RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-05 Thread Gregoire Dubois
Title: Message Ciao Sebastiano, I realized nobody replied to your question (sorry for have added confusion here). I don't see any objection in applying any interpolator to probability values. However, you should better use exact interpolators to avoid getting probabilities of

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-05 Thread Pierre Goovaerts
- From: Gregoire Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 9/5/2005 7:00 AM To: 'seba'; ai-geostats@unil.ch Cc: Subject: RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms Ciao Sebastiano, I realized

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-05 Thread seba
will be one). Pierre -Original Message- From: Gregoire Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 9/5/2005 7:00 AM To: 'seba'; ai-geostats@unil.ch Cc: Subject: RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms Ciao

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-02 Thread seba
I try to reformulate my question. When performing direct (i.e. without crossvariogram) indicator kriging, practically we interpolate probability values by means of ordinary kriging. These probability values could represent the probability of occurrence of some category or the probability to

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-08-31 Thread Gregoire Dubois
ssed below. Best regards, Gregoire -Original Message-From: seba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 August 2005 18:17To: ai-geostats@unil.chSubject: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms Dear list membersI would like to have some comments, s

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-08-31 Thread seba
] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms Dear list members I would like to have some comments, suggestions or critics about the following topic: building a (preliminary) local uncertainty model of the spatial distribution of discrete (categorical) variables by means of natural neighbor

Re: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-08-31 Thread Nicolas Gilardi
To answer to Gregoire's question, for some comparisons between SVM and Indicator Kriging, here is a very basic paper (from 1999): http://baikal-bangkok.org/~nicolas/publi/acai99-svm.pdf and a thesis chapter (chapter 6), perhaps more interesting (from 2002):

[Fwd: Re: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms]

2005-08-31 Thread Nicolas Gilardi
@unil.ch Subject: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms Dear list members I would like to have some comments, suggestions or critics about the following topic: building a (preliminary) local uncertainty model of the spatial distribution of discrete (categorical) variables

[ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-08-30 Thread seba
Dear list members I would like to have some comments, suggestions or critics about the following topic: building a (preliminary) local uncertainty model of the spatial distribution of discrete (categorical) variables by means of natural neighbor interpolation method applied to indicator