To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 07:25:07 +
2007 ---
I think you are right!
I modified the function SwTableBox::IsValidNumTxtNd(..) as y
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 07:20:36 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45707)
the patch file
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 1 03:36:55 +
2007 ---
I think the table node check is valuable.
If the cell contains:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 1 03:23:27 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45568)
the patch file
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 15:05:48 +
2007 ---
I have to construct more complex cases to break your code ;-)
Sections could be nes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 03:02:55 +
2007 ---
According to your suggestion, I modified the patch file.
I change the table node ch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 02:48:52 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45544)
the patch file
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 10:14:29 +
2007 ---
Yes, you're absolutely right.
One situation is not covered by your patch: If a cell
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 02:45:09 +
2007 ---
I think I understand. If the cell only contains a section, its number format
can b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 02:31:03 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45502)
the patch file
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 29 10:25:35 +
2007 ---
I have attached a modified bug document.
When you select the complete table and set
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 29 09:59:38 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45483)
Colored bug document
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User liutao changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User pj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Ot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 28 04:52:56 +
2007 ---
Hi ama, as your suggestion in the issue 77648, I have fixed this issue. I add a
ch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 28 04:45:08 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45452)
The patch file
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User cornouws changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 12:44:31 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45291)
Bug document
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
Issue #|77649
Summary|Writer: Change of number format in table cells inconsi
|stent
Component|Word process
26 matches
Mail list logo
