tags 243857 + pending
thanks
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems like
in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better-flow.patch
Thanks for
Hi Joshua,
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems like
in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better-flow.patch
Thanks for the pointer.
I
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems
like in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Further testing of this fix proved that it is insufficient. hw-detect
call check-missing-firmware, which look on several devices (disk, USB
sticks, floppies) for firmware, but fail to look on the CD itself.
This, I must admit, is very sad.
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 16. März 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
An additional issue with non-free firmware is that including it in the
way you propose would (I think) mean it will get loaded without any
prompting of the user, which may in some cases violate
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Actually, something causes main-menu to crash if I adjust mountmedia
to return CD devices too, so I suspect it is better to adjust
check-missing-firmware to also look in /cdrom/firmware/ for debs.
Probably because the CD is already mounted
Reading Wouter's post in this thread just now I realize I made a fairly
stupid mistake when writing my mail.
Frans Pop wrote:
This seems to be what the RT has been focussing on after Sarge. [...]
s/Sarge/Etch/
During the Sarge release these two sides were in balance. After that, for
Sarge
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Paul Jurczak wrote:
Comments/Problems:
I'm experimenting with various distributions and I successfully
installed Ubuntu, Puppy, Fedora from USB Flash to USB Flash. Debian is
the first distro, where I had to go USB CD to USB Flash route.
Debian supports all kinds of
Please always reply to the BTS, not to the person responding.
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, you wrote:
Thank you for quick response. Do you mean that copying
hd-media/boot.img.gz and .iso image to USB Flash will result in
different installation behavior than preparing USB Flash with LiveUSB
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Further testing of this fix proved that it is insufficient. hw-detect
call check-missing-firmware, which look on several devices (disk, USB
sticks, floppies) for firmware, but fail to look on the CD itself.
This, I must admit, is very sad.
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 16. März 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
An additional issue with non-free firmware is that including it in the
way you propose would (I think) mean it will get loaded without any
prompting of the user, which may in some cases violate
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Actually, something causes main-menu to crash if I adjust mountmedia
to return CD devices too, so I suspect it is better to adjust
check-missing-firmware to also look in /cdrom/firmware/ for debs.
Probably because the CD is already mounted
reassign 573791 installation-reports
tag 573791 unreproducible needinfo
thanks
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, steve clark wrote:
I sent a report to the debian bug reporting system (bug number 573791)
but it seems to not have been taken serious, being shuffled between
responsible owners.
I see it
Please note this log is taken just now using:
debian 5.04 netinst business card image
I have just tried with the same image (for i386), using ftp.nl.d.o as
mirror without any problems. My log looks similar to you, except that I
get good signatures...
From my log:
Mar 16 17:41:08
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
3. Provide some way for firmware debs to communicate to d-i that they
have a license the user needs to see, and have check-missing-firmware
display these licenses before the firmware is ever used.
This is the option that I have had in the back
tags 243857 + pending
thanks
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems like
in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better-flow.patch
Thanks for
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Hugo Alberto Perlin wrote:
I'm trying to install Debian using the NetInst CD and a local repository
created using the apt-mirror app.
The installation with the local repository make the downloads of the
first part well. But in the second part, when it need 5 files, it
Hi Joshua,
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems like
in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better-flow.patch
Thanks for the pointer.
I
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems
like in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
My *top* priorities are:
- glibc regressions.
- vfork bug.Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I think it's time for another huge thank you to Carlos for his continued
work that allows hppa to remain alive.
So Carlos: muchas gracias
(Not meaning to dismiss all the excellent work of
On Monday 15 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
That source package does not contain all available firmware, FWIW.
You're missing at least zd1211-firmware and
atmel-firmware. debian-cd has a list in tasks/firmware.
Btw, tasks/firmware refer to the non-existing package
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
This is not very good, since .32 is skipped by -rt people, so us who need
realtime kernel, won't be able just to add a patch to distribution
kernel, but instead will have to use different
Package: apt
Version:0.7.25.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch, l10n
Attached an update for the Dutch translation of apt.
