Re: How can I use the GCC -frandom-seed= option with the waf build system?

On 24/9/2022 5:03 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 23/09/2022 20:27, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:49 AM Sebastian Huber >> > > wrote: >> >>     On 23/09/2022 18:47, Karel Gardas wrote: >> > On 9/23/22 18:35, Sebastian Huber

Re: rtems-tester for raspberry pi 4B

On 26/9/2022 1:06 am, Noor Aman wrote: > I wanted to setup rtems-tester for aarch64/raspberry BSP using TFTP/PXE > boot, So I needed help with that. The process is documented here https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/testing/tftp.html. Does this help?? Chris

Re: [PATCH v2] bsp/aarch64: New entry for Raspberry pi 4B AArch64 BSP

Hi, Thanks for this. It is exciting to see this board being supported. Well done getting to a point we can review the changess. My comments are mostly about the commit message :) Is the BSP called `aarch64/raspberrypi4b`? I just want to make sure I am reading the spec files correctly. On

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add application config info directives

On 23/9/2022 4:34 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23.09.22 00:04, Chris Johns wrote: On 22/9/2022 6:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 17/09/2022 09:31, Chris Johns wrote: +.. index:: rtems_configuration_get_rtems_api_configuration() + +.. _InterfaceRtemsConfigurationGetRtemsApiConfiguration

Re: Student difficulty joining items users list.

On 19/9/2022 9:29 pm, andrew.butterfi...@scss.tcd.ie wrote: > Hi all, > > A student of mine is trying to subscribe to this mailing list at > https://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > He adds in his email address, hits “Subscribe” and

Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] New GPIO, ADC API and STM32F4 BSP implementation

On 22/9/2022 11:44 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 4:44 AM Karel Gardas wrote: > > On 9/22/22 10:41, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 22/09/2022 10:30, Karel Gardas wrote: > >> On 9/22/22 00:00, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:12 AM Joel

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add application config info directives

On 22/9/2022 6:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/09/2022 09:31, Chris Johns wrote: >>> +.. index:: rtems_configuration_get_rtems_api_configuration() >>> + >>> +.. _InterfaceRtemsConfigurationGetRtemsApiConfiguration: >>> + >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Microchip PolarFire SoC support

On 21/9/2022 9:47 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Chris did you add it to the bsp-builder configuration? No. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Microchip PolarFire SoC support

On 21/9/2022 3:03 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I have pushed this patch set. Please check that the merge is OK and follow up > with an update to the Users Guide for those looking for this BSP. Thanks. Great to see the addition of this BSP. I have updated the RSB to include this BSP. I have also

Re: RSB build fails on M1 Macbook Pro

On 21/9/2022 1:35 am, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Well, obviously, I would fix that by installing the library. But anyway, gdb > is > IIRC compiled before GCC which probably also means you will be missing mpfr > and > mpc too -- so best way for you may be following >

Re: [PATCH] bsps/arm: Fix start in hypervisor mode

On 20/9/2022 9:12 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Only clear the HSCTLR[TE] bit to take exceptions in A32 state. Keep the > other HSCTLR bits as is since they control the current execution. > Assume that the chip or boot loader did initialize this register > correctly. I think this change should

Re: [xubuntu-users] Xubuntu 20.04 Install Issue

On 21/09/22 10:51, Dick Steffens wrote: On 9/20/22 15:49, Alex Johns wrote: On 21/09/22 05:17, Dick Steffens wrote: I am trying to install Xubuntu 20.04 on a Lenovo Ideapad 330. The base install worked fine. It asked me if I wanted to install updates. I said yes. It proceeded to do

Re: [xubuntu-users] Xubuntu 20.04 Install Issue

On 21/09/22 05:17, Dick Steffens wrote: I am trying to install Xubuntu 20.04 on a Lenovo Ideapad 330. The base install worked fine. It asked me if I wanted to install updates. I said yes. It proceeded to do that for a lot of minutes (I was reading news on another computer, so I don't know

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add application config info directives

On 19/9/2022 5:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/09/2022 09:31, Chris Johns wrote: >>> +rtems_configuration_get_do_zero_of_workspace() >>> +-- >>> + >>> +Indicates if the RTEMS Workspace is configured to be z

