On 4/26/2020 8:26 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 22:30 -0400, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 16:55, ais523 wrote:
>>> Experience from BlogNomic is that many players apparently value
>>> causing a win to happen, even if it's some other player that
>>> actually gets the win
On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 22:30 -0400, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 16:55, ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > Experience from BlogNomic is that many players apparently value
> > causing a win to happen, even if it's some other
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 16:55, ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 14:53 -0600, Reuben Staley via agora-business
> wrote:
> > The following is a Notice of Honour:
> >
> > +1 PSS for reporting for Treasuror.
> > -1 twg for leaving without res
On 1/11/2020 8:08 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
Speaking of which, did the proposal that authorized D. Margaux's victory
actually do that? The rules at the moment don't seem to allow victory by
proposal, nor are victories self-ratifying any more.
FWIW we did ratify the Scroll a
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 21:30, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
> >> since they're pretty useless, that w
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 14:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
> >> since
On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
>> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
>> since they're pretty useless, that would be pointless. I perform the
>> following action 18 times: { If I have more than 1000
On behalf of tar I transfer 20 coins to R. Lee
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 2:24 PM James Cook wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 23:35, Rebecca wrote:
> > I also transfer tar's 20 coins to myself
>
> Does this work?
>
> R2466 requires that you "must, in the message in which the action is
> performed, un
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 20:48, Rance Bedwell wrote:
> If you want me to, I will attempt to withdraw the COE.
That might make things more interesting, since I don't see a way for
you to do it. I might still be able to deny it under Rule 2201; I'm
not sure. I don't think it's causing much harm.
I'm
On 3/5/2019 6:14 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I respond to the CoE by citing the CFJ.
(I swear I remember there being a proto floating around at some point to
change it so that just the existence of a relevant open CFJ would block
self-ratification
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I respond to the CoE by citing the CFJ.
(I swear I remember there being a proto floating around at some point to
change it so that just the existence of a relevant open CFJ would block
self-ratification, instead of having to go through this rigmaro
Oh don't worry about me, it's the only vaguely controversial thing that's
happened so far this week so it's pretty easy to keep track of in my head. If
it was actually too confusing I'd be docking karma from you myself. :P
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 9:06 PM
Seems like the solution here is to define (in a rule) “by announcement,
stating…” as requiring the “stating” bit to be part of the public message.
Gaelan
> On Mar 5, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> CFJ, barring twg: G. has earned 5 coins for the Herald's Report of
> 17-Feb-2019.
>
> On Mar 5, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Yes, I don't see how this is any different from "stating it to yourself".
> Your publication of the hash (if it even is a hash - I see no evidence that
> it's not just a random string of hexadecimal digits) didn't meaningfully
> com
I was starting to be concerned tbh lol.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:32 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 2/18/2019 12:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada
> dada
> > dada...
>
> (that dada thing was meant to be silly, not angry - i realized
Kinky.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:33 PM D. Margaux wrote:
> I point my toes at G. and cuddle beam for Faking.
>
> > On Feb 18, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >
> > maah uyntz asee as myself and sunt Dictatorship, also, the game is now
> > Ossified and nobody can perform any game actions,
On 2/18/2019 12:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada
dada...
(that dada thing was meant to be silly, not angry - i realized afterwards
that it sounded kinda shouty like what the dadaists did - sorry).
18 matches
Mail list logo
