On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Robert Robinson wrote:
> This is a re-post. We are still interested to know if work is planned to
> implement digital I/O support for the M-Audio Audiophile 2496. Analog I/O
> works fine with ALSA.
Note that support for digital I/O is in the driver. You may reach a small
bug
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> ALSA on CVS doesn't compile. alsa-driver/include/adriver.h has several
> problems:
>
> /usr/local/src/alsa/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h:186: parse error before
> `dir'
> /usr/local/src/alsa/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h:188: multiple stor
Hi,
I was wondering for the example xrun_recovery function:
http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/alsa-lib/_2test_2pcm_8c-example.html#a15
In the ESTRPIPE case, it repeats to resume until it does not return EAGAIN
anymore. Then it calls snd_pcm_prepare only if snd_pcm_resume returned a
negative
This is a re-post. We are still interested to know if work is planned to
implement digital I/O support for the M-Audio Audiophile 2496. Analog I/O
works fine with ALSA.
Thank you.
Robbie
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
Hello!
ALSA on CVS doesn't compile. alsa-driver/include/adriver.h has several
problems:
/usr/local/src/alsa/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h:186: parse error before
`dir'
/usr/local/src/alsa/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h:188: multiple storage
classes in declaration of `devfs_find_and_unregister
Matthias Saou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All this will get so much easier once stable kernels used by Linux
> distributions come with ALSA by default ;-)
suse & mandrake come with alsa in their kernel, debian has a package,
rh doesn't
since linus posts on klm seems to indicate we'll have a n
Matthias Saou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All this will get so much easier once stable kernels used by Linux
> distributions come with ALSA by default ;-)
Sure will.
Providing we stay focused on maintaining binary compatibility... :-)
--
Jack O'Quin
Austin, Texas, USA
http://www.ste
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
[snip]
> ALSA tree was fully synced with kernel yesterday. Not all changes are in
> 2.5.40. Please, wait for 2.5.41 or get the kernel sources from BitKeeper
> repository of 2.5.
>
> Jaroslav
Takas
Once upon a time, Thierry wrote :
> since it must be rebuild for each kernel, we integrated in our kernel
> package (first as a separate tarball with configure/make/..., now we
> untar it under sound in kernel linux sources and apply a few patches
> to config.in so that there's one make to run)
Matthias Saou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've managed to work something out for Red Hat Linux that should be
> easily portable to Mandrake I guess (then again, they already have
> ALSA 0.5.x built in, is that what I understood from the last few
> mails??).
yep, we shipped alsa-0.5.x for quite
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:17:10 +0200,
> Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
>>Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
2) i recently compiled rc3 on a mandrake 8.2 system. everything
went smoothly. when i went to modprobe, i got messages suggesting
to me that t
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > ALSA tree was fully synced with kernel yesterday. Not all changes are in
> > 2.5.40. Please, wait for 2.5.41 or get the kernel sources from BitKeeper
> > repository of 2.5.
> >
> >
Once upon a time, Takashi wrote :
> the problem is that many different kernel binaries are built using the
> same kernel tree, i.e. there are many different kernel configs while
> there is only one kernel-source package.
> thus you have to adjust the kernel config by yourself anyway.
>
> in case
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
[snip]
>
> ALSA tree was fully synced with kernel yesterday. Not all changes are in
> 2.5.40. Please, wait for 2.5.41 or get the kernel sources from BitKeeper
> repository of 2.5.
>
> Jaroslav
>
J
> >> i have a bit of a problem with all of this. why doesn't ALSA build
> >> "out of the box"? the description you've given of what is necessary
> >> to get this to work seems (for the most part) to be a bit
> >> ridiculous.
> >
> >insulting people that take time to answer you has always been a
>
Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> its just that my experience of using ALSA for several years when
> built with a kernel from kernel.org has been that i just type:
>
> cd .../alsa-cvs/alsa-{driver,lib,utils}
> then
> cvscompile
> or
> ./configure && make && make install
>
>
--- Begin Message ---
[ the usual forward request for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>> i have a bit of a problem with all of this. why doesn't ALSA build
>> "out of the box"? the description you've given of what is necessary
>> to get this to work seems (for the most part) to be a bit
>> ridiculous.
>
>
--- Begin Message ---
[ please forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>While at this issue, is it possible to compile everything from CVS without
>intermediate installs? I mean, compile alsa-lib against the headers of
>alsa-driver in CVS and alsa-util against alsa-lib in CVS. If it's
>possible, pleas
Hi,
At Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:46:52 -0400 (EDT),
Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I haven't done any development for sound in the userspace, so don't put
> too much weight into my words, but for what it's worth ...
>
> > i'd like to rewrite configure for alsa-utils and alsa-tools to use
> > pkg-
Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > hum, mdk9.0 is compiled with module versionning and we've no
> > problems (i mean there're bugs but not such problems)
>
> this is 8.2 ...
this means that we compile rc3 with versionning symbols without
problems, so this answer takashi fear
> i have a
Hello!
I haven't done any development for sound in the userspace, so don't put
too much weight into my words, but for what it's worth ...