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add application config info directives

Hi, Sorry about not reviewing this before now. Thanks for this, it looks good and most welcome. I have raised some general questions that apply to a number of entries. I did not tag every case. On 10/9/22 12:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Close #4267. > Close #4269. > --- >

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd] rtemsbsd/arasan_sd: Prevent disabled device probe

On 16/9/22 6:16 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > Probing a SDIO/SDHCI interface that has been disabled by system init via > holding it in reset can cause a CPU hang. This prevents probing of > devices that have been disabled in such a manner on ZynqMP systems.> --- >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] textproc/gsed: Add GNU sed build support

On 14/9/2022 5:02 pm, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > From: Chris Johns > diff --git a/bare/config/textproc/gsed-internal.bset > b/bare/config/textproc/gsed-internal.bset > new file mode 100644 > index 000..e93e1a5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/bare/config/textproc/gsed-internal

Re: [PATCH 3/3] devel/gcc: Check and build GNU sed if not available on build host

On 15/9/22 9:21 pm, Frank Kühndel wrote: > Hello Chris, > > our CI build the tools (rtems-source-builder git) for revision > > c0edd80bcd27b3dad7ee7acf5ea129e81e6a6f64 "rtems/jpeg: Update the checksum" > > OK and failed for revision > > 468fc79e8c7c8076e8b65be82ba2009e41dd6c8e "devel/gcc:

Re: [PATCH 1/3] sb/setbuilder: Do not install if --no-install option is used

Hi, There is a bug in this change. I will sort it out today. Sorry about this. Chris On 14/9/22 5:02 pm, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > From: Chris Johns > > - This is a bug introduced in the recent bset tar file changes > --- > source-builder/sb/setbuilder.py | 3 ++- >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] devel/gcc: Check and build GNU sed if not available on build host

On 14/9/2022 11:31 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > OK. Hopefully this fixes the MIPS issues. It does on FreeBSD 13.1. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Console Input with xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu

On 14/9/2022 2:45 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022, 6:27 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > On 14/9/2022 7:40 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > This appears to be broken yet again. I am using qemu 5.1.91 built with > the RSB > >

Re: Console Input with xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu

On 14/9/2022 7:40 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > This appears to be broken yet again. I am using qemu 5.1.91 built with the RSB > back in July. Does this work for anyone? > > Advice or (even better) a fix appreciated. It has been broken for a while. I first noticed it after the development branch

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip] lwip.py: Allow lwIP to build against stale install

On 11/9/22 11:30 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On 9/10/2022 20:22, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 10/9/2022 12:07 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: >>> This removes the default BSP include path from environment variables so >>> that rtems-lwip can build even when there's a stale versio

Re: For GSoC: RTEMS release notes new generator

On 1/9/2022 4:43 am, Mahmoud Abumandour wrote: > Hello all, > > Here, I present the current output of the new release notes generator that > will > be used in the release generation process. Thank you. > Currently, the generator is capable > is generating markdown and reStructuredText. Both

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v3 0/7] lwIP port for STM32F4 BSP

The build systems changes look good. Thanks Chris On 9/9/2022 2:34 am, Duc Doan wrote: This patch set aims to port RTEMS lwIP for STM32F4 BSP. It also contains generic drivers for STM32 chips in general. It is tested with a TCP echo server application on STM32F407 Discovery Board.

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip] lwip.py: Allow lwIP to build against stale install

On 10/9/2022 12:07 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: This removes the default BSP include path from environment variables so that rtems-lwip can build even when there's a stale version with outdated headers installed in the BSP. I am not following what this does and what problem you are attempting to

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v3 1/7] lwip.py: Change arch and bsp check method

On 9/9/2022 11:16 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On 9/9/2022 01:46, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 9/9/2022 2:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: >>> At some point, the lwIP build needs to get better about managing which BSPs >>> it >>> supports, but that's not a task for you her

Re: What is meaning / usage of STM32F4_GPIO_CONFIG_TERMINAL

On 9/9/2022 5:48 pm, Y. HB wrote: > Sorry for the last message, it was sent by accident. I have known that the > STM32F4_GPIO_CONFIG_TERMINAL is used inside start-config-io.c, and used as a > termination of set_config_array. No problem and thanks for letting us know. Chris

