"Nicolas M. Thiery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maybe I didn't express it very clearly: there was *no* interest *at
> > all* in the current version of the species program.
>
> Which really does not come as a surprise to me: only a few persons at SLC are
> really doing computations. For the ra
Oh, Nicolas, thank you very much for your comment.
I believe there is currently a big problem. Apart from some people who
don't want to use computers for experiments, there are also those who
want to use them but do not appreciate that it is not the most trivial
task in the world to translate a
> Maybe I didn't express it very clearly: there was *no* interest *at
> all* in the current version of the species program.
Which really does not come as a surprise to me: only a few persons at
SLC are really doing computations. For the rare ones who do, species
are just one tool among many others
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was not entirely doing nothing during your stay in Lyon. I think by now I
> understand how to correctly generate isomorphism types for the composition of
> species. However, different from your approach, I will keep the labels and
> thus
> produces re
Hi Martin
On 03/22/2007 06:52 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Dear Ralf,
>
> I just committed some more doc for composition (that's the stuff I wrote
> during
> the flight to Lyon)
>
> It's still not complete, but meanwhile it should be possible to understand why
> one has to extend to multisort cont
