@@ -558,8 +558,8 @@ func.func @deinterleave(%a: vector<4xf32>) ->
(vector<2xf32>, vector<2xf32>) {
// CHECK-LABEL: func @deinterleave_scalar
// CHECK-SAME: (%[[ARG0:.+]]: vector<2xf32>)
-// CHECK: %[[EXTRACT0:.*]] = spirv.CompositeExtract %[[ARG0]][0 : i32] :
vector<2x
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108381
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108359
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -935,8 +909,10 @@ struct ConversionPatternRewriterImpl : public
RewriterBase::Listener {
/// to modify/access them is invalid rewriter API usage.
SetVector replacedOps;
- /// A set of all unresolved materializations.
- DenseSet unresolvedMaterializations;
+ /// A ma
https://github.com/joker-eph closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106589
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106589
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#105745
Some bots are broken apparently.
>From 89a7a0b178e406164641e3f88bd5694994b15ba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mehdi Amini
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:29:20 -0700
Subj
joker-eph wrote:
LG!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106454
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106454
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -143,15 +140,76 @@ formatv_object_base::splitLiteralAndReplacement(StringRef
Fmt) {
return std::make_pair(ReplacementItem{Fmt}, StringRef());
}
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+#define ENABLE_VALIDATION 1
+#else
+#define ENABLE_VALIDATION 1 // Convienently enable validation in release m
@@ -143,15 +140,76 @@ formatv_object_base::splitLiteralAndReplacement(StringRef
Fmt) {
return std::make_pair(ReplacementItem{Fmt}, StringRef());
}
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+#define ENABLE_VALIDATION 1
+#else
+#define ENABLE_VALIDATION 1 // Convienently enable validation in release m
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ DWARFUnit::GetDIE(dw_offset_t die_offset) {
if (!ContainsDIEOffset(die_offset)) {
GetSymbolFileDWARF().GetObjectFile()->GetModule()->ReportError(
-"GetDIE for DIE {0:x16} is outside of its CU {0:x16}", die_offset,
+"GetDIE for DIE {0:x
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ DWARFUnit::GetDIE(dw_offset_t die_offset) {
if (!ContainsDIEOffset(die_offset)) {
GetSymbolFileDWARF().GetObjectFile()->GetModule()->ReportError(
-"GetDIE for DIE {0:x16} is outside of its CU {0:x16}", die_offset,
+"GetDIE for DIE {0:x
joker-eph wrote:
Having this enabled guarded by NDEBUG seems like a good option. There is
already some things already like this isn't there? I kind of remember that
using imbalanced `{` / `}` pair of something like that was checked only in
assert builds?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
joker-eph wrote:
Having this enabled guarded by NDEBUG seems like a good option. There is
already some things already like this isn't there? I kind of remember that
using imbalanced `{` / `}` pair of something like that was checked only in
assert builds?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
joker-eph wrote:
Possible, let's try it there then
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joker-eph wrote:
Possible, let's try it there then
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -67,92 +68,123 @@ formatv_object_base::parseReplacementItem(StringRef Spec) {
StringRef Options;
size_t Index = 0;
RepString = RepString.trim();
- if (RepString.consumeInteger(0, Index)) {
-assert(false && "Invalid replacement sequence index!");
-return Replac
@@ -67,92 +68,123 @@ formatv_object_base::parseReplacementItem(StringRef Spec) {
StringRef Options;
size_t Index = 0;
RepString = RepString.trim();
- if (RepString.consumeInteger(0, Index)) {
-assert(false && "Invalid replacement sequence index!");
-return Replac
https://github.com/joker-eph commented:
Thanks, I'm wondering about the cost of this: what does it do to some
compile-time tests with clang for example?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.ll
@@ -67,92 +68,123 @@ formatv_object_base::parseReplacementItem(StringRef Spec) {
StringRef Options;
size_t Index = 0;
RepString = RepString.trim();
- if (RepString.consumeInteger(0, Index)) {
-assert(false && "Invalid replacement sequence index!");
-return Replac
https://github.com/joker-eph commented:
Thanks, I'm wondering about the cost of this: what does it do to some
compile-time tests with clang for example?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.
@@ -67,92 +68,123 @@ formatv_object_base::parseReplacementItem(StringRef Spec) {
StringRef Options;
size_t Index = 0;
RepString = RepString.trim();
- if (RepString.consumeInteger(0, Index)) {
-assert(false && "Invalid replacement sequence index!");
-return Replac
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
joker-eph wrote:
CI failed FYI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joker-eph wrote:
CI failed FYI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105745
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
In the last changes you made, you set a default bool variable in the else
statement. That's why I'm getting a warning message. When I tried changing
the compiler flag it didn't work.
*export CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -Wno-error"*
Do you have any advice on this subject? Thank you very much in advance.
*ed
joker-eph wrote:
> The motivation is as usual IWYU and similar refactoring - to reduce build
> time and probablility of non-related source(s) recompile.
I'm confused: as far as I know IWYU achieves the opposite of what you're
describing actually: it adds more includes than strictly necessary.
joker-eph wrote:
Hi, thanks for trying to cleanup the codebase.