Re: RSB vs. Python 2.7

On 9/9/2022 3:53 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > On 9/9/2022 3:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 09.09.22 07:49, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 9/9/2022 3:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> it seems that the recent RSB no

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v3 1/7] lwip.py: Change arch and bsp check method

On 9/9/2022 2:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > At some point, the lwIP build needs to get better about managing which BSPs it > supports, but that's not a task for you here and now. I think this is needed. Can lwip be built generically for a BSP that is not specific covered in a list? I ask because

Re: RSB vs. Python 2.7

On 9/9/2022 3:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 09.09.22 07:49, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 9/9/2022 3:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> it seems that the recent RSB no longer runs with Python 2.7: >>> >>> download:https://c

Re: [PATCH] user: Document arm/fvp BSP

Ok to push Thanks Chris On 9/9/2022 3:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Close #4202. > --- > user/bsps/arm/fvp.rst | 39 +++ > user/bsps/bsps-arm.rst | 1 + > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 user/bsps/arm/fvp.rst > > diff --git

Re: RSB vs. Python 2.7

On 9/9/2022 3:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > it seems that the recent RSB no longer runs with Python 2.7: > > download: https://codeload.github.com/RTEMS/gnu-mirror-gcc/tar.gz/6678700: > error: https should be ok with python2? > Is it now time to drop the Python 2 support

Re: [PATCH] user: Document RSB --with/without-newlib-tls

Thanks for adding this. Please push. Chris On 9/9/2022 3:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Update #4560. > --- > user/rsb/project-sets.rst | 9 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/user/rsb/project-sets.rst b/user/rsb/project-sets.rst > index 54a3f8e..ce839c5 100644 > ---

Re: [rtems-source-builder commit] 7: Update Binutils, GDB, and GCC

On 9/9/2022 12:28 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: https://codeload.github.com/RTEMS/sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb/tar.gz/%{binutils_version} > -%hash sha512 %{binutils_expand_name}.tar.gz >

Re: [PATCH 00/15] Synchronize libcrypt and libmd with FreeBSD

On 9/9/2022 12:29 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/09/2022 16:27, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:26 AM Sebastian Huber >> > > wrote: >> >>     On 08/09/2022 16:21, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > Were there no updates to md4/md5 code

Re: [PATCH] score: Improve formatting

On 8/9/2022 5:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 08/09/2022 08:56, Chris Johns wrote: Is the score going to be run through clang-format? I gave up finding the proper clang-format configuration which is close to the RTEMS style. I thought it was decided to get as close as possible and adjust

Re: [PATCH] score: Improve formatting

Hi, Is the score going to be run through clang-format? If it is should we bother going this? Chris On 8/9/2022 4:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: --- cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: bsp builder and versal ilp32

On 8/9/2022 9:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 4:47 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 8/9/2022 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > Do these references to the ilp32 need to be removed? >

Re: [rtems-tools] rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini, rtems-bsps-tiers.ini: Remove versal ilp32 variants

OK Thanks Chris On 8/9/2022 1:02 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > --- > config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini | 12 > config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini | 5 ++--- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini >

Re: bsp builder and versal ilp32

On 8/9/2022 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > Do these references to the ilp32 need to be removed? > > rtems-tools]$ grep -r ilp32 | grep versal > config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini:       xilinx_versal_ilp32_qemu, > xilinx_versal_ilp32_vck190, > config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini:    

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v2 1/7] lwip.py: Change arch and bsp check method

On 7/9/2022 4:41 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: I'm not opposed to this change since it reduces repetition a bit, but was there a particular reason for it beyond that? Yes there is. The arch/bsp checks ... -    if bld.env.RTEMS_ARCH_BSP.startswith('arm-rtems6-tms570ls3137_hdk'): ... included the

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add support for VRSAVE

On 6/9/2022 3:38 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/09/2022 07:29, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 5/9/2022 4:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 03/09/2022 01:17, Chris Johns wrote: >>>> On 2/9/2022 2:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>> On 02.09.22 06:22, Se

