To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from vladimir_hiteksch...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 8
07:13:23 + 2009 ---
As to Issue 92782 problems still exist. I considered second
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from vladimir_hiteksch...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 8
07:14:21 + 2009 ---
I consider master version OOo-dev 3.1 .0 (OOO310m9 Build:9396)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from vladimir_hiteksch...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 8
07:15:45 + 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61447)
'n' is missed while creation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from vladimir_hiteksch...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 8
07:17:04 + 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61448)
error while creating two
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 3 08:54:34 +
2008 ---
fs-gld199: Once the CWS dba31d is integrated (you can monitor this here:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
User oj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
User oj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 24 12:54:51 +
2008 ---
FYI - assuming I am following this correctly.
Using OOO300 m_3 under Linux today
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 24 21:13:57 +
2008 ---
atjensen, I see what you mean. I can actually get it to work one way now you've
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 08:58:20 +
2008 ---
Okay, I see multiple problems here. For one, we seem to have a problem with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 09:34:12 +
2008 ---
Ah ... now that I played more with it ...
I planned to submit all follow-up issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 09:35:10 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=55941)
document to reproduce the bug case
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 09:40:05 +
2008 ---
For completeness:
- I also submitted issue 93020, since I think the effect
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 19:58:22 +
2008 ---
fs, thank you very much for the work you're putting in here.
I will re-read your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
User clu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
User clu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 14 14:57:24 +
2008 ---
Using the test doc I am unable to reproduce this problem HOWEVER this is using
XP
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
Issue #|92782
Summary|can set multiple relationships between two tables but
|only one is actually saved
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 13 22:58:42 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=55758)
only one 1-n relationship can actually be saved
21 matches
Mail list logo