Can you provide more context on the motivation / what you're trying to achieve
here?
Did you know that LLVM intentionally does not follow IWYU and favors forward
declarations:
https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#include-
Public bug reported:
Hello,
I hope this is the right place to report this, since i don't know if
this could be called a bug per say...
- Under 'Ubuntu Desktop Guide > Visual overview of GNOME > Activities
overview' :
« At the bottom of the overview, you will find the dash. »
On my freshly
Public bug reported:
Hello,
I hope this is the right place to report this, since i don't know if
this could be called a bug per say...
- Under 'Ubuntu Desktop Guide > Visual overview of GNOME > Activities
overview' :
« At the bottom of the overview, you will find the dash. »
On my freshly
joker-eph wrote:
It seems that this broke the CI:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/3898
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99898
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
read.
Thanks for taking the time and sharing.
Mehdi
Original Message
From: Behdad Esfahbod
Sent: 9 July 2024 04:03:59 CEST
To: "harfbuzz@lists.freedesktop.org" ,
freetype-devel , cairo ,
Gtk+ Developers , lett...@lwn.net
Subject: State of Text Rendering 2024
Hi,
I&
@@ -322,24 +306,20 @@ struct hash_state {
}
};
-
-/// A global, fixed seed-override variable.
-///
-/// This variable can be set using the \see llvm::set_fixed_execution_seed
-/// function. See that function for details. Do not, under any circumstances,
-/// set or read this
joker-eph wrote:
The premerge config seems broken because of this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96282
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96388
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#95025 ; many bots are broken
>From b9ceb93bc8d7fe75365f0d9002ed8b48a0884c85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mehdi Amini
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:18:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] =?UT
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94886
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
** Changed in: qwt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039595
Title:
Update qwt to 6.3.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
joker-eph wrote:
Reverted in 7d4a45d98275e669bda40410f064891beb3480ce ; test is failing like
this on Windows:
```
# RUN: at line 3
c:\ws\buildbot\premerge-monolithic-windows\build\bin\clang.exe -cc1
-internal-isystem
C:\ws\buildbot\premerge-monolithic-windows\build\lib\clang\19\include
-nost
Author: Mehdi Amini
Date: 2024-05-29T21:56:59-07:00
New Revision: 7d4a45d98275e669bda40410f064891beb3480ce
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7d4a45d98275e669bda40410f064891beb3480ce
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7d4a45d98275e669bda40410f064891beb3480ce.diff
joker-eph wrote:
Reverted in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93767
(maybe it's just a missing explicit triple in the test?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
https://github.com/joker-eph closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93767
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#87018
MacOS and Windows bots are broken.
>From a35c320e18ba2abad17eab0ed162c4115601a828 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mehdi Amini
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 22:47:35 -0600
Subj
joker-eph wrote:
It also fails on Windows:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/271/builds/8095
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
joker-eph wrote:
There is a broken test in CI:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/272/builds/17864
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81545
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
@@ -1053,3 +1055,241 @@ LogicalResult mlir::applyOpPatternsAndFold(
});
return converged;
}
+
+//===--===//
+// One-Shot Dialect Conversion Infrastructure
+//===-
@@ -1053,3 +1055,241 @@ LogicalResult mlir::applyOpPatternsAndFold(
});
return converged;
}
+
+//===--===//
+// One-Shot Dialect Conversion Infrastructure
+//===-
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89749
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
joker-eph wrote:
What part of the "camelBack" is visible to the user of the API?
(and in general the method prototype in the header should likely use the same
parameter names as the implementation file)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91007
___
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ function compute-projects-to-test() {
done
;;
clang)
- for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt flang lldb cross-project-tests; do
+ for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt lldb cross-project-tests; do
joker-eph wrote:
>
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ function compute-projects-to-test() {
done
;;
clang)
- for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt flang lldb cross-project-tests; do
+ for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt lldb cross-project-tests; do
joker-eph wrote:
To
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ function compute-projects-to-test() {
done
;;
clang)
- for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt flang lldb cross-project-tests; do
+ for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt lldb cross-project-tests; do
joker-eph wrote:
>
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ function compute-projects-to-test() {
done
;;
clang)
- for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt flang lldb cross-project-tests; do
+ for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt lldb cross-project-tests; do
joker-eph wrote:
Th
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ function compute-projects-to-test() {
done
;;
clang)
- for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt flang lldb cross-project-tests; do
+ for p in clang-tools-extra compiler-rt lldb cross-project-tests; do
joker-eph wrote:
Ca
joker-eph wrote:
> It's a sed s/== None/is None/g - what is there to review?
On my I'm not asking for more reviews, this is why I commented that this should
be **pushed** in multiple commits, I don't even need to see PRs.
Another thing also mentioned above was the problem of reverts.
If there
joker-eph wrote:
> It's a sed s/== None/is None/g - what is there to review?
On my I'm not asking for more reviews, this is why I commented that this should
be **pushed** in multiple commits, I don't even need to see PRs.
Another thing also mentioned above was the problem of reverts.
