ps3_gelic_wireless.c: also remove a stray p after a newline.
Signed-off-by: Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
---
drivers/net/ps3_gelic_net.c |4 ++--
drivers/net/ps3_gelic_wireless.c | 34
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, David Miller wrote:
All applied, but I have to make some fixups.
For example, GIT warns about trailing whitespace on any lines that you
touched so I had to fix those up before putting them into the tree.
I did wonder about fixing that or not. But as the surrounding
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Benjamin Cama wrote:
I don't know the exact cause of this bug, but there is not enough
informations (for me) to try to understand this bug. Could you give at
least a dmesg result when in the installer ? And what exact message does
it outputs when looking for the
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Robert Lemmen wrote:
unless you object soon, i will suggest the removal of these packages
from testing. the rationale is (a mixture of these will apply to the
package in question)
This package should not be removed. The bug is partly theoretical and only
affects a
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
-AC_CHECK_LIB(newt, newtInit, FRONTENDS=$FRONTENDS newt, echo
- *** Cannot build Newt plugin ***)
+AC_CHECK_LIB(newt, newtInit, FRONTENDS=$FRONTENDS newt, echo ***
Cannot build Newt plugin ***)
Fixed. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Robert Lemmen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
This package should not be removed. The bug is partly theoretical and
only affects a minority of use cases.
ok, so you think it should be squeeze-ignore? do you think it should
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Benjamin Cama wrote:
OK. So, if it has not already been told (I didn't see much details about
that in this BR) what steps should be taken for powerpc volunteers ?
If you are not a Debian Developer I'm afraid you cannot help with this
issue.
However, there is plenty
tags 373253 wontfix
thanks
Because of the switch from DirectFB to X.Org as backend for the graphical
installer I don't think this issue is relevant anymore.
But I'm keeping the BR open for now for reference.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Rick Thomas wrote:
So how do we get this fixed? If it really is a problem on the buildd,
who *can* fix it? Is there a list somewhere of who is responsible for
which buildd?
I've already provided that info a few times. For the centralized D-I
buildds (which
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The code in user-setup-apply to add the first user to all the groups
in passwd/user-default-groups should no longer be needed. I believe
it should be dropped for Squeeze, or at least the default groups used
should be trimmed down to
(Dropping some CCs.)
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Norberto Feliberty wrote:
However maybe that has changed and will test a sid build and see if
it can find the network drivers to install.
That will only work if you build your own images. If you can do that,
great!
The fact that the official
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
What about (server) systems that don't have consolekit installed?
Yes, what about them?
On such systems the first user would be left without expected default
access to devices.
If the local user to have special privileges, one should
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Proposed plan:
==
(1)
In order to get everyone ready, I'd suggest (kindly) asking pkg-gnome
folks to upload their 2.28 packages to unstable; [...]
(2)
Once that done, I'll rebuild the following d-i packages against them:
[...]
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Robert Lemmen wrote:
unless you object soon, i will suggest the removal of these packages
from testing. the rationale is (a mixture of these will apply to the
package in question)
This package should not be removed. The bug is partly theoretical and only
affects a
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Robert Lemmen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
This package should not be removed. The bug is partly theoretical and
only affects a minority of use cases.
ok, so you think it should be squeeze-ignore? do you think it should
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Martin Krause wrote:
CC drivers/spi/spi.o
CC drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.o
drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c:31:30: error: plat/s3c64xx-spi.h: No such file
or directory
The file 's3c64xx-spi.h' seems not to exist in my repo. What am I
doing wrong?
I have it:
(Setting Reply-to to the debian-boot list which is more appropriate.)
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, dimas wrote:
earlier i've installed Debian testing several times from bussinesscard
images (28M) and all was fine. but now i was really surprised when i
tried to do this and haven't found Reiserfs
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
* Even if an e500 port does not go upstream, would it be possible to get
the appropriate entries added to the upstream dpkg cpu and triplet
tables? We're using a simple 10-line patch to dpkg locally, hopefully
that would be acceptable?
That has been done in the
reassign 549681 base-installer
severity 549681 normal
tag 549681 help
user debian-b...@lists.debian.org
usertag 549681 powerpc
thanks
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
some OpenFirmware implementations, such as the one in the PegasosII,
have a 12 MB size limit on kernel
Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
main-menu - Debian installer main menu (udeb)
Changes:
main-menu (1.31) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Colin Watson ]
* Upgrade to debhelper v7.
.
[ Frans Pop ]
* Remove check for menu item 99900; no packages use it anymore.
