To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 20 20:26:16
+ 2010 ---
One additional response to the comments about the Repair function being the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 18 19:36:44
+ 2010 ---
hey guys, do you wanna some inspiration for new user friendly and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 14:08:30
+ 2010 ---
@bluedrache
Excuse me? I wasn't the one who suggested using thugs with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 16:41:46
+ 2010 ---
@bluedrache
Well, if your comment was directed at the person who
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 17:09:56
+ 2010 ---
@ed2
What exactly do you think happens when government enforces a law?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 20:41:22
+ 2010 ---
@ed2
You're not serious?
What do you think happens if someone disobeys a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 21:27:37
+ 2010 ---
@ed2
Enjoy living in your fantasy world. Or better yet - pick a law and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 23 14:52:08
+ 2010 ---
I am against any and all government intrusions into the private sector,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 31 20:57:21
+ 2010 ---
@cornouws
The icon pack is most certainly *not* a 'reasonable solution'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 31 20:59:12
+ 2010 ---
Oh - and that said, thanks and kudos to tommy27 and anyone else who
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 11:32:10
+ 2010 ---
@sweigel said:
But sorry: by definition this is *not* a defect, because
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 11:40:56
+ 2010 ---
@cornouws ssid:
Hi guys,
Additional comments on how important this issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 15 18:59:33
+ 2010 ---
In my opinion it should be a stopper for 3.2.2 release, but when I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 15 19:02:00
+ 2010 ---
By the way...
Whoever is the Bug Opener for this bug - please change the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 11:36:26
+ 2010 ---
@kongnan
Like I said - it is *not* a physical impossibility, it is purely
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 5 19:09:37
+ 2010 ---
@cornouws
No offense, and this isn't aimed at you, it is aimed at the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Sat Jun 12 14:56:05
+ 2010 ---
It is far more important to get the colors back than the get the ODF stamp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 11 11:56:18
+ 2010 ---
@cornouws
Well, since there has actually been a major change in that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 10 20:57:55
+ 2010 ---
@cornouws
It is honestly hard to trust it will be fixed, considering the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 10 19:24:38
+ 2010 ---
I like them prowler, and would vote to hire you to do the rest, post links
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 10 20:16:55
+ 2010 ---
I like this one too... but honestly, I'd like anything better than the bw
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112256
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 9 20:35:33
+ 2010 ---
I have seen the same problem, but since I have been forbidden from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 7 17:44:16
+ 2010 ---
2 things:
1. I really like the new *patterns* on the new icons.
2. The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7180
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 26 19:38:10
+ 2010 ---
How is this 'fixed'? I don't see 'Insert cut/copied cells' in any context
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 28 14:17:13
+ 2009 ---
I see the status of this was just changed to Whiteboard...
If this means
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 2 14:35:31
+ 2009 ---
So does this mean that this feature will definitely be available in 3.2?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
--- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 13 15:01:25
+ 2009 ---
Ok, this problem just bit me again after a major editing session on some of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 21 11:20:33 +
2008 ---
I absolutely agree that data loss should never happen, and at worst, if a
condition
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 8 12:07:17 +
2008 ---
Now OOo will automatically take over the MSO file extensions in case no
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 7 19:59:40 +
2008 ---
Ok, I just installed 3.0rc4, and now even the ability to associate Microsoft
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 9 18:46:24 +
2008 ---
Personally, I see no reason to reinvent the wheel.
How does the evil alternative
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 19:48:34 +
2008 ---
Maybe another option would be a separate utility?
Please?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 28 14:40:44 +
2008 ---
@tanstaafl: you should get acquainted with the release schedule
(see http
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 26 12:33:57 +
2008 ---
3.1?! What about 3.0??
The patch already exists, so if this isn't in 3.0, then I'm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 2 13:05:57 +
2008 ---
Since the target milestone is 3.x, why would you bother reporting that it
doesn't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 12:34:33 +
2008 ---
Has there been any progress on fixing this issue? I'm just curious, because it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 12:34:25 +
2008 ---
Has there been any progress on fising this issue? I'm just curious, because it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 12:24:59 +
2008 ---
Wow, this is great that this will finally be possible. This is one of the most
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 23 19:42:54 +
2007 ---
You must have missed my prior comment...
THE REPAIR OFTEN FAILS. PERIOD.
Also,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 11:34:33 +
2007 ---
Hello, and thanks for taking the time to consider my comments...
The 'File
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 19:27:14 +
2007 ---
Repair did not work...
There is absolutely no reason why OOo should not be able
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 21:34:28 +
2007 ---
Why not? That is a silly statement, anyway - the Multi-User Installer *itself*
Assigned to|of
Reported by|tanstaafl
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 11 18:43:20 +
2007 ---
Hello,
I know that there have been a few discussions about this, and that some people
have strong feelings that this is something that OOo should
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 11 18:44:32 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45056)
Screenshot example of simple File Association
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 13:04:27 +
2007 ---
Are there any plans on implementing this? I cannot believe this issue has been
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70626
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 06:17:38 -0700
2006 ---
You should always upload them here so they are part of the issue - what if some
|editing
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|tanstaafl
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 06:56:54 -0700
2006 ---
This is a strange one...
The issue is, once the bug is triggered, whenever you initiate the prompt for
Input Fields (either using 'ctrl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 09:19:48 -0700
2006 ---
Wow!
Now, what is the easiest way for me to test this? Will the next developer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 14:08:54 -0700
2006 ---
I hadn't noticed this issue... although I agree it would be nice if the cursor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 08:25:14 -0700
2006 ---
WHAT?!?!?!?!?!
Please, PLEASE don't put off fixing this GLARING defect until 2.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 10:54:10 -0700
2006 ---
My apologies for 'crying' here... but if you only knew how hard this hit us...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 10:55:00 -0700
2006 ---
And by the way - thanks for pushing for this and retargeting to 2.1 - I hope it
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 06:06:37 -0700
2006 ---
Actually, with a document created by Word 2003, I can't get the statistics to
show
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 06:48:16 -0700
2006 ---
According to the Document Properties in Word 2003, both of these files were
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 2 03:08:58 -0700
2006 ---
Ack! 2.1 ?!
I really cannot imagine that this is that big of a deal to fix, since
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 2 04:41:06 -0700
2006 ---
Not as sad as I was when I didn't know when 2.1 was due for release. I guess I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 2 13:35:43 -0700
2006 ---
To fs: It is not just a focus issue...
The cursor is about half-way down the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 30 09:18:49 -0700
2006 ---
Bummer... oh well, thanks anyway for the support - maybe you could add a vote or
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
User tanstaafl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 30 10:46:40 -0700
2006 ---
Sorry, guess I should have done that immediately, but it is so easy to duplicate
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 30 13:55:35 -0700
2006 ---
Interesting - so apparently it is a Windows only bug.
I have confirmed this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 10:43:38 -0700
2006 ---
I'm very disappointed... this bug isn't even marked as confirmed, much less
fixed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 13:25:18 -0700
2006 ---
Many, many thanks!!
I'm very glad to hear that someone is going to be looking at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 03:34:12 -0700
2006 ---
I'm confused... I saw a mention that this existed somewhere in 2.0.3, but I
don't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 03:39:33 -0700
2006 ---
Well, that didn't work too well - why can I not post hyperlinks in these issues?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 20 07:47:56 -0700
2006 ---
Confirmed here too...
This is a pretty inconvenient one too. I didn't catch this
73 matches
Mail list logo