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add support for VRSAVE

On 5/9/2022 4:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 03/09/2022 01:17, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 2/9/2022 2:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 02.09.22 06:22, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> On 02.09.22 04:22, Chris Johns wrote: >>>>> On 1/9/2022 6:26 pm, Seb

Re: [xubuntu-users] gimp-helping "not available" ...in Firefox 104.0.1

On 5/09/22 22:07, Hans Schneidhofer wrote: Hi, I think my next distribution for all my work will be even debian. Because there are no needs for snap or flatpak. My other PC with debian 11 works now for years with soundstudio - without aany problems. I think I will also convert my current

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip 4/5] lwip.py: Add STM32 lwIP port to build

On 4/9/2022 11:25 am, Duc Doan wrote: > --- > lwip.py | 20 +++- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lwip.py b/lwip.py > index 84eef2c..d806b64 100644 > --- a/lwip.py > +++ b/lwip.py > @@ -92,6 +92,17 @@ common_source_files = [ >

Re: [RBW] Re: Tektro R559 - Cable Anchor Bolt Replacement?

are clear from the rim. JohnS On Friday, September 2, 2022 at 12:10:32 PM UTC-4 Coal Bee Rye Anne wrote: > Generally speaking, I can at least confirm the anchor bolts can be > replaced, in a pinch (pun intended,) with a m5 bolt and washer. I mention > this alternative simply because thi

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add support for VRSAVE

On 2/9/2022 2:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 02.09.22 06:22, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 02.09.22 04:22, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 1/9/2022 6:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> The VRSAVE feature of the Altivec unit can be used to reduce the amount of >

[RBW] Re: Rat Trap Pass

It does look like there would be enough room for the 2.3 RTP. Do you know which rims they are using? Seems to me they should be Cliffhangers for that wide of a tire, but they say they build the bike with Dyads. Thanks, JohnS On Friday, September 2, 2022 at 7:49:39 AM UTC-4 R. Alexis wrote

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add support for VRSAVE

On 1/9/2022 6:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > The VRSAVE feature of the Altivec unit can be used to reduce the amount of > Altivec registers which need to be saved/restored during interrupt processing > and context switches. Which BSPs and hardware has this been tested on? Thanks Chris

[RBW] Re: Rat Trap Pass

Hello Thomas, Sorry, I don't have an extra pair of RTP for you. But I'm not sure they would fit on the XOXO, looks like the max tire width is 1.75". JohnS On Thursday, September 1, 2022 at 2:32:25 PM UTC-4 tommc...@gmail.com wrote: > Alright, my curiosity has finally gotten the be

Re: libgcrypt and rtems?

On 31/8/2022 11:37 am, Scott Zemerick wrote: > Hello!  I am interested if anyone has utilized libgcrypt > (https://github.com/gpg/libgcrypt ) with > rtems?  And as a followup question, if not libgcrypt, what crypto library are > you using successfully?  We ask

Re: [rtems commit] spec/librtemscpu: Fix installed headers

On 31/8/2022 4:57 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 30/08/2022 19:55, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 8:12 AM Sebastian Huber >> > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: >> >>     On 22/08/2022 01:30, Chris Johns wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip] lwip.py: Track includes as lists

OK Thanks Chris On 31/8/2022 3:21 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > The original work for rtems-lwip tracked include directories as raw > strings to be passed into the build infrastructure. This reformulates > include directory management as lists to reduce errors in future > changes. > --- > lwip.py |

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip] lwip.py: Address python formatting issues

On 30/8/2022 11:09 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: > I'll go ahead and get this committed and then address the strings issue in > another patch. Good idea. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH v2] score: Do not expose to

Looks good and thanks Is this in the coding standard? Chris On 29/8/2022 6:25 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > The header file should not unnecessarily include standard C > header files. The and header includes were > removed in 2017. > > Update #4662. > --- >

Re: [rtems commit] schedulerpriority.h: Fix gcc 12 warning

On 30/8/2022 6:39 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:41 AM Sebastian Huber > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> > wrote: > > On 29/08/2022 09:30, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 29/8/22 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip] lwip.py: Address python formatting issues