Please include in your next upload.
TIA
apt_0.7.25.3_nl.po.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: console-setup
Severity: minor
Currently when selecting a layout for a country the Other choice is
sorted alphabetically. This means that for Dutch it's the last option
listed while for USA it's the first.
It would be better to nave this not sorted and instead always have it
listed as
On Monday 15 March 2010, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Hm, the threadall backtraces look identical. Is there another page?
Ugh, must have made a mistake. Will get a new trace.
BTW, if you're talking about the mouse having problems because of the
terminal state: usually holding down Shift
On Monday 15 March 2010, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Hm, the threadall backtraces look identical. Is there another page?
Shift did work...
I've cleaned out the remnants of the frontend.
Thread 12 (Thread 0xf3dddb70 (LWP 1516)):
#0 0xf7837acc in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
On Monday 15 March 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Thanks, Frans. Resyncing the file with the current POT file in teh
debian-sid branch in bzr gives one untranslated string. Would you
mind completing it?
Attached.
nl.po.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Marc Haber wrote:
In the last years I have seen a really disturbing development in
Debian: New developers are very interested in bringing new packages
into Debian, but care for our core infrastructure (dpkg, apt) has a
little bit diminished.
Good question and quite true.
IMO it's worth
Margarita Manterola wrote:
I think that most of the frustration comes from the fact that the
release team is lacking manpower. The job of the release team is very
stressful and very rarely do the RM and RA feel that their work is
appreciated.
I disagree. I think the main problem is that
On Monday 15 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 15 March 2010, kin boster wrote:
Template: my_test/title
Should be: debian-installer/my_title/title
Or rather: debian-installer/my_test-udeb/title
(Or, in general: debian-installer/name of udeb/title)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Monday 15 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
That source package does not contain all available firmware, FWIW.
You're missing at least zd1211-firmware and
atmel-firmware. debian-cd has a list in tasks/firmware.
Btw, tasks/firmware refer to the non-existing package
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:16:40PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
It'd be quite weird to have a keyboard layout configured in d-i, and
ignored when switching VTs to get to a console, IMO...
Unfortunately this is inevitable. 'loadkeys' and
Sorry for not replying sooner. If there had been anything really urgent I
would have commented, but there wasn't.
I did look at the new image and udebs earlier, but did not get around to
doing a full review until now.
The difference in image size between version 1 and 2 is about 400kB
On Monday 15 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
In the end I used libnettle, statically linked (that's amd64 this
time, but you'll see the huge overhead of linking statically):
| Installed-Size: [-2204-] {+2208+}
libmatrixssl's headers were a mess, nettle is much cleaner, and
directly
Package: console-setup
Severity: minor
Currently when selecting a layout for a country the Other choice is
sorted alphabetically. This means that for Dutch it's the last option
listed while for USA it's the first.
It would be better to nave this not sorted and instead always have it
listed as
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Besides that it offers choices for keymaps that are not even available
This does happen. At least, with only console-setup-pc-ekmap loaded I see
Sun dead keys listed for Dutch (hmmm
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Miroslav Kure wrote:
No clue on tty4 at this stage. However, when I go back to the main
That's normal. stderr often stays buffered until you exit a component
(return to the main menu).
menu and select to partition disks again, nothing happens (I am
So that's not
tags 573818 pending
thanks
On Sunday 14 March 2010, A. Costa wrote:
Found some typos in '/usr/share/man/man1/debtree.1.gz', see attached
'.diff'.
Thanks a lot. Committed for the next release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
tag 573878 pending
thanks
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Here is some fixes for netcfg on hurd-i386.
Committed. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Please also add hurd-i386 to the netcfg binary package architecture
list.
