Re: DIS: Re: BUS: testing collective punishment

2019-02-15 Thread Cuddle Beam
Are you arguing that "In order to appease this Rule, at least one player MUST perform The Ritual in every Agoran week." is just a prerequisite (like, "In order to get the cookies, you have to reach the shelf"?)? I understand it as that the method of appeasement is via performing the Ritual but that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: testing collective punishment

2019-02-15 Thread Kerim Aydin
The collective violation is by design. I thought about going further and using the passive voice ("The rules MUST be appeased weekly"). I don't want to use "each player MUST" - I want the implied violation to be firmly on all of us, not each of us separately. On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:08 AM D.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: testing collective punishment

2019-02-15 Thread Cuddle Beam
I personally think it would be more fun if it had to be removed by proposal lol. Or we give an award to whoever can remove it without a proposal and lift the curse off Agora. On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:07 PM D. Margaux wrote: > > > > On Feb 15, 2019, at 2:02 PM, James Cook wrote: > > > > Is it c

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: testing collective punishment

2019-02-15 Thread D. Margaux
> On Feb 15, 2019, at 2:02 PM, James Cook wrote: > > Is it clear that a player CAN appease the rule by performing The Ritual? I agree that this is ambiguous. Also, I think it was unclear who has the obligation to appease the Rule. Maybe it could say: Any player CAN perform The Ritu

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: testing collective punishment

2019-02-15 Thread James Cook
Is it clear that a player CAN appease the rule by performing The Ritual? On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 18:14, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > Lmao, I love it. It reminds me of “the button” of Lost. > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 16:46, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > I submit the following Proposal, The Ritual, AI