-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:34:38 +0100
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20050111-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
This is documented in the cryptsetup package.
I don't think dmsetup needs to document these features since they are not
very useful without the hash functions, etc.
I would close this bug if I was maintainer. :-)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
'
This causes a big mess of error messages for systems using cryptsetup.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:24:49 +0100
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20050111-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
it when mount supports cryptsetup.
Bye!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, there will be several packages to build.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
-program optimization. Their (valid
imo) argument is that requiring a powerful build machine is better than
requiring a powerful machine to run the resulting binary.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
to show that for ppc, MLton is desirable. =)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
,
shiny RAM chip in its stocking? =)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
in a special form
In this reply I try to use exactly those phrases and never 'code' alone.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:42:27PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I am concerned about is the following scenario:
Mr. John Wontshare writes a streaming
the intention and degree of dependency be
considered in determining if the client was a derivative work or not?
What can I do to prevent the above scenario from happening?
Thank you very much for your time!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
don't share to freeload off my work.
I personally hate any kind of algorithm patent, so I wouldn't opt for
that solution. I just included it as an option for completeness.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the intention and degree of dependency be
considered in determining if the client was a derivative work or not?
What can I do to prevent the above scenario from happening?
Thank you very much for your time!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
don't share to freeload off my work.
I personally hate any kind of algorithm patent, so I wouldn't opt for
that solution. I just included it as an option for completeness.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ships with one of them, his intention seems to be clear.
I don't see how that is logically inconsistent.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. The difference between first and second degree murder is
one of intention. Though that's a bit dramatic, I think the same sort of
thing applies here.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:27:25PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Wesley W. Terpstra dijo [Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 09:59:36PM +0200]:
At this point my question is only academic; the pure-gcc in main,
icc-prebuilt in contrib solution seems to solve my concerns just as well.
I have only one concern
conclusion too.
Thanks again!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:59:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
Possibly; however, I think bandwidth grows far slower than CPU speed and
overall system power. I do understand your concern, though.
I intend to find out his
conclusion too.
Thanks again!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
why. Now I can explain
it better. The proposal of keeping one version in main and one in contrib
also addresses my concern about usability.
So, I am happy with the outcome of this discussion already. =)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
imaginative person; I am sure there are many other
situations where this could be applied.
From another point of view, research doesn't *need* to be practical. ;)
If other people have ideas, I'd like to hear them.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
why. Now I can explain
it better. The proposal of keeping one version in main and one in contrib
also addresses my concern about usability.
So, I am happy with the outcome of this discussion already. =)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
the algorithm will the
code be released under the GPL.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can only have a copy after I publish. ;)
Thank you for your detailed explanation and answer.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
in contrib solution seems to solve my concerns just as well.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
'2 is intended to suggest.
Rather, it transforms a file into a stream of user-defined-size packets
which goes on practically forever. ANY of the packets will do to get back
the original file, as long as the sum is the same size.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 07:45:39PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:59:42AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
To which, I say, wtf!
You're using it wrong.
Well thank goodness, b/c otherwise that would be really awful. :)
This gives me a great source to compare my
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:49:09AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
I would wager that par is using the Berklekamp-Masey algorithm for decoding;
That would be Berlekamp-Massey. Appologies to both.
I should add their names to my spell checker. =)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:49:09AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
find -name testing.part.\* -print0 | xargs -0 parchive a -n 16384 testing.par
After taking a look in the source code for par, I found this in rs.c:
|*| Calculations over a Galois Field, GF(8)
What does that mean? It means
the algorithm will the
code be released under the GPL.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can only have a copy after I publish. ;)
Thank you for your detailed explanation and answer.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
software and yet
can develop 64bit applications.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-amd64-k8
Severity: serious
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-amd64-k8: Depends: kernel-headers-2.6.8-2 but it is
not installable
E: Broken packages
I see from the changelog the comment:
- Removed i386 from architecture
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:39:21 +0200
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:41:04 +0200
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:14:30 +0200
Source: bidentd
Binary: bidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:52:25 +0200
Source: st
Binary: libst1 libst-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:40:26 +0200
Source: st
Binary: libst1 libst-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the mico package.
The package description is:
The acronym MICO expands to MICO Is CORBA. The intention of this project is
to provide a freely available and fully compliant implementation of the
CORBA standard. MICO has become quite popular as
Actually I'm not certain about #266540.