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Miroslav Kure wrote:
No clue on tty4 at this stage. However, when I go back to the main
That's normal. stderr often stays buffered until you exit a component
(return to the main menu).
menu and select to partition disks again, nothing happens (I am
So that's not
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Clint Adams wrote:
Okay, so when there is a mysterious release team meeting in Cambridge,
and there is no discussion or planning of it on debian-release [...]
Clint,
Although to some level I agree with you [1], I wonder if you could explain
one thing.
That meeting
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2010-03-14 16:09:34 CET]:
[1] I think release management for (old)stable is being handled quite
well ATM.
While this might be true and valid for stable, I am not too convinced
that the last point release
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 08:15:53AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
D-I does not follow Recommends during base-installer (as discussed
last month). This means that currently console-setup gets installed
without kbd and console-tools.
This is wrong
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Anton Zinoviev, le Sun 14 Mar 2010 12:39:08 +0200, a écrit :
In the past c-s used strong dependency but I changed it to only
recommends because of request by porters working on architectures
which do not have kbd or console-tools (i.e. BSD).
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
I am realy surprised by all of this. What was causing kbd or
console-tools to be installed in the past (before console-setup)?
We used to explicitly install 'console-tools console-data console-common'.
Probably exactly because Recommends were not
tag 573878 pending
thanks
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Here is some fixes for netcfg on hurd-i386.
Committed. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Please also add hurd-i386 to the netcfg binary package architecture
list.
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Miroslav Kure wrote:
No clue on tty4 at this stage. However, when I go back to the main
That's normal. stderr often stays buffered until you exit a component
(return to the main menu).
menu and select to partition disks again, nothing happens (I am
So that's not
On Monday 15 March 2010, kin boster wrote:
Template: my_test/title
Should be: debian-installer/my_title/title
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
partman-target - Provides partman with ability to prepare /target (udeb)
Closes: 573252
Changes:
partman-target (66) unstable; urgency=low
.
* No longer create /cdrom compatibility symlink. Closes: #573252.
With thanks to Maximilian Attems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:29:49 +0100
Source: pkgsel
Binary: pkgsel
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f
Hi Martin,
On Saturday 13 February 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2010.02.12.1238 +1300]:
but I think we should make 0.9 the default for squeeze and move
to 1.1 only afterwards, once grub-pc knows how to deal with it.
Do you want to do
Hi Anton,
D-I does not follow Recommends during base-installer (as discussed last
month). This means that currently console-setup gets installed without kbd
and console-tools.
Would it be better in your opinion to force installation of Recommends for
console-setup? What exactly is the
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
apt-cdrom-setup - set up a CD in sources.list (udeb)
apt-mirror-setup - set up a mirror in sources.list (udeb)
apt-setup-udeb - Configure apt (udeb)
Changes:
apt-setup (1:0.45) unstable; urgency=low
.
* There's no need
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
base-installer - base system installation framework (udeb)
bootstrap-base - Install the base system (udeb)
Changes:
base-installer (1.106) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Define the mount point for apt-cdrom in target as /media/cdrom
On Friday 12 March 2010, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 01:54:31PM +0100, Frans Pop f...@debian.org was
heard to say:
aptitude runs fine on my sparc64 box for upgrading and installing
packages, but segfaults always when I quit the application.
Does this happen just
On Friday 12 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
It's a box I don't boot that often but I've never seen the segfaults
before, certainly not with 0.4.11. I noticed it after the last upgrade.
Just got another segfault; this time after the second go for the purge of
a single package (with the download
One more clue.
After the segfault I get a shell prompt. But the screen is not cleared and
the mouse is in a weird state.
Seems as if the mouse is still half captured. Any button action results in
output at the prompt; 'reset' clears it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I don't think it particularly matters if there's a stray /media/cdrom.
I could always plug in a usb cd drive.
OK. Let's give it a try as it is now then. I will uploaded base-installer
and apt-setup to start with.
