The _coin balances_ have self-ratified. Historical transactions themselves generally don't.
-twg ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > Support. Has the transfer itself self-ratified? > > On 1/29/2019 10:02 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > I support > > -twg > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:00 PM, D. Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > > > I intend to enter this into moot with 3 support. > > > I don’t think it’s clear from the “IRRELEVANT” decision whether quang’ing > > > actually works or not. And people still are quang’ing quite often, so it > > > would probably be useful to get clarity on the question of whether that > > > actually is effective. > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > > > > From: "D. Margaux" dmargaux...@gmail.com > > > > Date: January 23, 2019 at 4:26:32 PM EST > > > > To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org > > > > Subject: Re: DIS: Re: Fwd: Re: BUS: Weekly maintenance > > > > I support > > > > > > > > > On Jan 23, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@uw.edu wrote: > > > > > TTTTPF > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > > > Subject: DIS: Re: Fwd: Re: BUS: Weekly maintenance > > > > > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:24:40 -0800 > > > > > From: Kerim Aydin ke...@uw.edu > > > > > Reply-To: Agora Nomic discussions (DF) agora-discussion@agoranomic.org > > > > > To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org > > > > > I intend to file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3692 w/2 Support. It is > > > > > certainly relevant whether or not twg earned 5 coins. It may be > > > > > trivially > > > > > true and therefore not relevant to the future interpretation of > > > > > "quang" > > > > > (because twg cited the meaning directly in the message), but the > > > > > success of > > > > > the transfer itself is not IRRELEVANT. > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/19/2019 10:26 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: > > > > > > JUDGEMENT OF CFJ 3692 > > > > > > This case concerns a message sent by twg on the eighth of January. > > > > > > In this message, twg defined two definitions to the word "quang" as > > > > > > an unofficial term undefined by the rules. While it is true that > > > > > > shorthand is tolerated in Agora and is somewhat of an integral part > > > > > > of our culture, what with constantly using "TTttPF" to correct our > > > > > > mistakes, it is also true that such terminology only gains its > > > > > > meaning from the acceptance of the Agoran community at large and > > > > > > not from the rules themselves. Because of this, I judge this case > > > > > > IRRELEVANT. > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: BUS: Weekly maintenance > > > > > > Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:39:37 -0500 > > > > > > From: ATMunn iamingodsa...@gmail.com > > > > > > Reply-To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org > > > > > > To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org > > > > > > because why not, I CFJ on the following: > > > > > > In the message quoted below, twg successfully earned 5 coins for > > > > > > publishing the Treasuror's most recent report. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/8/2019 11:38 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > > > > > Defining some shorthand: > > > > > > > To "quang" an office is to earn 5 coins for publishing that > > > > > > > office's most recent report. > > > > > > > To "quang" a player is to act on the player's behalf to transfer > > > > > > > all eir liquid assets to oneself. > > > > > > > I quang Treasuror. I quang Referee. I quang Tailor. I quang > > > > > > > Tenhigitsune. > > > > > > > -twg