Certainly #266591 is caused by it though.
Possibly also #264339.
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 03:26:24PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
Oh, btw the release critical bug #266540 which is holding up
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686 from testing is caused b/c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 02:46:32 +0200
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:07:36PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
I've also put it online so you can check the context:
http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/splash/index.hu.html
Due to changes needed for the Spanish people, I also had to change the
template a bit. Here's the hu.xml that I put
code, so I'll get back to you on this.
Thanks!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:22:05AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:50:18AM -0300, Marco Carvalho wrote:
I translate the xml file to Brazilian Portuguese (pt-BR).
Did some more reading up, now I see that pt-BR is perfectly fine, and the
program has to change. =)
I
the older(?) copy on gluck and moved what was there to
it.xml.confused.
Could you perhaps email me a copy of it.xml which is up-to-date with
whatever corrections you've made and is in UTF-8 format?
I'll put it online and make sure things are still working.
Sorry for the confusion.
--
Wesley W
that is necessary. If you have a people.debian.org account, it can
also be done online/interactively.
PS. I know this is ignorant, but where is Catalan spoken? Is it a common
language outside of debian? (I had never heard of it before adding
debian-users-catalan to the archive)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL
, but it has some nice people. :-)
If it's ok with you, I'd like to add your name and email address to the
lurker AUTHORS file for the translation. May I?
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is necessary. If you have a people.debian.org account, it can
also be done online/interactively.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pt.xml
Description: application/xml
that is necessary. If you have a people.debian.org account, it can
also be done online/interactively.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tr.xml
Description: application/xml
, it seems to have just not been in utf-8.
I have converted it from iso-8859-1 (was that correct)?
At any rate, it seems to work now.
Can you confirm that what you see is indeed Italian? ;)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:48:30 +0200
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 13:01:49 +0200
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 23:29:11 +0200
Source: cryptsetup
Binary: cryptsetup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
and it was
with him that I was coordinating the patch. We'll see how it works out.
At any rate, the package (with needed scripts) is in NEW waiting for the
ftpmasters. The pathces are all ready, and it's pretty much taken care of
now.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
to test it.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:07:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:02:15PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
It looks to me like the initrd doesn't even need to setup root, right?
The boot process will replace the entire kernel, it's modules, it's idea of
root
device (swap+root).
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
--- mkinitrd.orig 2004-06-05 22:54:52.0 +0200
+++ mkinitrd.mine 2004-06-07 12:08:25.0 +0200
@@ -321,8 +321,90 @@
fi
}
+dmcrypt() {
+ local cipher_mode devname submajor subminor
+
+ if ! command -v
partition which uses a different crypto key
on every boot.
Anyways, my patch removes the swap support, and adds support for cryptoroot.
I have attached the patch, as well as an updated example of a script which
uses a USB stick to share the keys.
cryptsetup is sitting in NEW.
--
Wesley W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 11:45:06 +0200
Source: bidentd
Binary: bidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra
are handled right. Otherwise, I would like to upload my own
package.
If I don't hear back in a week or so, I will assume that this ITP has timed
out, and upload my own package...
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
so that the root filesystem can be encrypted. Finally, I have a few
scripts which allow using a simple XOR secret sharing scheme to allow
booting via a half-key from usb stick, floppy disk, or cd.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 18:51:23 +0200
Source: lurker
Binary: lurker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:05:20 +0200
Source: bidentd
Binary: bidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:22:31 +0100
Source: mico
Binary: libmico2.3.11 libmico-dev mico-doc mico
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.3.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:22:54 +0100
Source: lurker
Binary: lurker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 11:32:27 +0100
Source: mico
Binary: libmico2.3.11 libmico-dev mico-doc mico
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.3.10-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED
this package.
I don't know anything about hostap functionality though, and I am
considering dropping this functionality. Would it be missed?
Thanks.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:27:20AM -0500, Joe Moore wrote:
Wesley W. Terpstra said:
So, what does that mean for a package where the copyright holder
distributes the package with an extra clause and GPL? Can I
redistribute it at all?