Colin,
At the risk of invoking your
On Friday 12 March 2010, Richard Lamboj wrote:
i need to create an init ramdisk for booting over the network. I'am
working on an Project to manage Servers, Vservers, Clients and Services
over the Network and one part is an init ramdisk wich will install disk
images on the clients to place
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I don't think it particularly matters if there's a stray /media/cdrom.
I could always plug in a usb cd drive.
OK. Let's give it a try as it is now then. I will uploaded base-installer
and apt-setup to start with.
Colin,
At the risk of invoking your
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
applications that still rely on a toplevel /cdrom
are likely very buggy and should be kicked.
nuke etch compatibility link.
Except that D-I itself still uses it :-/
We'll need to change that first...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 573252 pending
thanks
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
applications that still rely on a toplevel /cdrom
are likely very buggy and should be kicked.
nuke etch compatibility link.
Except that D-I itself still uses
On Thursday 11 March 2010, you wrote:
/cdrom was only obsoleted in etch by a combination of prayer and wishful
thinking. apt-cdrom still relied on it until very recently, when
Michael Vogt did some work on it.
Hmm. It could be that back then only the automatic unmounting was fixed.
I'll
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Colin Watson wrote:
If you don't bind-mount /target/cdrom in base-installer, how do you
ensure that we use the same CD for base installation as was used to boot
the installer?
You cannot ensure that even if you do bind mount it as the BIOS' idea of
what is the first
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
No, we no longer bind mount /target/cdrom. We used to bind mount it
permanently, but that was changed with the reintroduction of multi-cd
support. Instead we always leave it up to apt-cdrom to mount/umount the
CD as (and only as long as) needed.
Oh
On Thursday 11 March 2010, you wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
No, we no longer bind mount /target/cdrom. We used to bind mount it
permanently, but that was changed with the reintroduction of multi-cd
support. Instead we always leave it up to apt-cdrom to mount/umount
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2010, you wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
No, we no longer bind mount /target/cdrom. We used to bind mount it
permanently, but that was changed with the reintroduction of
multi-cd support. Instead we
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom drive,
and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have not worked
out which component is responsible.
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-files.preinst has:
if [ -d /cdrom ]; then
On Friday 12 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom
drive, and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have
not worked out which component is responsible.
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom drive,
and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have not worked
out which component is responsible.
Duh. I looked at the code earlier today. It's base-installer of course
On Friday 12 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom
drive, and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have
not worked out which component is responsible.
So after today's changes
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
applications that still rely on a toplevel /cdrom
are likely very buggy and should be kicked.
nuke etch compatibility link.
Except that D-I itself still uses it :-/
We'll need to change that first...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tag 573252 pending
thanks
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
applications that still rely on a toplevel /cdrom
are likely very buggy and should be kicked.
nuke etch compatibility link.
Except that D-I itself still uses
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
To try and make sure I wasn't missing any occurrences, I've patched
lintian and sent the preliminary patch as a bugreport against lintian:
#573399. Feel free to voice in, improve the patch, etc. :)
The background to this is that until Lenny
On Thursday 11 March 2010, you wrote:
/cdrom was only obsoleted in etch by a combination of prayer and wishful
thinking. apt-cdrom still relied on it until very recently, when
Michael Vogt did some work on it.
Hmm. It could be that back then only the automatic unmounting was fixed.
I'll
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Colin Watson wrote:
If you don't bind-mount /target/cdrom in base-installer, how do you
ensure that we use the same CD for base installation as was used to boot
the installer?
You cannot ensure that even if you do bind mount it as the BIOS' idea of
what is the first
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
No, we no longer bind mount /target/cdrom. We used to bind mount it
permanently, but that was changed with the reintroduction of multi-cd
support. Instead we always leave it up to apt-cdrom to mount/umount the
CD as (and only as long as) needed.
Oh
On Thursday 11 March 2010, you wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
No, we no longer bind mount /target/cdrom. We used to bind mount it
permanently, but that was changed with the reintroduction of multi-cd
support. Instead we always leave it up to apt-cdrom to mount/umount
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2010, you wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
No, we no longer bind mount /target/cdrom. We used to bind mount it
permanently, but that was changed with the reintroduction of
multi-cd support. Instead we
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom drive,
and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have not worked
out which component is responsible.
