[ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks

2004-07-19 Thread Isobel Clark
Jul The warning about kriging small blocks is about small relative to the sampling density. For example, less than about one-third of the grid spacing. The warning is the same as the one about 'point' kriging (mapping) The map is too smooth - or, at least, a lot smoother than the real surface

[ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks

2004-07-19 Thread Isobel Clark
: segunda-feira, 19 de julho de 2004 05:23 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: [ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks Jul The warning about kriging small blocks is about small relative to the sampling density. For example, less than about one-third of the grid spacing

RE: [ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks

2004-07-19 Thread Edward Isaaks
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks Nicolau I was talking about kriging before cutoff is applied. If the cutoff is applied to the block estimates my comments stand. If you aply the cutoff to your data

[ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks

2004-07-19 Thread Isobel Clark
Ed I would differ from your explanation on one point. If you are merely declaring a mineral resource, i.e. mineral in the ground, then the conditional bias may not be relevant at the pre feasibility stage. However, as soon as you introduce any economic or technical parameters which entail

RE: [ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks

2004-07-19 Thread Edward Isaaks
: Isobel Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:47 AM To: Edward Isaaks Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ai-geostats] Re: Kriging Small Blocks Ed I would differ from your explanation on one point. If you are merely declaring a mineral resource, i.e. mineral in the ground