* Remove no longer needed
cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.149
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
cdebconf - Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation
System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
cdebconf-gtk-entropy - cdebconf gtk plugin for reading from /dev/random (udeb)
cdebconf-newt-entropy - cdebconf newt plugin for reading from /dev/random
(udeb)
cdebconf-text-entropy - cdebconf text
-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
cdebconf-gtk-terminal - cdebconf gtk plugin displaying a terminal (udeb)
cdebconf-newt-terminal - cdebconf newt plugin to provide a clean terminal
(udeb)
Closes: 574287
Changes:
cdebconf-terminal (0.7) unstable; urgency
-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
rootskel-gtk - Additions for graphical installs to skeleton root filesystem
(deb (udeb)
Closes: 574288
Changes:
rootskel-gtk (1.18) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Julien Cristau / Frans Pop ]
* Switch to X.Org instead of DirectFB as backend (closes
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I'm a bit annoyed with lintian officializing usage of the non-official
field name.
It's counterproductive IMO. The issue should be resolved at the dpkg
level. Unfortunately the underlying issue has never been resolved
between Guillem and the
reassign 549681 base-installer
severity 549681 normal
tag 549681 help
user debian-b...@lists.debian.org
usertag 549681 powerpc
thanks
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
some OpenFirmware implementations, such as the one in the PegasosII,
have a 12 MB size limit on kernel
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I'm a bit annoyed with lintian officializing usage of the non-official
field name.
It's counterproductive IMO. The issue should be resolved at the dpkg
level. Unfortunately the underlying issue has never been resolved
between Guillem and the
(Setting Reply-to to the debian-boot list which is more appropriate.)
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, dimas wrote:
earlier i've installed Debian testing several times from bussinesscard
images (28M) and all was fine. but now i was really surprised when i
tried to do this and haven't found Reiserfs
On Friday 19 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
How about merging the cdebconf{,-entropy,-terminal} and rootskel-gtk
patches, uploading those packages, while I'm uploading a new revision
of xorg-server disabling the udeb for sparc?
I'll take
On Tuesday 23 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Or rather, let's integrate the functionality in the preseed udeb but at
the same time remove the need for all separate auto-install udebs.
Phil and I discussed the changes on IRC yesterday. Based on that I've
committed them (after one fix) and have
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl (17/03/2010):
I've no idea if/how this is possible, but it would be great if you
could look into it.
Being a standard human being with 24 hours per day, I'm going to say
‘no’ this time, sorry.
Fair enough
On Friday 26 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Keeping the white as option could be useful for e.g. the dark
theme, but that means we'd need a way to change the cursor.
At (d-i, not udeb-providing-source-package) build time, I assume? In
both cases, it's just about a link to create
reassign 549681 base-installer
severity 549681 normal
tag 549681 help
user debian-b...@lists.debian.org
usertag 549681 powerpc
thanks
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
some OpenFirmware implementations, such as the one in the PegasosII,
have a 12 MB size limit on kernel
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I'm a bit annoyed with lintian officializing usage of the non-official
field name.
It's counterproductive IMO. The issue should be resolved at the dpkg
level. Unfortunately the underlying issue has never been resolved
between Guillem and the
Geert Lorang wrote:
The thing I find a bit strange is why I always get the message turn off
boot console ttyB0?
Shouldn't the message be something like console handover: boot [ttyB0]
- real [ttyS0] ? Now it looks like it disables the boot console but
won't enable another console.
But it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:34:41 +0100
Source: pkgsel
Binary: pkgsel
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f
On Monday 22 March 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
If I dont configure a mirror for the regular system, I will mostly
likely edit the sources.list myself anyway. And then I could also enable
commented out entries for volatile and security...
It could also be you're installing from DVD and not
tags 575012 wontfix
severity 575012 wishlist
thanks
On Monday 22 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The current installation and download links referring to 'AMD64'
sometimes confuse users with Intel x86-64 chips, who instead select
'IA64'. This is a waste of time and bandwidth for all
On Monday 22 March 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
If I dont configure a mirror for the regular system, I will mostly
likely edit the sources.list myself anyway. And then I could also enable
commented out entries for volatile and security...
It could also be you're installing from DVD and not
tags 575012 wontfix
severity 575012 wishlist
thanks
On Monday 22 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The current installation and download links referring to 'AMD64'
sometimes confuse users with Intel x86-64 chips, who instead select
'IA64'. This is a waste of time and bandwidth for all
Geert Lorang wrote:
I tried Debian stable (2.6.26-2-parisc64), unstable (2.6.30-2-parisc64),
(and gentoo 2.6.24-gentoo-r3-livecd64) but all got the same issue, while
the kernel boots up I got the message turn off boot console ttyB0 and
here it just waits forever.