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-files.preinst has:
if [ -d /cdrom ]; then
On Friday 12 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom
drive, and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have
not worked out which component is responsible.
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom drive,
and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have not worked
out which component is responsible.
Duh. I looked at the code earlier today. It's base-installer of course
On Friday 12 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
I installed the alpha from usb stick, onto a system with no cdrom
drive, and a /cdrom directory (not symlink) was left behind. I have
not worked out which component is responsible.
So after today's changes
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, Pietro Abate wrote:
setting APT_CONFIG is the way to go. No need to modify debtree...
APT_CONFIG=apt.conf apt-get update
APT_CONFIG=apt.conf debtree dpkg
Thanks for your info. I think we should keep the BR open until this has
been documented, for example in a
Package: hercules
Version: 3.06-1.3
Severity: wishlist
The herculeans have released 3.07. It would be great to have that in
Squeeze.
I would suggest updating some of the documentation.
The giving_s_390_a_try.html is outdated; I'd drop it and instead add the
following to the README.Debian.
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, jassi brar wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
When building with an SMDK6410 config with CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m I get
the following compilation error:
CC [M] drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.o
drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c:31:22
On Thursday 11 March 2010, jassi brar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, jassi brar wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
When building with an SMDK6410 config with CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m
On Thursday 11 March 2010, jassi brar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2010, jassi brar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, jassi brar wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10
On Thursday 11 March 2010, jassi brar wrote:
Then you need patches from Grant Likely's tree.
The driver now includes a new header plat/s3c64xxx-spi.h instead
Check http://git.secretlab.ca/?p=linux-2.6.git;a=summary
branch 'next' or 'next-spi'
Yep, that does work! Thanks a lot for your
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
The firmware bundle at
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/firmware/testing/c
urrent/ contains firmware files from lenny.
I'm fairly sure that testing did not have such old versions of when
the file was built in February, so is it
debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
partman-crypto - Add to partman support for block device encryption (udeb)
partman-crypto-dm - Add to partman support for dm-crypt encryption (udeb)
partman-crypto-loop - Add to partman support for loop-AES
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Also: Is there any way to make sure there's no (kernel) version
mismatch between *-modules packages in the future?
That still stands.
Problem is that if we ask to remove the loop-aes udebs for .30 for unstable
(which is the only real option
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Using my d-i usb stick, I was hoping to recover from it by mounting
the crypted lvm through cryptsetup luksOpen … (which a quick google
suggests), but unfortunately I end up with cryptsetup telling me to
check for missing aes support in the
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Using my d-i usb stick, I was hoping to recover from it by mounting
the crypted lvm through cryptsetup luksOpen … (which a quick google
suggests), but unfortunately I end up with cryptsetup telling
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Colin Watson wrote:
Indeed, what he said. grub-probe is in grub-common exactly so that both
grub-legacy and grub2 can use it, and note that there's a bit of code in
my patch to handle the different partition number offset.
As long as there won't be regressions for
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Using my d-i usb stick, I was hoping to recover from it by mounting
the crypted lvm through cryptsetup luksOpen … (which a quick google
suggests), but unfortunately I end up with cryptsetup telling me to
check for missing aes support in the
On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
The outcome was quite surprising, but explained a lot: cryptsetup
wasn't actually installed on the target system…
Did you install the system using a daily image? If so, that's what you get
from using udebs from unstable ;-)
Fixed.
--
To
Hi Guido,
What's the status of multipath support in Squeeze? Especially given the
switch to grub2.
Could you perhaps update the wiki page [1]? It currently refers to loads of
closed bug reports, which only makes one wonder.
If possible, please clarify the status both for Lenny and for Squeeze.
401 - 500 of 18898 matches
Mail list logo
