Re: DIS: report reward fixes
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 23:48, D. Margaux wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:39 PM omd wrote: > > Perhaps simplify to something like: > > > > * Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report for the first > > time in a given week or month (resp.): 5 coins. > > > > Though I suppose my wording is ambiguous as to whether you can claim > > the reward if a previous officeholder published the office's report in > > the same week/month. > > > To eliminate ambiguity, what about: > > Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report, provided that no such > report had been published previously in that week (if the reward is claimed > for a weekly report) or in that month (if the reward is claimed for a > monthly report). How about: Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report, provided that no such report had been published previously in that week or month, respectively. -- Walker
Re: DIS: report reward fixes
Good find! Yes, it is. That proposal would have accidentally required that the report only be counted if it fulfilled all of the weekly or monthly duties of an office; this phrasing avoids that problem. -Aris On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:51 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > Is this substantially different in any way from Proposal 8162 [0], which > failed by a large margin [1]? (Found it while I was looking through past > proposals, as one does). The circumstances probably are different now, > though. > > [0]: > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2019-February/012775.html > > [1]: > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2019-February/012795.html > > Jason Cobb > > On 6/14/19 6:48 PM, D. Margaux wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:39 PM omd wrote: > > > >> Perhaps simplify to something like: > >> > >>* Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report for the first > >> time in a given week or month (resp.): 5 coins. > >> > >> Though I suppose my wording is ambiguous as to whether you can claim > >> the reward if a previous officeholder published the office's report in > >> the same week/month. > > > > To eliminate ambiguity, what about: > > > > Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report, provided that no such > > report had been published previously in that week (if the reward is > claimed > > for a weekly report) or in that month (if the reward is claimed for a > > monthly report). >
Re: DIS: report reward fixes
Is this substantially different in any way from Proposal 8162 [0], which failed by a large margin [1]? (Found it while I was looking through past proposals, as one does). The circumstances probably are different now, though. [0]: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2019-February/012775.html [1]: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2019-February/012795.html Jason Cobb On 6/14/19 6:48 PM, D. Margaux wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:39 PM omd wrote: Perhaps simplify to something like: * Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report for the first time in a given week or month (resp.): 5 coins. Though I suppose my wording is ambiguous as to whether you can claim the reward if a previous officeholder published the office's report in the same week/month. To eliminate ambiguity, what about: Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report, provided that no such report had been published previously in that week (if the reward is claimed for a weekly report) or in that month (if the reward is claimed for a monthly report).
Re: DIS: report reward fixes
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:42 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > Amend Rule 2496 (Rewards) by replacing: > Publishing a duty-fulfilling report: > with: > Publishing a duty-fulfilling official report: So this would now read * Publishing a duty-fulfilling official report: 5 coins. For each office, this reward can only be claimed for the first weekly report published in a week and the first monthly report published in a month. Seems a little redundant, since "duty-fulfilling" overlaps with the second sentence. Perhaps simplify to something like: * Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report for the first time in a given week or month (resp.): 5 coins. Though I suppose my wording is ambiguous as to whether you can claim the reward if a previous officeholder published the office's report in the same week/month.