Although I do hear that my
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
rootskel - Skeleton root filesystem used by debian-installer (udeb)
rootskel-bootfloppy - Skeleton root filesystem used by debian-installer boot
floppy (udeb)
Changes:
rootskel (1.84) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Samuel Thibault ]
* hurd
Package: libklibc-dev
Version: 1.5.16-1
Severity: serious
The D-I package rootskel failed to build with this version and also after
upgrading to 1.5.17-2 because header files could not be found.
The cause was traced to the fact that instead of symlinks there are empty
directories:
$ ls -dl
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I and Luca Capello (gismo) worked on d-i for the freerunner at Debconf
9. We decided back then that whatever method we choose it should be
supported by the factory default settings of the u-boot on the
freerunner.
I'm currently working on
On Monday 22 March 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Frans opinion seems to be that it's possible to commit changes to d-i
even if we use an external kernel. At Debconf9 I got the impression that
this is not what the d-i team wants.
But I've also said that it depends on the changes.
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
$ dpkg -l linux-libc-dev | grep ^ii
ii linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-10
ok I have similar, the 2.6.32-9 verison on amd64,
so should work fine.
Still get the same errors with
ii libklibc 1.5.17-2 minimal libc subset for
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
$ dpkg -l linux-libc-dev | grep ^ii
ii linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-10
ok I have similar, the 2.6.32-9 verison on amd64,
so should work fine.
Still get the same errors with
ii
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
ok would need info on the missing symlinks:
ls -l /usr/lib/klibc/include/linux
and
ls -l /usr/lib/klibc/include/asm*
I think that's the problem. They're not symlinks, but empty directories.
Looks like a bug in the upgrade?
$ ls -dl
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
I think that's the problem. They're not symlinks, but empty directories.
A purge and re-install gets me symlinks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
please reportbug
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003211850.24933.elen...@planet.nl
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I and Luca Capello (gismo) worked on d-i for the freerunner at Debconf
9. We decided back then that whatever method we choose it should be
supported by the factory default settings of the u-boot on the
freerunner.
I'm currently working on
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
fixed in 1.5.17-4, will ask to unblock this one for testing migration
soon. any current constraints concerning that timeline from d-i?
Nope. We currently don't have any boot floppies, so rootskel-bootfloppy
isn't really used.
But we should
On Monday 22 March 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Frans opinion seems to be that it's possible to commit changes to d-i
even if we use an external kernel. At Debconf9 I got the impression that
this is not what the d-i team wants.
But I've also said that it depends on the changes.
--
To
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 03:29 +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
elen...@planet.nl wrote:
I don't think the first would be a very good idea as it means that
we'll still not be rid of the IDE drivers. It seems better to
concentrate the
Indeed.
Package: libklibc-dev
Version: 1.5.16-1
Severity: serious
The D-I package rootskel failed to build with this version and also after
upgrading to 1.5.17-2 because header files could not be found.
The cause was traced to the fact that instead of symlinks there are empty
directories:
$ ls -dl
On Saturday 20 March 2010, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
It is of course reasonable to require that people familiarize themselves
with how things are set up before being given access. But beyond that,
if they are Debian Developers, getting access to the webwml repository
is a no-brainer, AIUI.
If
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Disclaimer: I don't know the technical setup of www.d.o, so I don't
know if there is a different between commit time and publish time.
Until I fix this ignorance of mine, that would surely block me from
committing, for instance :-) ]
No, there is not. The website
Could someone please take a look at this? Not sure if it's a klibc
regression or that it's just something that requires fixing on
our side.
CCing maks in case he has any ideas.
Cheers,
FJP
$ dpkg -l libklibc-dev | grep ^ii
ii libklibc-dev 1.5.16-1
make[2]: Entering directory
Thanks for the quick reply maks!
On Saturday 20 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
$ dpkg -l libklibc-dev | grep ^ii
ii libklibc-dev 1.5.16-1
dpkg -l libklibc-dev |grep ^ii
ii libklibc-dev1.5.17-1
Yes, saw your blog post. Will try with
Package: debtree
Version: 1.0.5
If a package name contains regexp characters, mainly +, the following can
occur:
Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by -- HERE in m/(^|,)g++ -- HERE (,|
$)/ at /usr/local/bin/debtree line 377.
sub first_set_with_package {
my ($package, $set) = @_;
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
1) 114 people have commit access to webwml. Given that version
control makes it easy to undo changes, minimizing risk and
impact, are there any legitimate reasons why this repository
should be restricted to a group any smaller than the whole of
gid 800?
