:|
Keywords:|
Resolution:|
Issue type:|DEFECT
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|scripting
Assigned to:|npower
Reported by:|mux2005
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:39:18
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:46:36 -0700
2005 ---
Another problem with 2 modules whose names differ in case: If I create module
FOO
:|definition
Assigned to:|mi
Reported by:|mux2005
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 03:20:48 -0700
2005 ---
There is no IDL description of service com.sun.star.script.BasicIDE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55168
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent:|ui
Assigned to:|tm
Reported by:|mux2005
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 00:46:26 -0700
2005 ---
If you deregister /SERVICES/com.sun.star.script.BasicIDE and/or
/IMPLEMENTATIONS/com.sun.star.comp.basic.BasicIDE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88623
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 26 14:01:14
+ 2009 ---
I see this under Linux, too. OS should be All.
Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 15 11:48:37
+ 2009 ---
The attached document opens fine with OOo versions 3.2. OOo 3.2 complains that
the document is corrupted. If you say Yes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107688
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 15 11:49:23
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=66646)
Opens fine in versions 3.2. Complete data
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107688
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|tm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 17 10:32:28
+ 2009 ---
The following does not work reliably
{ swriter macro:d } ; swriter foo.odt
Sometimes nothing happens (i.e. foo.odt is not opened). If I introduce
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95369
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 18 07:07:11
+ 2009 ---
@es:
Yes, I can reproduce the crash with m8 exactly as described. The URL of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95369
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92147
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 11 08:55:47
+ 2009 ---
@is: Could you provide a patch for 3.0.1 or replacement files that I can drop
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2987
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
|P2
Subcomponent|programming
Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 19 17:30:19
+ 2009 ---
Steps to reproduce:
0. Open the attached document (macros must be enabled)
1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 19 17:31:32
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61055)
File with macro demonstrating the issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 14:18:54
+ 2009 ---
@mod: What do you mean by new note ? The note in the example document has
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 14:26:59
+ 2009 ---
We've checked it again on Win 2000 and Win XP and the key is not written.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 14:31:38
+ 2009 ---
I see. Yes that may be a feasible workaround. We'll have to see if that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 17:11:00
+ 2009 ---
Since the bootstrap code distributed with the SDK requires this key, OOo-Dev
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 17:16:24
+ 2009 ---
@is: That parameter will probably solve our problem. We'll have to see if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 18:35:22
+ 2009 ---
@mod: Can you provide a patch that I can backport to 3.0.1?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 26 13:33:51
+ 2010 ---
Even better from a usability standpoint would be for the wizard to present
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|printing
Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 17 11:13:36
+ 2010 ---
When attempting to print the document ba.odt from issue #96281
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110185
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 17 11:14:08
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=68388)
Backtrace of crash
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110185
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 17 11:14:47
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=68389)
Valgrind log of crash run
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108953
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 19 08:12:23
+ 2010 ---
It seems that at the moment there is no good workaround for this issue.
Assigned to|rene
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 19 08:10:17
+ 2010 ---
I wanted to build with --disable-mozilla to avoid issue #108953, but when
testing the resulting build I found that the Macro Security... button
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110185
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 1 14:09:38
+ 2010 ---
@mod: Which one do you want me to test? 320_m14 or 300_m74?
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 7 08:34:41
+ 2010 ---
Building fails when you configure with --disable-vba. The problem seems to be
that the makefile.mk files in the vbahelper/ subdirectory don't test for
ENABLE_VBA. The error
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110665
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 7 08:38:56
+ 2010 ---
When you add the ENABLE_VBA guards to the vbahelper module there is another
|P3
Subcomponent|ui
Assigned to|tm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 7 06:07:52
+ 2009 ---
The Tools/Options/Internet/Proxy UI does not allow setting No proxy for when
the proxy is set to System
Assigned to|tm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 7 07:27:09
+ 2009 ---
Steps to reproduce:
1. unopkg add --shared proxyoffdoesntwork.uno.pkg
2. Remove test user's .openoffice.org directory
3. Launch soffice
4. Check
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104076
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 7 07:28:16
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64004)
Extension for testing the issue. Use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95624
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent|scripting
Assigned to|ab
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 27 15:53:41
+ 2009 ---
It appears that when an OnNew event handler (or as in the case of the test
document an autostart macro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104556
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 27 15:55:36
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64414)
Open the attached document (macros must be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104695
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:05:31
+ 2009 ---
What's the status of this issue? This is affecting our WollMux extension,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:12:34
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64773)
Open attachment, allow macros, press
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:52:10
+ 2009 ---
The problem seems to occur only if a Java extension is installed. If I run
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103772
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 07:33:38
+ 2009 ---
If in a thread you call code that has requirements on the context class
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 17 09:19:51
+ 2009 ---
Please reconsider the removal of the classloader setting code. The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 13:20:43
+ 2009 ---
@oj: If I understand you correctly, in the use case you describe a new
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 16:31:45
+ 2009 ---
I don't think the world will ever be cleaned up. New incorrect uses of the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 22 10:58:02
+ 2009 ---
@sb: I would think that the classloader set by OOo so far wasn't arbitrary.
Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 10:12:31
+ 2009 ---
1. Open writer
2. File/Templates/Edit...
3. Open the attached file test.ott
4. Take note that the file has an annotation
5. Change something
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 10:13:49
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64927)
Open for template editing. Touch. Save.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 10:18:41
+ 2009 ---
Also happens when you simply use the template, i.e. Open it so that you get
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 11:42:55
+ 2009 ---
As this is a regression causing data loss, I think it should be a release
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 16:33:01
+ 2009 ---
=
Building module oovbaapi
=
/ooo/build-ooo/src-3.2_m61/trunk/oovbaapi/genconstidl
mkout -- version: 1.8
not building vba...
/ooo/build-ooo/src
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 16:42:30
+ 2009 ---
The build issue is present in m60 and m61. It was not present in m59.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 17:01:36
+ 2009 ---
I repeat my question: Why is a regression that causes data loss not a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 17:02:59
+ 2009 ---
I think issue 105322 should be a release blocker. It is a regression causing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 8 13:27:41
+ 2009 ---
Yes. The problem seems to be fixed in m60.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 06:02:41
+ 2009 ---
Looking at the diff between m59 and m60, it is clear that the 2nd ENDIF that
Assigned to|mh
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 07:59:11
+ 2009 ---
The binaries such as idlc in the Debian archive ooobasis3.2-sdk...deb lack the
executable bit:
-rw-r--r-- root/root318400 2009-10-08 23:13
./opt
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105752
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105752
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 10:47:43
+ 2009 ---
Sorry, I confused the issue number. The patch is for another issue.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 12:10:02
+ 2009 ---
OOo crashes whenever I attempt to open the attached template. This issue has
already been present in at least m60. I don't know how far back
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 12:11:06
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=65340)
Crashes OOo when opening
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 12:14:41
+ 2009 ---
To avoid misunderstanding: I'm not saying the document works with go-oo.org
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 15:59:38
+ 2009 ---
My builds do not produce crash reports for policy reasons. Issue 105520 says
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 14 08:37:43
+ 2009 ---
@mru: I've built fwk122 and indeed the crash is not reproducible with that
Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 09:27:45
+ 2009 ---
The attached document has an InputUser textfield (inserted manually via the
GUI). The textfield's XDependentTextField.getTextFieldMaster
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105921
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 09:28:48
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=65382)
test macro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105382
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
|programming
Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 16 05:53:04
+ 2009 ---
Currently, when a mail merge is performed, all the usual events such as OnCreate
are broadcast via
Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 15:09:33
+ 2009 ---
If you click the button in the attached document, OOo will consume all CPU and
memory. Depending on your system you may need
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106226
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 15:10:41
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=65561)
Press button and kiss your system goodbye
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 15:59:36
+ 2009 ---
I nominate issue 106151 as a blocker. It's a regression that may break a lot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5658
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri May 22 10:05:03
+ 2009 ---
How about implementing the following things:
1. If the user enters a formula
Assigned to|spreadsheet
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:20:16
+ 2009 ---
As the attached test document and screenshots demonstrate, line breaks within
cells differ between Windows (2000 in this case) and Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102293
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:21:28
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=62571)
Test document: The cell's line break
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102293
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:22:01
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=62572)
Screen shot from Windows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102293
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:22:24
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=62573)
Screeen shot from Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|tm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 31 14:01:42
+ 2009 ---
Steps to reproduce:
1. Launch OpenOffice.org
2. Start the attached program:
java -jar ShortcutPersistenceBug.jar
3. OpenOffice.org crashes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100718
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 31 14:02:42
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61316)
Launch the JAR file to crash your OOo 3.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100718
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 1 17:09:12
+ 2009 ---
Yes, seems to be fixed.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100718
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 2 13:03:11
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61363)
To make this easier to confirm I've put the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100878
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 8 06:45:13
+ 2009 ---
This issue may be a duplicate of #100744
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100744
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|jsc
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 21 15:36:31
+ 2009 ---
The button in the test document executes the simple macro
Sub Main
range = ThisComponent.Bookmarks.getByName
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101249
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 21 15:37:36
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61710)
Press button to demonstrate bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 23 12:25:25
+ 2009 ---
@hi: Where is the sense in closing an OLDER issue as duplicate of a NEWER
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