On 30/8/2022 4:30 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > --- > lwip.py | 106 > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lwip.py b/lwip.py > index f8d8eb0..2e12957 100644 > --- a/lwip.py > +++ b/lwip.py > @@ -29,43 +29,50 @@

Re: [rtems commit] schedulerpriority.h: Fix gcc 12 warning

On 29/8/22 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 19/08/2022 22:46, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Module:    rtems >> Branch:    master >> Commit:    5b875915152a248079855bcb98e871f70ac314cc >> Changeset: >> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=5b875915152a248079855bcb98e871f70ac314cc >> >> Author:   

Re: [PATCH] score: Do not expose to

Hi, Welcome back :) Could you please explain in the commit message the reason? It makes it easier for me or anyone else to understand the reasons. Thanks Chris On 29/8/22 5:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Update #4662. > --- > cpukit/include/rtems/score/interr.h | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1

Re: Weird Cygwin Build Failure

On 27/8/2022 11:15 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022, 8:14 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 27/8/2022 12:13 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2022-August/035493

Re: [PATCH RTEMS 5] cpukit/include: Fix including in C++

On 27/8/2022 11:13 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I'm ok with these but which were actually causing trouble? The watchdog, the left and the capture engine include cause the orginal problem. I fixed those and some others on 6 then backported those that applied to 5. OK to push? Chris

Re: Weird Cygwin Build Failure

On 27/8/2022 12:13 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2022-August/035493.html > -- m68k on > Cygwin fails with this weird error.  > > > > > rm gcc.pod > make[2]: Leaving

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v3] lwip.py: Build BSD compatibility as part of lwIP

On 27/8/2022 7:25 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > Include the BSD compatibility functions as part of lwIP to be provided > to consumers of this network stack and install the headers so they can > be compiled against. > --- > lwip.py | 9 +++-- >

Re: [PATCH v1] bsps/amd64: remove -Werror from ABI flags

Stephen, The email address in the patch is not yours or not set on your system and the commit message line length exceeds 80 characters. It has been pushed and cannot be changed so it would be good if you could please check your set up to make sure patches are suitable for the repo. Thanks Chris

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v1 0/5] Clean and update lwIP import

Looks good. Thanks Chris On 26/8/2022 5:43 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > This patch set finishes cleaning up the imported lwIP code by removing > extraneous changes and updates to the latest release. This also fixes a > bug preventing compilation with earlier versions of Python. > > >

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v1 1/8] lwip.py: Add library and compile flags

On 24/8/2022 10:32 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On 8/23/2022 21:24, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 24/8/2022 5:47 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: >>> +    section_flags = ["-fdata-sections", "-ffunction-sections"] >> This is triggering a tweak ... >> https://gi

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v2 0/6] Prepare for NTP library usage

Looks good to me. Thanks Chris On 25/8/2022 1:47 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > This v2 patch set addresses Chris's comments from the previous patch set > and drops the NTP-specific patches for further consideration in regard > to the path forward for EPICS7. > >

Re: fnmatch.h not found on MINGW64

On 24/8/2022 5:53 am, Ryan Long wrote: > When I try to include fnmatch.h, I'm getting the following error when using > x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc or gcc, I'm getting the following error. I have to > manually include /usr/include with -I. Does anyone know a way to fix this? I would not add

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v1 7/8] lwip.py: Add NTP library build

On 24/8/2022 5:47 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > diff --git a/ntp-file-import.yaml b/ntp-file-import.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000..5e4e8a4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/ntp-file-import.yaml Sorry the existing YAML support has to be removed or maybe you could merge into the repo

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v1 1/8] lwip.py: Add library and compile flags

On 24/8/2022 5:47 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > This allows linking with libm and follows the RTEMS convention of > compiling with function sections for linking optimization and dead code > removal. > --- > lwip.py | 11 +++ > wscript | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1

Re: [PATCH rtems-lwip v1 0/8] NTP library support

On 24/8/2022 5:47 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > This patch set cleans up the lwIP source imports, switches rtems-lwip > over to using the tools headers for network structures, and brings in > Sebastian Huber's work on the NTP client for rtems-libbsd along with the > support necessary to compile it. I

Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Change to QEMU 5

OK Thanks Chris On 23/8/2022 6:29 am, Ryan Long wrote: > Hi, > > For this patchset I changed the hash of the glib hash because it has changed > and it doesn't work on Debian 11, Ubuntu 22.04, and CentOS 8 Stream. > > After fixing the glib hash, I continued to run into other errors. So I

Re: rtems-tools: DWARF5 support in Elftoolchain

On 23/8/2022 2:39 am, Ryan Long wrote: > Covoar has been unable to run after upgrading to GCC 12 because by default it > generates DWARF5 debug info. Covoar uses libdwarf from Elftoolchain to read > the > debug info, and libdwarf only supports DWARF versions 2 through 4. > > I submitted a ticket

Re: [PATCH] Change DWARF version to 5

On 23/8/2022 6:31 am, Ryan Long wrote: > This is a termporary fix while we wait for it to be fixed up stream. Covoar > will not run without this at the moment. We don't know if the error occurred > with any other Elf tools. > > Updates #4707 > --- >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tester: Add option to specify how to load image with QEMU

OK for this change. I am not sure about the other one so I will leave that for someone who knows. If no one says anything in the next day please push both. Thanks Chris On 20/8/2022 12:16 am, Daniel Cederman wrote: > Defaults to "-kernel", but can be changed to, for example, "-bios". > --- >

Re: -Werror on amd64 BSP makes it to installed package configuration file

On 20/8/2022 6:07 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022, 3:00 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 20 Aug 2022, at 3:39 am, Joel Sherrill <mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > > > Hi > > >

Re: -Werror on amd64 BSP makes it to installed package configuration file

> On 20 Aug 2022, at 3:39 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > Stephen tripped across this and I'm reporting it because it is going to > take some discussion to resolve. > > Stephen is using the .pc files to create a configuration file > for the FACE Conformance Test Suite. This is now

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] malloctest/init.c: Added pragmas to address gcc 12 warnings

On 19/8/2022 9:02 am, Ryan Long wrote: > On 8/16/2022 10:55 PM, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 17/8/2022 12:16 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022, 6:07 PM Chris Johns >> <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: >>> On 17/8/2022 6:11 am, Ryan

Re: [RBW] Randonneuring Bike

Hello Dick, Sorry, no experience with riding a Riv for a brevet, but last year I did ride a 200K on a Crust Lighting Bolt Canti without any issues. Very comfortable with RH Babyshoe Pass tires. Highly recommend it. JohnS On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 6:06:49 PM UTC-4 campyo...@me.com wrote

Re: libbsd fails to link on i386

On 18/8/2022 7:23 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I think the wrong bus.h must be being included somewhere. These are static > inline methods on the i386. Hopefully a simple patch for someone who knows > what > to do: Could it be installed with the BSP? Does it happen with a clean prefix? Chris

Re: [PATCH] 6: Enable some libstdc++ features

On 12/8/2022 12:48 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On 08.08.22 13:46, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> Enable TLS support for all RTEMS targets except bfin, lm32, m68k, mips, >> moxie, >> or1k, and v850.  For all RTEMS targets, define HAVE_ALIGNED_ALLOC, >> HAVE_AT_QUICK_EXIT, HAVE_LINK,

Re: [PATCH RSB] Fixes for getting sources

On 17/8/2022 12:13 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022, 6:34 PM mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > wrote: > > Hi > > These patches fix getting sources for all the packages so releases > can be CI tested to catch breakages closer to the time they happen. > > > Thanks. I didn't

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] malloctest/init.c: Added pragmas to address gcc 12 warnings

On 17/8/2022 12:16 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022, 6:07 PM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > On 17/8/2022 6:11 am, Ryan Long wrote: > > Fixed four warnings disabled were for "-Wuse-after-free" and one for a

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] malloctest/init.c: Added pragmas to address gcc 12 warnings

On 17/8/2022 6:11 am, Ryan Long wrote: > Fixed four warnings disabled were for "-Wuse-after-free" and one for a > "-Wfree-nonheap-object." Is this a gcc warning bug? If p1 was used to access the memory the warning is right but we are only referencing the address and not the data. It is no