No; and in
On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
How about merging the cdebconf{,-entropy,-terminal} and rootskel-gtk
patches, uploading those packages, while I'm uploading a new revision
of xorg-server disabling the udeb for sparc?
I'll take a look at that within the next couple of days. Don't
On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'm not sure whether it's feasible to push everything up to the
“libvte9-udeb, libgtk2.0-0-udeb, libpango1.0-udeb, gtk2-engines-udeb”
layer, that would break cdebconf-gtk-{entropy,terminal,udeb}?
That's not a problem as those udebs are currently
On Friday 19 March 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I must be missing something but all affected modules look as safe to
move to testing since they're in initrd. Am I wrong?
Yes.
* cdebconf-entropy
* cdebconf-terminal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Friday 19 March 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hey but we don't have g-i now so it won't be buildable but current
images are going to keep working. So no problem in moving them. Right?
Can you be 100% sure with these changes that the newt versions are not
going to break? I guess they
On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
The following packages should be the ones broken by this push:
,---[ Packages in sid still depending on *directfb* udebs ]---
| cdebconf-gtk-entropy
| cdebconf-gtk-terminal
| cdebconf-gtk-udeb
These will be broken, as expected.
|
On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Would it seem acceptable to force the current package as is, and then fix
this right afterward?
[...]
Since I really would like to get stuff migrated ASAP (I would hate
blocking anyone), I think we should go for either breaking or dropping
it
On Friday 19 March 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
Looks like none of the Xlib locale data is used by gtk apps, so I got a
libx11-6-udeb from the current
Installed-Size: 3700
to
Installed-Size: 1344
by removing that. Should help with the image size, I hope (although
this is mostly text, so
Clytie Siddall wrote:
random-bits.po has a list of XML entities:
#. Tag: entry
#: random-bits.xml:293
#, no-c-format
msgid task-laptop-inst;
msgstr task-laptop-inst;
[...]
which I'm assuming we shouldn't translate.
Correct.
If that's the case, should these strings be in the PO file
-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
kbd-chooser - Detect a keyboard and select layout (udeb)
Changes:
kbd-chooser (1.54) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Ensure that kbd gets installed together with console-setup. Currently it
is only recommended.
* Install keyboard-configuration instead
On Thursday 18 March 2010, Olivier Vitrat wrote:
Are you able to reproduce it with a recent version of the package ?
If yes, which version ?
It can still be reproduced with the Lenny version of kmail. No idea about
Squeeze. If you want to know that, you'll have to try it yourself.
If not,
On Thursday 18 March 2010, Olivier Vitrat wrote:
Are you able to reproduce it with a recent version of the package ?
If yes, which version ?
It can still be reproduced with the Lenny version of kmail. No idea about
Squeeze. If you want to know that, you'll have to try it yourself.
If not,
On Thursday 18 March 2010, kin boster wrote:
what (.deb) packages need for installer except .udeb packages ?
You seem to be misunderstanding some things fundamentally here.
.udebs and .debs are *completely* separate and saying that D-I needs both
makes absolutely no sense at all.
.udebs
On Monday 15 March 2010, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
-apt-install console-setup || true
+apt-install --with-recommends console-setup || true
Yes, trivial, but somehow I don't like this. I don't see why c-s has to
be the package that ensures that kbd is installed. What if for some
reason some
(Replying to the list only; please CC me on replies as I'm not subscribed)
On Thursday 18 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
PATA drivers of either flavour are mostly selected on a per-architecture
basis, and no change has been made to non-x86. If people are willing to
test on the non-x86
(Please CC on replies.)
On Thursday 18 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:05:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
PATA drivers of either flavour are mostly selected on a
per-architecture basis, and no change has been made
István Németh wrote:
How can I setup a buildd environment to join the autobuilder network? I
didn't find any working documentation.
I don't think this is the correct list for that question. I suggest you try
debian-wb-t...@l.d.o (although I'm not 100% that is the correct list
either, but they
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
please find attached the patch to switch from DirectFB to X11. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00313.html for the
details.
--- src/lib/debian-installer.d/Makefile (révision 62665)
+++ src/lib/debian-installer.d/Makefile
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
This seem like a good optimization for the installation time to bring
over to Debian, making sure update-initramfs is only executed twice
during the installation instead of several times more
In exactly which scenario would it be executed
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
It is possible some of these are from setting up the LTSP chroot
environment.
Something looks very broken in this example.
Why is initramfs-tools getting set up twice for the same version?
