RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-05 Thread Gregoire Dubois
Title: Message Ciao Sebastiano, I realized nobody replied to your question (sorry for have added confusion here). I don't see any objection in applying any interpolator to probability values. However, you should better use exact interpolators to avoid getting probabilities of

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-05 Thread Pierre Goovaerts
- From: Gregoire Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 9/5/2005 7:00 AM To: 'seba'; ai-geostats@unil.ch Cc: Subject: RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms Ciao Sebastiano, I realized

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-05 Thread seba
will be one). Pierre -Original Message- From: Gregoire Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 9/5/2005 7:00 AM To: 'seba'; ai-geostats@unil.ch Cc: Subject: RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms Ciao

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-09-02 Thread seba
I try to reformulate my question. When performing direct (i.e. without crossvariogram) indicator kriging, practically we interpolate probability values by means of ordinary kriging. These probability values could represent the probability of occurrence of some category or the probability to

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-08-31 Thread Gregoire Dubois
Title: Message I recently attended a presentation about the mapping of soil properties. Kriging was applied and I was wondering why a regression technique was used instead of a classification algorithm. Delineating soil properties seemed to be, at first sight, a classification problem than

RE: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-08-31 Thread seba
Hi Gregorie Well, I think that classification could be viewed as a way of coding of information in sampled areas. In particular for soil properties continuos or fuzzy classification seems to work properly. Then, avoiding to talk about the non-convexity of kriging, we can interpolate before or

Re: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms

2005-08-31 Thread Nicolas Gilardi
To answer to Gregoire's question, for some comparisons between SVM and Indicator Kriging, here is a very basic paper (from 1999): http://baikal-bangkok.org/~nicolas/publi/acai99-svm.pdf and a thesis chapter (chapter 6), perhaps more interesting (from 2002):

[Fwd: Re: [ai-geostats] natural neighbor applied to indicator transforms]

2005-08-31 Thread Nicolas Gilardi
I'm also forwarding this answer from Dr Samy Bengio who hasn't subscribed to ai-geostats. His e-mail address is available at the end of his e-mail. Best regards -- Nicolas Gilardi Particle Physics Experiment group University of Edinburgh, JCMB Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, United Kingdoms tel: +44