[valgrind] [Bug 379893] valgrind segfault os x 10.12.4 (_pthread_body)

2018-11-03 Thread Gonzalo BG
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379893 --- Comment #9 from Gonzalo BG --- Trying to run jemalloc's tests under valgrind on OSX I think I'm running into this issue: The output is: running 1 test test background_threads_runtime_defaults ... ==35051== Thread 2: ==35051== Invalid read of size

[valgrind] [Bug 396367] unhandled syscall amd64-darwin unix:520 (terminate_with_payload) and unix:521 (abort_with_payload)

2018-08-20 Thread Gonzalo BG
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396367 --- Comment #6 from Gonzalo BG --- Thank you for looking into it! I'll follow the other bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 396367] unhandled syscall amd64-darwin unix:520 (terminate_with_payload) and unix:521 (abort_with_payload)

2018-08-20 Thread Gonzalo BG
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396367 --- Comment #4 from Gonzalo BG --- > Where did you see unix:520 and unix:521 missing on macOS with jemalloc? Going through the logs and travis-CI runs I can't find them anywhere. Maybe I saw this locally, no idea. I just re-started CI with the mas

[valgrind] [Bug 396367] unhandled syscall amd64-darwin unix:520 and unix:521

2018-07-10 Thread Gonzalo BG
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396367 --- Comment #1 from Gonzalo BG --- The syscalls 520 and 521 might be these ones (https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu/blob/master/bsd/kern/syscalls.master#L824): AUE_KILL and AUE_EXIT . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[valgrind] [Bug 396367] New: unhandled syscall amd64-darwin unix:520 and unix:521

2018-07-10 Thread Gonzalo BG
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396367 Bug ID: 396367 Summary: unhandled syscall amd64-darwin unix:520 and unix:521 Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED

[PATCH] D26953: clang-format: handle formatting on constexpr if

2017-04-03 Thread Gonzalo BG via Phabricator via cfe-commits
gnzlbg added a comment. any progress on this? https://reviews.llvm.org/D26953 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D31308: [clang-tidy] new check readability-no-alternative-tokens

2017-03-24 Thread Gonzalo BG via Phabricator via cfe-commits
gnzlbg added a comment. Thanks for working on this! > I'm not sure if it would be helpful to have this check in both ways. I did a > code search for "not_eq", "bitand" and "and_eq" on github, and their usage > seems to be a clear minority. I actually was requesting the opposite version of

[PATCH] D23765: Fix for clang PR 29087

2016-11-17 Thread Gonzalo BG via cfe-commits
gnzlbg added a comment. ping https://reviews.llvm.org/D23765 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Re: [PATCH] D18139: [Cxx1z] Implement Lambda Capture of *this by Value as [=, *this] (P0018R3)

2016-04-25 Thread Gonzalo BG via cfe-commits
Dear Richard Smith and Faisal Vali, this patch broke my code. I've filled a bug report here: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27507 I tried to reduce the testcase with delta but over the weekend it only managed to reduce it from 500k LOC to 300k LOC, sorry for that. If there is anything I

[CMake] Lower the barrier of entry to the wiki

2015-02-20 Thread Gonzalo BG
it is going to be a miracle if I actually get to contribute those recipes. I think that there is just no excuse for this. Bests, Gonzalo BG -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services

Re: [PATCH] [clang-format] AllowSimpleBracedStatements

2014-05-14 Thread Gonzalo BG
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Gonzalo BG gonzalob...@gmail.com wrote: This patch adds a new option AllowSimpleBracedStatements that allows braced statements to be considered as simple. That is, if AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine and AllowShortLoopStatementsOnASingle line are enabled, code

Re: [PATCH] [clang-format] AllowSimpleBracedStatements

2014-05-14 Thread Gonzalo BG
an explanation for git. On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Jasper djas...@google.com wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Gonzalo BG gonzalob...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like you might have attached the wrong diff. It contains nothing but formatting changes as far as I can tell. Indeed

[PATCH] [clang-format] AllowSimpleBracedStatements

2014-05-12 Thread Gonzalo BG
clang-format to do what I wanted. Bests, Gonzalo BG --- unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp (before formatting) +++ unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp (after formatting) @@ -8880,7 +8880,6 @@ int i;\n)); } - // Tests AllowSimpleBracedStatements TEST_F(FormatTest

Re: [PATCH] Add -finstruments-functions-exclude-{file, function}-list options

2013-11-19 Thread Gonzalo BG
gnzlbg added you to the CC list for the revision Add -finstruments-functions-exclude-{file, function}-list options. This options allow to exclude functions from instrumentation either by providing a list of user-visible function names or a list of file paths. These allows to exclude e.g. the