PS. Please CC me on replies as I am not subscribed
like http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/
If the intention was to simply turn off user public_html directories, the
best thing to do would be to comment out
LoadModule userdir_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_userdir.so
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:40:26 +0100
Source: lurker
Binary: lurker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:57:43 +
Source: lurker
Binary: lurker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL
no synchronization issues with using the hw:0,0 and
hw:0,1 or hw:1,0 and hw:1,1 together.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:14:19 +
Source: ucd-snmp
Binary: libsnmp4.2 libsnmp4.2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.2.5-3.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:56:49 +
Source: umsdos
Binary: umsdos
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.13-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Risko Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:19:36 +0200
Source: bidentd
Binary: bidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:16:23 +
Source: bidentd
Binary: bidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra
I have verified this bug (inadvertantly) on several of our NIS connected
client machines at my work.
Same libc6 version, same problem: cannot log in with nis accounts.
--
Wes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:51:06PM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote:
* Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
It would be nice if the user had a hostname after an install which
does not include networking.
In my opinion, the question for a hostname should be relayed to
base-config. There is no need
Package: partitioner
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-17
Severity: serious
After installing a system, the fstab is correct for all the selected
partitions and cdrom and floppy, but is missing special filesystems.
Most notably proc.
However, tmpfs, devfs, usbfs, etc, may be good to add as
Package: netcfg
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-17
Severity: normal
It would be nice if the user had a hostname after an install which does not
include networking.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux laptop9 2.5.74-mm1 #2 Fri Jul 4
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=micover=2.3.10-3arch=armstamp=1057487644file=logas=raw
Help?
--
Wes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 11:45:30 +
Source: mico
Binary: libmico-dev libmico2.3.10 mico-doc mico
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.3.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 21:36:40 +0200
Source: mico
Binary: libmico-dev libmico2.3.10 mico-doc mico
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.3.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:19:07 +0200
Source: mico
Binary: libmico-dev libmico2.3.10 mico-doc mico
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.3.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:58:35PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 17/06/2003 Richard Barrett wrote:
i still have in my mm_cfg.py:
PUBLIC_EXTERNAL_ARCHIVER = 'lurker-index -l `lurker-list -c
/etc/lurker/lurker.conf | grep -B2 ^%(listname)s$| head -n1` -m'
It seems your trouble is with
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
these examples both work for me too. so really no mailman error. if I set:
PUBLIC_EXTERNAL_ARCHIVER = '/usr/bin/lurker-index -l imc-sysadmin -m
/tmp/logs 21'
cat /tmp/logs gives:
opening database: Bad file descriptor
to lurker
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:50:37AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
Let me briefly outline why lurker has one mailbox per list:
[...]
For these reasons I consider the new scheme to be superior from a usability
and robustness
it is. ;-)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 171314 +pending
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:40:30AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:25:00PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Please close this WNPP bug when your packages are in the archive.
I
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:55:49AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Assuming that the game itself does not depend on the voice and music
packages (and it should not, as they are completely optional) this should
not prevent the core game from entering the archive, which should be about
20M as you
uploaded the pieces as seperate source packages precisely to reduce
bandwidth needs for the mirrors when only one component changes.
So, if the ftpmasters accepted uqm and uqm-data, there would be no problem.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpdPVavm2vLV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
if they are familiar with xslt.
Thanks for your time!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After running into yet two more problems with staged installs ala DESTDIR,
I was reminded of an idea I originally had for fink packages.
... but, let's begin from the beginning.
Why is DESTDIR a problem?
---
1: libtool cannot relink inter-dependent libraries during a staged install.
2: some
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:11:59PM -0500, Jason House wrote:
Once I heard there was a generic socket library in development, I thought I'd add
a quick feature request. I would like to see the ability to have multiple
streams through the same socket.
This boils down to providing two
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:40:19PM +0100, Schleicher Ralph (LLI) wrote:
I'm cross compiling Libtool modules for a MinGW host on a HP-UX box.
When running 'make install', I get a strange error message:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=install
/home/raid/cea_adm/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/bin/install
For those of us who would rather expect libtool installed on the system than
reincluding it in our source, it would be handy if ltdl had a pkg-config .pc
file.
This would make it much easier to detect libltdl in the absence of using the
hefty configure macro.
---
Wes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:01:21 +
Source: bidentd
Binary: bidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libmico-gtk2.3c102 - A fully compliant CORBA implementation - GTK event bindings
libmico-qt2.3c102 - A fully compliant CORBA implementation - QT
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libmico-gtk2.3 - A fully compliant CORBA implementation - GTK event bindings
libmico-qt2.3 - A fully compliant CORBA implementation - QT event bindings
libmico-tcl2.3
301 - 400 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