If there
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
If you can push this to main in separate commits (one per project as it was
mentioned?), that'd be great!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
If you can push this to main in separate commits (one per project as it was
mentioned?), that'd be great!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commi
joker-eph wrote:
You're right, it's visible on the link I posted, the build was already broken!
Somehow I fat-fingered and didn't hit the first red build but the third one!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
c
joker-eph wrote:
Great, thanks for the quick fix!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joker-eph wrote:
So are we reverting here or do you have quick fix available?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joker-eph wrote:
Seems like a bot is broken:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/271/builds/7701 ; can you check?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
Author: Mehdi Amini
Date: 2024-05-14T19:53:38-07:00
New Revision: eb103104ef08ebc2d0de63db0592e76b294cf8bb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eb103104ef08ebc2d0de63db0592e76b294cf8bb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eb103104ef08ebc2d0de63db0592e76b294cf8bb.diff
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91007
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -42,6 +47,14 @@ CreateFrontendBaseAction(CompilerInstance &CI) {
StringRef Action("unknown");
(void)Action;
+ auto UseCIR = CI.getFrontendOpts().UseClangIRPipeline;
joker-eph wrote:
MLIR isn't meant to differ from LLVM/Clang.
> Coding standard doesn'
** Summary changed:
- Update qwt to 6.2.0
+ Update qwt to 6.3.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039595
Title:
Update qwt to 6.3.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
joker-eph wrote:
Actually your premerge failure here was an infra issue, but the CI is still
broken after this PR somehow:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/271/builds/7420
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
___
cfe-commits mailin
joker-eph wrote:
CI failure wasn't unrelated actually: the CI is consistently broken after this
patch (you have got an email about it?), I'll revert for now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91316
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
hi andy did you managed to find the ISO 26623 ?
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 9:32 PM andy pugh wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 18:04, Roland Jollivet
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't know if you adopted Capto from scratch, or had some already, but
> as
> > a new tooling system did you consider the Kenname
joker-eph wrote:
PR should be named according to what they are actually achieving, I'm not sure
why the GitHub issue title is relevant?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
joker-eph wrote:
PR should be named according to what they are actually achieving, I'm not sure
why the GitHub issue title is relevant?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90391
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89424
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
joker-eph wrote:
LG, but please make sure to remove all spurious headers from the commit
description (seems like it should start at "This PR massively ...")
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89424
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-bran
@@ -228,6 +332,7 @@ void TestDialect::initialize() {
>();
registerOpsSyntax();
addOperations();
+ registerTestDialectOperations(this);
joker-eph wrote:
This the actual "magic" right? You're calling into the generated registration
method which dispa
joker-eph wrote:
This seems to have broken the bot:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476 (you should have had an email?)
I reverted in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89378
___
cfe-
https://github.com/joker-eph closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#89378
Broke the windows premerge checks
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/271/builds/6788
>From 7897826aa7931ffc854a88b20e5ab8bf976ad093 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Me
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY InstCombinerImpl final
Value *foldAndOrOfICmpsOfAndWithPow2(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,
Instruction *CxtI, bool IsAnd,
bool IsLogical = false);
-
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//===- CIRDialect.td - CIR dialect -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//===- CIRDialect.td - CIR dialect -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
joker-eph wrote:
This broke a bot, I reverted and it's back green here:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/272/builds/14069
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87130
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/joker-eph closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
:00:00 2001
From: Mehdi Amini
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:44:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[Sema] Mark alias/ifunc targets used and consider
mangled names"
This reverts commit 2ac562ab784c6bf04e6d3026c567d3552a735668.
---
clang/lib/Sema/CMakeLists.txt | 1 -
c
our me dire ce qui vous a fait dire
"Je laisse ça pour d'autres", ou "non je ne peux pas" ou quelque chose qui
a fait que je n'ai aucune espèce de réponse.
Bref, une sorte de post-mortem de la recherche de stage.
Merci d'avance.
T: @mguiraud | m. 06 95 92 51 33
joker-eph wrote:
Can you provide a test that exercises this? Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87976
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-com
@@ -69,6 +69,74 @@ def ReductionClauseInterface :
OpInterface<"ReductionClauseInterface"> {
];
}
+def LoopWrapperInterface : OpInterface<"LoopWrapperInterface"> {
+ let description = [{
+OpenMP operations that can wrap a single loop nest. When taking a wrapper
+rol
Glaxnimate, downloaded from
https://glaxnimate.mattbas.org/download/ has some signing issues and start with
a crash.
Eugen
Am 01.04.2024 um 12:18 schrieb Mehdi Haghgoo:
>
Time time I checked, i couldn't make that work on Mac. Glaxnimate didn't even
execute on Mac.
It would b
Time time I checked, i couldn't make that work on Mac. Glaxnimate didn't even
execute on Mac. It would be nice if the drawing features become part of the app
itself I mean.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 13:36, Julius Künzel
wrote: Hi!
Have checked out Kdenlive's integration with Glaxnimate? I
Hi,
I have been a long-time user of Kdenlive and have praised the software most of
the time. It's become quite stable and trustworthy piece of software. Despite
its small size, the app does an incredible job Linux, Windows and Mac. However,
there is something I have missed a lot in the app and
1 - 100 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