> i'd like to rewrite configure for alsa-utils and alsa-tools to use
> pkg-config for alsa-lib. you might have found alsa.pc already in
> alsa-lib. the only
At Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:37:35 +0200,
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > 4) note that if you boot with a kernel with alsa-0.9.0, all your
> > >alsa apps won't work unless you use them in oss emulation mode.
> >
> > why? is there any incompatibility?
At Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:42:32 -0700 (PDT),
Fedor G. Pikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the right interface and altset (I was capturing with -r 96000 -f
> S16_LE). Two more files from proc about this pcm:
> pcm0c/sub0/hw_params
> access: RW_INTERLEAVED
> format: S16_LE
> subformat: STD
>
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 4) note that if you boot with a kernel with alsa-0.9.0, all your
> >alsa apps won't work unless you use them in oss emulation mode.
>
> why? is there any incompatibility?
i presume you joke ?
remember the incompatible apis of alsa-0.5.x and als
At Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:56:17 +0200 (CEST),
Wolfgang Hamann wrote:
>
>
> >> At Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:31:49 +0200 (CEST),
> >> Wolfgang Hamann wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > thanks for your reply - unfortunately it did not work, although the port and
>irq could be
> >> > configured in the
Hi,
At Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:17:10 +0200,
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > 2) i recently compiled rc3 on a mandrake 8.2 system. everything
> > > went smoothly. when i went to modprobe, i got messages suggesting
> > > to me that there a mismatch between t
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2) i recently compiled rc3 on a mandrake 8.2 system. everything
> > went smoothly. when i went to modprobe, i got messages suggesting
> > to me that there a mismatch between the kernels and the ALSA
> > modules with respect to symbol versioning. (sever
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was wondering when we can expect an update to ALSA in the kernel source
> > - we're still on -rc2, aren't we? Now that 2.5.x is getting a little
> > more useable, I'd like to st
Hi Paul,
At Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:57:57 -0400,
Paul Davis wrote:
>
> takashi - i can't post to alsa-devel at the moment (my ISP and sf.net
> have messed up their configuration somehow).
oh it's bad...
> i tried sending these via
> jaroslav, but i got no reply whatsoever and they never showed up o
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 02 Oct 2002 13:25:00 +0200,
> Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> >
> > Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > * via8233 --> fixed
> > > no problems now (on cvs it's merged together with via686 as
> > > snd-via82xx driver)
> >
> > i got r
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > i got reports saying via686 produce "digital noise" since we
> > switched from alsa-0.9.0 rc2 to rc3
>
> drivers for via chip were merged now to snd-via82xx, and many fixes
> have been done on it. please check the cvs version.
that's what i said to t
At Wed, 02 Oct 2002 13:25:00 +0200,
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * via8233 --> fixed
> > no problems now (on cvs it's merged together with via686 as
> > snd-via82xx driver)
>
> i got reports saying via686 produce "digital noise" since we switche
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * via8233 --> fixed
> no problems now (on cvs it's merged together with via686 as
> snd-via82xx driver)
i got reports saying via686 produce "digital noise" since we switched
from alsa-0.9.0 rc2 to rc3
Hi,
i'd like to rewrite configure for alsa-utils and alsa-tools to use
pkg-config for alsa-lib. you might have found alsa.pc already in
alsa-lib.
the only concern is that pkg-config is unlikely installed as a
standard tool in most distributions. but surely pkg-config is the
right way to go.
al
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering when we can expect an update to ALSA in the kernel source -
> we're still on -rc2, aren't we? Now that 2.5.x is getting a little more
> useable, I'd like to start running it again (I stopped at 2.5.25 as it really
> did b
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:17, I wrote:
[SNIP]
> I'm currently compiling 2.5.40 with _no sound_. However, for some reason,
> make modules_install comes back with:
Uh, not quite true -- the config bug fooled me. I'd actually config'd ALSA in
with oss-emulation.
-- Peter
---
Hi all,
I was wondering when we can expect an update to ALSA in the kernel source -
we're still on -rc2, aren't we? Now that 2.5.x is getting a little more
useable, I'd like to start running it again (I stopped at 2.5.25 as it really
did become too dangerous). But I want ALSA :-)
I'm curren
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> Hello
> It would be nice if there was a feature in alsa that would let the user
> tell alsa which speakers are plugged into which sound card sockets.
> E.g. On sound card 0, I have: -
> Left speaker in Stereo Jack 1-Left
> Right speaker in Stere
Once upon a time, James wrote :
> I am currently helping to write a media application in linux that plays
> DVDs that have 5.1(e.g 6 channels) audio tracks.
Doesn't ogle already allow that?
http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/groups/dvd/
> It would be nice if my
> audio application did not have to ca
Hello
It would be nice if there was a feature in alsa that would let the user
tell alsa which speakers are plugged into which sound card sockets.
E.g. On sound card 0, I have: -
Left speaker in Stereo Jack 1-Left
Right speaker in Stereo Jack 1-Right
Rear Left in Stereo Jack 2 - Left
Rear Right in
40 matches
Mail list logo