Why is dmsetup getting installed if it is not
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
No idea. This what made me suspect the cause might be the LTSP
chroot.
Ah. I failed to really comprehend that earlier.
Yes, I guess that could be and that would of course make it separate from
base system installation
Why is dmsetup
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:50:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/debian-installer.d/S62Xorg
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Xorg -retro -noreset -nolisten tcp
+export DISPLAY=:0
This is racy, we probably should do something
tag 574407 pending
thanks
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, max wrote:
os-prober does not detect 64bit systems like Fedora 64.
The /usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/90linux-distro script only checks
$dir/lib/ld*.so* but to detect Fedora 64 correctly it must check
$dir/lib64/ld*.so* too.
I've simplified
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Once that done, I'll rebuild the following d-i packages against them:
* cdebconf
* cdebconf-entropy
* cdebconf-terminal
* rootskel-gtk
I've just had a look at how the help dialogs look now, and they are much
better. But they are now on
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Hugo Alberto Perlin wrote:
The first part I mean the part before select what kind of installation,
like Desktop, Data Base Server, Web Server... The second part is after
that.
That is still not 100% clear. Are both parts you mean *after* apt-setup, or
is the first
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, kin boster wrote:
When I configure debian-installer/my_test-udeb/title in templates.
the warning of syslog is disappear, but the titile line also display
two exclamation mark( ! ) and lead to another problem: in the main-menu,
the menu-item of my_test display blank
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
please find attached the patch to switch from DirectFB to X11. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00313.html for the
details.
--- src/lib/debian-installer.d/Makefile (révision 62665)
+++ src/lib/debian-installer.d/Makefile
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
This seem like a good optimization for the installation time to bring
over to Debian, making sure update-initramfs is only executed twice
during the installation instead of several times more
In exactly which scenario would it be executed
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
It is possible some of these are from setting up the LTSP chroot
environment.
Something looks very broken in this example.
Why is initramfs-tools getting set up twice for the same version?
Why is dmsetup getting installed if it is not
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
No idea. This what made me suspect the cause might be the LTSP
chroot.
Ah. I failed to really comprehend that earlier.
Yes, I guess that could be and that would of course make it separate from
base system installation
Why is dmsetup
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:50:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/debian-installer.d/S62Xorg
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Xorg -retro -noreset -nolisten tcp
+export DISPLAY=:0
This is racy, we probably should do something
tag 574407 pending
thanks
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, max wrote:
os-prober does not detect 64bit systems like Fedora 64.
The /usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/90linux-distro script only checks
$dir/lib/ld*.so* but to detect Fedora 64 correctly it must check
$dir/lib64/ld*.so* too.
I've simplified
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 16. März 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
An additional issue with non-free firmware is that including it in the
way you propose would (I think) mean it will get loaded without any
prompting of the user, which may in some cases violate
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Actually, something causes main-menu to crash if I adjust mountmedia
to return CD devices too, so I suspect it is better to adjust
check-missing-firmware to also look in /cdrom/firmware/ for debs.
Probably because the CD is already mounted
reassign 573791 installation-reports
tag 573791 unreproducible needinfo
thanks
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, steve clark wrote:
I sent a report to the debian bug reporting system (bug number 573791)
but it seems to not have been taken serious, being shuffled between
responsible owners.
I see it
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Paul Jurczak wrote:
Comments/Problems:
I'm experimenting with various distributions and I successfully
installed Ubuntu, Puppy, Fedora from USB Flash to USB Flash. Debian is
the first distro, where I had to go USB CD to USB Flash route.
Debian supports all kinds of
Please always reply to the BTS, not to the person responding.
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, you wrote:
Thank you for quick response. Do you mean that copying
hd-media/boot.img.gz and .iso image to USB Flash will result in
different installation behavior than preparing USB Flash with LiveUSB
reassign 573791 installation-reports
tag 573791 unreproducible needinfo
thanks
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, steve clark wrote:
I sent a report to the debian bug reporting system (bug number 573791)
but it seems to not have been taken serious, being shuffled between
responsible owners.
I see it
Please note this log is taken just now using:
debian 5.04 netinst business card image
I have just tried with the same image (for i386), using ftp.nl.d.o as
mirror without any problems. My log looks similar to you, except that I
get good signatures...
From my log:
Mar 16 17:41:08
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
3. Provide some way for firmware debs to communicate to d-i that they
have a license the user needs to see, and have check-missing-firmware
display these licenses before the firmware is ever used.
This is the option that I have had in the back
301 - 400 of 18898 matches
Mail list logo