Re: Converting custom Appender to Log4j v2

Actually created new logger from scratch through code: Here is relevant code where pLogFilename is something like "MyServer.log" public static void initialize(String pLogFilename, String pConfigurationFilename) throws IOException { // Make sure the filename has the proper date

Re: Converting custom Appender to Log4j v2

Yeah. You can't do that. I had that problem too - you have to find a new way to do in log4j. I can't look now, but I will find what I did and post it tomorrow. Don't waste time trying to find a similar mechanism - it was something rather different. On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:18 PM Gary Gregory

Re: rtems-docs fail to build

On 13/8/2022 1:24 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 1:06 AM Chris Johns <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > I will also push a change to the pdflatex build that sets the TEXINPUTS > env > variable to include some sphinx latex support that was bein

Re: rtems-docs fail to build

Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> > Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:20:52 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH rtems-docs] versions: Update arm > > Error output followed by git bisect. > > Build: 6.f028448 (3rd August 2022) > [4/7] Compiling build/user/latex

Re: [rtems-tools PATCH] rtemstoolkit: Fix conditions using "is" with literals

OK and thanks Chris On 12/8/2022 5:26 am, Ryan Long wrote: > Fix warnings that come from python 3.8 about using the "is" operator with > string literals. > > Closes #4700 > --- > rtemstoolkit/config.py | 2 +- > rtemstoolkit/macros.py | 58 > +-

Re: [rtems-tools 5 PATCH] Python 3.8 warning about "is" vs "==" in comparisons of literals

OK and thanks Chris On 12/8/2022 5:25 am, Ryan Long wrote: > From: Konrad Schwarz > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Schwarz > > Closes #4692 > --- > rtemstoolkit/config.py | 2 +- > rtemstoolkit/macros.py | 58 > +- > 2 files changed, 30

Re: [PATCH] 6: Enable some libstdc++ features

On 12/8/2022 12:48 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On 08.08.22 13:46, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> Enable TLS support for all RTEMS targets except bfin, lm32, m68k, mips, >> moxie, >> or1k, and v850.  For all RTEMS targets, define HAVE_ALIGNED_ALLOC, >> HAVE_AT_QUICK_EXIT, HAVE_LINK,

Re: [PATCH 1/1] build/cpukit: Add confdefs/face.h to install rule

Looks good and thanks for fixing this. I will push it. Chris On 11/8/2022 3:37 pm, Duc Doan wrote: > Updates #4691 > --- > spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml > b/spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml > index

Re: rtems-central: spec2modules crash

On 11/8/2022 6:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I feel like an old man yelling at clouds TikTok? Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [rtems-docs PATCH] loader.rst: Add documentation for AArch64 support

On 10/8/2022 11:39 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I'm ok with this but would like an ack from someone else. Sorry, I missed this. OK to push :) Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Adding third-party source with Apache-2.0 license

On 7/8/2022 10:20 pm, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: > Am 07.08.22 um 13:06 schrieb Duc Doan: >> Dear all, >> >> I am working on a project that needs to include ST's STM32F4 HAL into >> RTEMS, specifically release v1.27.1 at: >> https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32CubeF4. However, the CMSIS >>

Re: [PATCH] cpukit/dev/can: Added CAN support

Hi Could you please configure your email client to not send HTML emails to the list? I am reluctant to enable filtering in mailman and have managed to avoid it so far. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: [PATCH] testsuite/psxclock: Check setting realtime clock

On 4/8/2022 3:56 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On 02/08/2022 02:42, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >> This patch adds a test to make sure threads sleeping on a >> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME) call are not effected by a >> change in the realtime clock via the

Re: i2c device initialization on MVME3100 RTEMS5 (presumably also in 6?)

On 3/8/2022 9:52 pm, Heinz Junkes wrote: > We had a problem initialising the i2c devices on the MVME3100. > Unfortunately, I still don't understand the order of initialisation. > > However, the direct driver initialisation from bspstart no longer worked as > it did with older versions. > > My

Re: [PATCH] posix: Fix relative CLOCK_REALTIME sleep

On 1/8/2022 6:52 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 01/08/2022 10:48, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 1/8/2022 6:20 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 01/08/2022 10:16, Chris Johns wrote: >>>> On 1/8/2022 5:22 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>> A relative

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >