-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
control: severity -1 important
control: tag - unreproducible moreinfo
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 18:28 +0200, Philippe Caillaud wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I use mousepad almost each day for small text editing ; since a few days
> (maybe
> 2 or 3),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
control: severity -1 important
control: tag - unreproducible moreinfo
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 18:28 +0200, Philippe Caillaud wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I use mousepad almost each day for small text editing ; since a few days
> (maybe
> 2 or 3),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
control: severity -1 important
control: tag - unreproducible moreinfo
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 18:28 +0200, Philippe Caillaud wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I use mousepad almost each day for small text editing ; since a few days
> (maybe
> 2 or 3),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 01:28 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> My plan for base-files is to stop overriding the PATH in /etc/profile.
Note that /etc/profile is a configuration file for bourne shells. While it's a
common path, it's not especially for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 01:28 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> My plan for base-files is to stop overriding the PATH in /etc/profile.
Note that /etc/profile is a configuration file for bourne shells. While it's a
common path, it's not especially for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 01:28 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> My plan for base-files is to stop overriding the PATH in /etc/profile.
Note that /etc/profile is a configuration file for bourne shells. While it's a
common path, it's not especially for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 19:01 +0200, William Bonnet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a long time Xfce user and experienced with packaging even if i am
> not (yet) a DM. I would be very happy to join the xfce effort and help
> with the various activities
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 00:01 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
> Thanks, upstream has now accepted a patch that takes a slightly different
> approach to fixing the issue.
>
> https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/352
Yes I saw. That's why I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 00:01 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
> Thanks, upstream has now accepted a patch that takes a slightly different
> approach to fixing the issue.
>
> https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/352
Yes I saw. That's why I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 00:01 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
> Thanks, upstream has now accepted a patch that takes a slightly different
> approach to fixing the issue.
>
> https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/352
Yes I saw. That's why I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 16:11 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for the patch. It looks a bit strong though, undefining stuff
> > like
> > that unconditionally. Do you have pointers to the Ubuntu bug or something?
> > I've looked at upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 16:11 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for the patch. It looks a bit strong though, undefining stuff
> > like
> > that unconditionally. Do you have pointers to the Ubuntu bug or something?
> > I've looked at upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 16:11 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for the patch. It looks a bit strong though, undefining stuff
> > like
> > that unconditionally. Do you have pointers to the Ubuntu bug or something?
> > I've looked at upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 10:39 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
> isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
> package to the list to use that. However, it fails.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 11:25 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for the patch. It looks a bit strong though, undefining stuff
> > like
> > that unconditionally. Do you have pointers to the Ubuntu bug or something?
> I haven't checked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 11:25 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for the patch. It looks a bit strong though, undefining stuff
> > like
> > that unconditionally. Do you have pointers to the Ubuntu bug or something?
> I haven't checked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 11:25 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for the patch. It looks a bit strong though, undefining stuff
> > like
> > that unconditionally. Do you have pointers to the Ubuntu bug or something?
> I haven't checked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 00:37 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> I assume the following patch from Ubuntu fixes this:
>
> --- a/tests/src/libsystem.c
> +++ b/tests/src/libsystem.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #define __USE_GNU
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 00:37 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> I assume the following patch from Ubuntu fixes this:
>
> --- a/tests/src/libsystem.c
> +++ b/tests/src/libsystem.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #define __USE_GNU
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 00:37 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> I assume the following patch from Ubuntu fixes this:
>
> --- a/tests/src/libsystem.c
> +++ b/tests/src/libsystem.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #define __USE_GNU
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 12:25 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:ifuse
> Version: 1.1.4~git20181007.3b00243-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid trixie ftbfs patch
>
> ifuse ftbfs from source, not finding the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 12:25 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:ifuse
> Version: 1.1.4~git20181007.3b00243-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid trixie ftbfs patch
>
> ifuse ftbfs from source, not finding the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 20:39:25 -0300 Leandro Cunha
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been talking to one of them these days and he's been busy lately.
> But he said next month he should work on it. I should see if I can
> help with something too.
>
Hi Leandro,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 17:25 +, Faulk Johnny wrote:
> Has anyone taken a look at this fix by Phil Wyett? It seems straightforward
> enough, I just question what stops it from being merged...
Hi Johnny,
xfce4-panel-profiles is under the Xfce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: reassign -1 ibus
On Sun, 2024-02-11 at 14:42 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Yes indeed, that's really weird. I'll try a live 12.5 cd at some point but
> > if
> > you have one handy can you run a dpkg -l |grep '^ibus' or something?
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: reassign -1 ibus
On Sun, 2024-02-11 at 14:42 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Yes indeed, that's really weird. I'll try a live 12.5 cd at some point but
> > if
> > you have one handy can you run a dpkg -l |grep '^ibus' or something?
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2024-02-10 at 17:22 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Actual result
> =
>
> I got this notification popping up (screenshot attached, transcribed here):
>
> IBus Notification
> -
> Keymap changes do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2024-02-10 at 17:22 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Actual result
> =
>
> I got this notification popping up (screenshot attached, transcribed here):
>
> IBus Notification
> -
> Keymap changes do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:38 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Is this line of reasoning convincing to you?
Yes indeed, thanks for the explanation then. I'll import the diff to our
repository.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:38 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Is this line of reasoning convincing to you?
Yes indeed, thanks for the explanation then. I'll import the diff to our
repository.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 10:34 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> libxfce4ui fails to cross build from source, because it fails running
> the gtk-doc scanner with an Exec format error. This is fairly usual.
> Fortunately, it also splits out its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 10:34 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> libxfce4ui fails to cross build from source, because it fails running
> the gtk-doc scanner with an Exec format error. This is fairly usual.
> Fortunately, it also splits out its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 00:28 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, to clarify, the patch I sent was against 4.18 in unstable; but it
> applied cleanly to 4.19 in experimental (no new sonames in experimental vs
> unstable), so it's been uploaded there.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 00:28 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, to clarify, the patch I sent was against 4.18 in unstable; but it
> applied cleanly to 4.19 in experimental (no new sonames in experimental vs
> unstable), so it's been uploaded there.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 00:28 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, to clarify, the patch I sent was against 4.18 in unstable; but it
> applied cleanly to 4.19 in experimental (no new sonames in experimental vs
> unstable), so it's been uploaded there.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 11:14 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
> this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> period of several days before we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 11:14 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
> this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> period of several days before we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 11:14 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
> this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> period of several days before we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: severity -1 serious
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 08:35:40 +0100 cuboid_06_wavers
wrote:
> Package: speedtest-cli
> Version: 2.1.3-2
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: doczipe...@debian.home
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> * What led up to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 11:31:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: xfce4-power-manager
> Version: 4.18.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Control: close -1 4.18.3-1
> Tags: sid trixie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 11:31:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: xfce4-power-manager
> Version: 4.18.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Control: close -1 4.18.3-1
> Tags: sid trixie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 11:31:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: xfce4-power-manager
> Version: 4.18.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Control: close -1 4.18.3-1
> Tags: sid trixie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 09:06 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> What I would love is some review of my perl-fu, just visually, without
> running anything. I made some comments on the MR that expand on that;
> I'm particularly wondering about the map {
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 17:18 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 16:01:59, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > subject mostly says it all, but it'd be nice if KGB could support
> > password-protected IRC channels fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 09:22 +, anantha...@siemens.com wrote:
> CC to maintainers,
>
> Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org,
>
> Aurélien COUDERC
> couc...@debian.org,
> Jonathan Carter
> j...@debian.org
>
Hi Ananth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 17:06 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The attached script can be used to generate a dd-list from the URL to
> the transition tracker.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
Hi Bas, I have to admit I was surprised to see a reply to my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 17:06 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The attached script can be used to generate a dd-list from the URL to
> the transition tracker.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
Hi Bas, I have to admit I was surprised to see a reply to my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5560-1 secur...@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/Yves-Alexis Perez
November 20, 2023
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2023-11-19 at 10:07 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I just tested this once more: It needs to be
>
> /run/user/*/ICEauthority-l l,
>
> Without that line, guest login to a MATE desktop is slloo
> (with error dialog about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2023-11-19 at 10:07 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I just tested this once more: It needs to be
>
> /run/user/*/ICEauthority-l l,
>
> Without that line, guest login to a MATE desktop is slloo
> (with error dialog about
Yves-Alexis Perez pushed to branch master at Debian Security Tracker /
security-tracker
Commits:
aaf72b70 by Yves-Alexis Perez at 2023-11-20T21:30:49+01:00
allocate dsa for strongSwan
- - - - -
1 changed file:
- data/DSA/list
Changes:
=
data/DSA/list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 10:25 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> + /run/user/*/ICEauthority-l l,
Hi Mike,
are you sure about the `ICEauthority-l' filename (especially the -l part)? On
my system it's just ICEauthority apparently.
Regards,
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 10:25 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> + /run/user/*/ICEauthority-l l,
Hi Mike,
are you sure about the `ICEauthority-l' filename (especially the -l part)? On
my system it's just ICEauthority apparently.
Regards,
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 18:51 -0700, Brian Tarricone wrote:
> 1) We can put the new m4 macros in a .m4 file, prefix them with something
> else so they don't conflict, and copy it into each project that uses them
> and wants to do stable releases for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 21:08 +, Gaël Bonithon wrote:
> > We have the same issue for xfce4-notifyd but then I assumed 0.9 was the
> > development branch leading to a 0.10 release for Xfce 4.20. So we pushed
> > it to
> > experimental without too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 15:39 +, Gaël Bonithon wrote:
> Hi Yves-Alexis,
>
Hi Gael,
> It's definitely not something I was expecting, but I have to admit I'm a
> little embarrassed to revert this commit. As said on IRC, I saw that Brian
> had also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 13:08 +0200, Gaël Bonithon wrote:
> - build: Simplify and clarify X11/Wayland distinction
Hi Gael,
just so you know: it seems with that change to xfce4-terminal, it's no longer
buildable with stable xfce4-dev-tools, and it
tip. I'm not the one experiencing the bug, I'm handling
this as LightDM maintainer. So I'm adding back the bug and the two
people who were experiencing it so they can test (especially Adilson).
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
tip. I'm not the one experiencing the bug, I'm handling
this as LightDM maintainer. So I'm adding back the bug and the two
people who were experiencing it so they can test (especially Adilson).
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2023-10-02 at 16:09 -0300, Adilson dos Santos Dantas wrote:
> Ok. Running the command "loginctl show-seat seat0" with lightdm 1.26.0-8 and
> this option above:
> Id=seat0
> CanTTY=yes
> CanGraphical=no
> Sessions=
> IdleHint=yes
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2023-10-02 at 16:09 -0300, Adilson dos Santos Dantas wrote:
> Ok. Running the command "loginctl show-seat seat0" with lightdm 1.26.0-8 and
> this option above:
> Id=seat0
> CanTTY=yes
> CanGraphical=no
> Sessions=
> IdleHint=yes
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi systemd/logind maintainers.
I'm reaching out to you about a bug (#1038611) reported in LightDM which is
likely somewhere else in the stack (maybe in logind or maybe in Xorg or the
DDX).
With the update to 1.32 some people experienced an issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi systemd/logind maintainers.
I'm reaching out to you about a bug (#1038611) reported in LightDM which is
likely somewhere else in the stack (maybe in logind or maybe in Xorg or the
DDX).
With the update to 1.32 some people experienced an issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi systemd/logind maintainers.
I'm reaching out to you about a bug (#1038611) reported in LightDM which is
likely somewhere else in the stack (maybe in logind or maybe in Xorg or the
DDX).
With the update to 1.32 some people experienced an issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2023-10-02 at 15:33 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> At that point I don't think it's a problem in LightDM and I don't really
> think it's a good idea to generalize the workaround (and divert from
> upstream).
Just to be sure, can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2023-10-02 at 15:33 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> At that point I don't think it's a problem in LightDM and I don't really
> think it's a good idea to generalize the workaround (and divert from
> upstream).
Just to be sure, can
idea to generalize the workaround (and divert from
upstream).
I'll ping the logind/systemd people with a summary, in case they have an idea
here.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
idea to generalize the workaround (and divert from
upstream).
I'll ping the logind/systemd people with a summary, in case they have an idea
here.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 08:58:32PM -0300, Adilson dos Santos Dantas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Here are the logs with and without the "logind-check-graphical=false"
> option.
>
> With this opinion, a new seat is added and no seat is added when this
> option is commented.
Thanks for the log. I'm unsure
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 08:58:32PM -0300, Adilson dos Santos Dantas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Here are the logs with and without the "logind-check-graphical=false"
> option.
>
> With this opinion, a new seat is added and no seat is added when this
> option is commented.
Thanks for the log. I'm unsure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 01:25 -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> I'm running into a very similar issue as the original submitter,
> however, when I'm running into it, I am *not* using the nVidia binary
> driver, but I am using a custom 5.15.44 kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 01:25 -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> I'm running into a very similar issue as the original submitter,
> however, when I'm running into it, I am *not* using the nVidia binary
> driver, but I am using a custom 5.15.44 kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-09-26 at 12:54 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> We want to change the value of systemdsystemunitdir in systemd.pc to
> point below /usr. strongswan's upstream build system consumes this
> variable while the packaging hard codes its current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 10:53 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> Hope that it answers all your questions!
Hi Arnaud, thanks for the very detailed information, that's much helpful. And
it does make sense to use alternate dependencies indeed.
But here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 10:53 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> Hope that it answers all your questions!
Hi Arnaud, thanks for the very detailed information, that's much helpful. And
it does make sense to use alternate dependencies indeed.
But here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 20:09 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> Changing the Recommends field of xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin to
> 'pulseaudio|pipewire-pulse' would solve those two issues, and more
> generally it would make life easier for people who want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 20:09 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> Changing the Recommends field of xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin to
> 'pulseaudio|pipewire-pulse' would solve those two issues, and more
> generally it would make life easier for people who want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 11:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> xdg-desktop-portal 1.17.x introduces a new way to select which portals will
> be used for which desktop environments, modelled on mimeapps.list:
Hi Simon,
thanks for the report but I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 11:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> xdg-desktop-portal 1.17.x introduces a new way to select which portals will
> be used for which desktop environments, modelled on mimeapps.list:
Hi Simon,
thanks for the report but I have
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 05:00:36PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-07-2023 15:27, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > so what you're saying is that you're a KDE user (not Xfce)
>
> Indeed.
>
> > but you're
> > still using LightDM (not KDM), and l
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 05:00:36PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-07-2023 15:27, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > so what you're saying is that you're a KDE user (not Xfce)
>
> Indeed.
>
> > but you're
> > still using LightDM (not KDM), and l
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:37:50PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 14:57:23 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > If libopenraw Debian package isn't maintained in practice, maybe it
> > makes sense to drop it completely. For tumbler we can just remove the
e it on your box it's quite ok to remove it.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
e it on your box it's quite ok to remove it.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:02:15AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Source: libopenraw
> Version: 0.1.2-0.2
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: tumb...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + tumbler-plugins-extra
>
> While investigating whether libopenraw's dependency on GTK 2 can be
>
in to display using
two rows, then added 16 workspaces (to get a 8x2 layout like you) but it
seems to display just fine.
Could you take a screenshot or something to help us investigate?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
in to display using
two rows, then added 16 workspaces (to get a 8x2 layout like you) but it
seems to display just fine.
Could you take a screenshot or something to help us investigate?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
o make the week start on Monday, independent of
> any currently used locale.
Since it's an upstream bug, could you please open directly a wishlist
issue on their tracker? It's much more likely to be acted on that way.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
o make the week start on Monday, independent of
> any currently used locale.
Since it's an upstream bug, could you please open directly a wishlist
issue on their tracker? It's much more likely to be acted on that way.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
control: reassign -1 arctica-greeter
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 20:49 +0200, Dieter Scheinkönig wrote:
> find attached my .xsession-errors.
>
> My issue, regarding the login screen (See login-shot.png). I have to
> change/select _always_ from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
control: reassign -1 arctica-greeter
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 20:49 +0200, Dieter Scheinkönig wrote:
> find attached my .xsession-errors.
>
> My issue, regarding the login screen (See login-shot.png). I have to
> change/select _always_ from
case it would be a bug, you would transfer to the artic maintainer?
I don't think so, again it doesn't look like a but in the greeter.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
case it would be a bug, you would transfer to the artic maintainer?
I don't think so, again it doesn't look like a but in the greeter.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
f the
desktop environment you use has it (for example Xfce).
In any case, could you provide your .xsession-errors as well as your
.xsession or .Xsession just in case?
It looks to me like an configuration issue rather than a bug though.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
f the
desktop environment you use has it (for example Xfce).
In any case, could you provide your .xsession-errors as well as your
.xsession or .Xsession just in case?
It looks to me like an configuration issue rather than a bug though.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
uff depending on your local configuration
(check in ~/.xsession and ~/.Xsession).
Could you provide logs from /var/log/lightdm and ~/.xsession-errors ?
In any case, it's likely not a but in the greeter (whose role is
minimal), but let's wait for more info before reassigning.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
uff depending on your local configuration
(check in ~/.xsession and ~/.Xsession).
Could you provide logs from /var/log/lightdm and ~/.xsession-errors ?
In any case, it's likely not a but in the greeter (whose role is
minimal), but let's wait for more info before reassigning.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
in the next stable...
Hey Olivier, it seems this one went under my radar for a *long time*.
Did it get solved in the end? I never experienced this one myself.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
in the next stable...
Hey Olivier, it seems this one went under my radar for a *long time*.
Did it get solved in the end? I never experienced this one myself.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:39:56AM +0200, Christophe Lohr wrote:
> Le 03/07/2023 à 21:54, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 09:06 +0200, Christophe Lohr wrote:
> How to know more about it?
Honestly at that point I'm not sure.
> I have outputs by strace and l
1 - 100 of 15426 matches
Mail list logo
