>>> section. This is known as transmutation. Transmutation can also consist
>>> of moving a block of mutable text to the immutable section.
>>>
>>> A valid amendment is transmutation of a block of immutable text to
>>> mutable text or vice versa, or deletion, changing, or adding of mutable
>>> text. An invalid amendment CANNOT be made.
>>>
>>> After a valid amendment is proposed, a voting period for that amendment
>>> begins. All parties to this contract (including the party who proposed
>>> the amendment) are considered Voters. Any Voter CAN cast a valid vote on
>>> an amendment by announcement. Valid votes are YAY and NAY. All Voters
>>> SHALL cast valid votes on amendments in a timely fashion after they are
>>> proposed.
>>>
>>> After 7 days have passed from the proposing of an amendment, no more
>>> votes can be cast, and any party CAN resolve the vote by announcement.
>>> When the vote is resolved for an Amendment Proposal, the Amendment
>>> Proposal is destroyed, and if more than half of the votes (rounded up)
>>> were YAY, then the Proposal passes and the amendment is made. Otherwise,
>>> the Proposal fails, and nothing happens.
>>> MUTABLE SECTION-
>>>
>
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

There's a typo in the first.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Nov 24, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Corona  wrote:
> 
> I become party to MiniNomic.
> 
> I create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's possession,
> to preclude some possible future scams:
> 
> [A player CANNOT become a party to MiniNomic if e voluntarily ceased
> to be a party less 24 hours ago.]
> 
> I also create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's
> possession, to get a currency and win conditions (boring initially, as
> in P. Suber's original Nomic ruleset):
> 
> [Jade is a currency. MiniNomic is willing to receive Jade. At the
> beginning of every Agoran week, every party to MiniNomic receives 100
> Jade.
> 
> MiniNomic Wins are a fixed currency.
> When a player transfers 10 000 Jade to MiniNomic for the sole and
> explicit purpose of obtaining a MiniNomic Win, one MiniNomic Win is
> created in eir possession.]
> 
> On 11/24/17, ATMunn  wrote:
>> I cause the ACU to pay me 1 shiny by destroying 10 of my bills. I create
>> the following contract, entitled "MiniNomic", paying 1 shiny to Agora to
>> do so:
>> 
>> 
>> ---IMMUTABLE SECTION
>> Text in the section of this contract below the dividing line labeled
>> "IMMUTABLE SECTION" is considered immutable. Text below the dividing
>> line labeled "MUTABLE SECTION" is considered mutable.
>> 
>> Any player CAN become a party (or cease to be a party) to this contract
>> by announcement.
>> 
>> Amendment Proposals are a type of fixed asset, which can only be owned
>> by this contract. This contract is willing to receive Amendment
>> Proposals.
>> 
>> Any party to this contract CAN cause an Amendment Proposal to be created
>> in this contract's possession, by announcement, specifying the amendment
>> e wishes to make. This is known as Proposing an Amendment.
>> 
>> Immutable text CANNOT be amended. Instead, in order for a block of
>> immutable text to be amended, it must first be moved to the mutable
>> section. This is known as transmutation. Transmutation can also consist
>> of moving a block of mutable text to the immutable section.
>> 
>> A valid amendment is transmutation of a block of immutable text to
>> mutable text or vice versa, or deletion, changing, or adding of mutable
>> text. An invalid amendment CANNOT be made.
>> 
>> After a valid amendment is proposed, a voting period for that amendment
>> begins. All parties to this contract (including the party who proposed
>> the amendment) are considered Voters. Any Voter CAN cast a valid vote on
>> an amendment by announcement. Valid votes are YAY and NAY. All Voters
>> SHALL cast valid votes on amendments in a timely fashion after they are
>> proposed.
>> 
>> After 7 days have passed from the proposing of an amendment, no more
>> votes can be cast, and any party CAN resolve the vote by announcement.
>> When the vote is resolved for an Amendment Proposal, the Amendment
>> Proposal is destroyed, and if more than half of the votes (rounded up)
>> were YAY, then the Proposal passes and the amendment is made. Otherwise,
>> the Proposal fails, and nothing happens.
>> MUTABLE SECTION-
>> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP