At Wed, 24 Apr 2002 03:06:33 -0600,
Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>
> On April 24, 2002 02:52 am, you wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> >
> > At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:43:43 -0600,
> >
> > Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > One: SND_RAWMIDI_SYNC isn't a valid flag for snd_rawmidi_open.
> > > ( rawmidi_hw.c:221: sn
On April 24, 2002 03:06 am, you wrote:
> On April 24, 2002 02:52 am, you wrote:
[snip]
> > > Three: after a while, about a minute or so of playing a midi, the midi
> > > starts getting slower and slower.. and CPU usage goes to 0... I'm sure
> > > Its not the midi player, as I've tried it's 'DIGIMI
On April 24, 2002 02:52 am, you wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
> At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:43:43 -0600,
>
> Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > One: SND_RAWMIDI_SYNC isn't a valid flag for snd_rawmidi_open.
> > ( rawmidi_hw.c:221: snd_rawmidi_hw_open: Assertion `!(mode &
> > ~(0x0001|0x0002))' failed.)
>
> fixed.
Hi Thomas,
At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:43:43 -0600,
Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>
> One: SND_RAWMIDI_SYNC isn't a valid flag for snd_rawmidi_open.
> ( rawmidi_hw.c:221: snd_rawmidi_hw_open: Assertion `!(mode &
> ~(0x0001|0x0002))' failed.)
fixed.
> Two: using SND_RAWMIDI_APPEND on snd_rawmidi_open
On April 23, 2002 05:44 am, you wrote:
> At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:14:42 +0200,
>
> I wrote:
> > At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:50:27 -0600,
> >
> > Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interface
> > > (using my SBLive! Value), I tried, some code written b
On April 23, 2002 05:44 am, you wrote:
> At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:14:42 +0200,
>
> I wrote:
> > At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:50:27 -0600,
> >
> > Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interface
> > > (using my SBLive! Value), I tried, some code written b
At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:14:42 +0200,
I wrote:
>
> At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:50:27 -0600,
> Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> >
> > I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interface (using
> > my SBLive! Value), I tried, some code written by me, and the rawmidi.c source
> > demo that is
At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:50:27 -0600,
Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>
> I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interface (using
> my SBLive! Value), I tried, some code written by me, and the rawmidi.c source
> demo that is included with the driver package. (A sound font is loaded,
Hi Juan,
At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:12:57 -0300,
Juan Linietsky wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:07:59 +0200
> Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > however i don't understand quite well the situation from your posts.
> > could you elaborate the symptom?
> > which program and how did you t
On April 23, 2002 12:54 am, you wrote:
> Last time I tried, rawmidi worked for me, on hw:0,1
> You shouldn't need the snd-virmidi device, just the
> snd-emu10k1 will do. Exactly what version of alsa-driver
> are you using?
0.9.0beta12
> Anyway, because playing through the sequencer _does_ work,
Last time I tried, rawmidi worked for me, on hw:0,1
You shouldn't need the snd-virmidi device, just the
snd-emu10k1 will do. Exactly what version of alsa-driver
are you using?
Anyway, because playing through the sequencer _does_ work,
you could indeed load the snd-virmidi device as well,
use acon
On April 22, 2002 05:33 pm, you wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 04:54:53PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > No activity. And no virmidi devices... lsmod shows that the virmidi
> > module is loaded...
>
> Well there ends my knowledge.
Thanks for the help so far. :)
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
[EMAI
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 04:54:53PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> No activity. And no virmidi devices... lsmod shows that the virmidi module is
> loaded...
Well there ends my knowledge.
--
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
_
On April 22, 2002 03:55 pm, you wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:35:08PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > On April 22, 2002 03:27 pm, you wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:50:27PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > > I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interfa
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:35:08PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On April 22, 2002 03:27 pm, you wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:50:27PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interface
> > > (using my SBLive! Value), I tried, som
On April 22, 2002 03:27 pm, you wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:50:27PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interface
> > (using my SBLive! Value), I tried, some code written by me, and the
> > rawmidi.c source demo that is included wi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:50:27PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> I don't hear any sound when playing midi using the rawmidi interface (using
> my SBLive! Value), I tried, some code written by me, and the rawmidi.c source
> demo that is included with the driver package. (A sound font is loade
On April 22, 2002 08:12 am, you wrote:
> >> and testing a few changes), so it'll be clear that the API is finished
> >> and code is working.
> >
> >It is? Last time I tried using Rawmidi on an emu10k1 chip I got no sound.
> > I had a soundfont loaded, and tried with my own code and the rawmidi dem
On April 22, 2002 10:07 am, you wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:49:41 -0600,
>
> Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > On April 22, 2002 05:10 am, you wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> > > > I can add something but what is the official view from Jaroslav?
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:07:59 +0200
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> however i don't understand quite well the situation from your posts.
> could you elaborate the symptom?
> which program and how did you test?
>
>
> Takashi
Hello!
Actually, if you dont mind i have some questions to a
Hi Thomas,
At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:49:41 -0600,
Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
>
> On April 22, 2002 05:10 am, you wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> > > I can add something but what is the official view from Jaroslav?
> >
> > 0.5.x release is no longer supported from the develope
>> and testing a few changes), so it'll be clear that the API is finished and
>> code is working.
>
>It is? Last time I tried using Rawmidi on an emu10k1 chip I got no sound. I
>had a soundfont loaded, and tried with my own code and the rawmidi demo
>source. Midi would play with the pmidi progra
On April 22, 2002 05:10 am, you wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> > I can add something but what is the official view from Jaroslav?
>
> 0.5.x release is no longer supported from the developer perspective. All
> our focus is in 0.9.x codebase. I'll release 0.9.0rc1 ASAP (after
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> I can add something but what is the official view from Jaroslav?
0.5.x release is no longer supported from the developer perspective. All
our focus is in 0.9.x codebase. I'll release 0.9.0rc1 ASAP (after fixing
and testing a few changes), so it'll b
--- James Courtier-Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>
>Currently, xine (http://xine.sf.net) supports the 0.9.x alsa interface
>but not the 0.5.x interface.
>I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
>applications which support different alsa versions.
>
>Cheers
>Ja
I can add something but what is the official view from Jaroslav?
--
Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd
For the discerning hardware connoisseur
Http://www.boosthardware.com
Http://www.boosthardware.com/LAU/Linux_Audio_Users_Guide/
--- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Patr
Hi,
At Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:32:07 +0200,
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
> Fred Gleason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be
> > > frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into
> > > thinking that 0.5 is the "safer" option.
Here's what you get for leaving off the smiley -- until such time as
software has fewer bugs than the hardware, the following is a cheap
shot. -BobC
if that's the stable release, people should be using kernel 1.2 on
an 8086 (as everyone knows, that's the stable release of the
pentium).
Fred Gleason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be
> > frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into
> > thinking that 0.5 is the "safer" option.
>
> My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's
>
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
>James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>
>
><...>
>
>
>>I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
>>applications which support different alsa versions.
>>
>>
>>
>
>N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
>trace of alsa
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, James Tappin wrote:
> Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be frightened off
> by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into thinking that 0.5 is
> the "safer" option.
My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's
starting
On Thursday 18 April 2002 18:27, Fred Gleason wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> > N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
> > trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ?
>
> I'd like to add my vote for this here too. The whole 0.5.x vs. 0.9.x
> thing is
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
> trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ?
I'd like to add my vote for this here too. The whole 0.5.x vs. 0.9.x
thing is *hugely* confusing -- to me, to programmers, and to end users.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:18:51 +0200
Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> >
> <...>
> > I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
> > applications which support different alsa versions.
> >
>
> N. could we please please ple
nice,
mplayer has also alsa9 and alsa5 plugins.
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> I have now migrated the new ALSA homepage. It was redesigned to be more user
>friendly.
>
> http://www.alsa-project.org
>
> I will now add new links to the native applications page.
>
> So far I have:
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>
<...>
> I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
> applications which support different alsa versions.
>
N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ?
if that's the stable release,
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>Hi Patrick,
>
>Thanks for doing this.
>
>The new page doesn't say anything about using the 0.9.x version rather
>than 0.5.x. Is it possible to have the main page make it clear that
>0.9.0beta12 is the version new users and developers should start with?
>
>-Eric Rz.
>
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for doing this.
The new page doesn't say anything about using the 0.9.x version rather
than 0.5.x. Is it possible to have the main page make it clear that
0.9.0beta12 is the version new users and developers should start with?
-Eric Rz.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
> I have now
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> I have now migrated the new ALSA homepage. It was redesigned to be more user
>friendly.
Excellent!
> I will now add new links to the native applications page.
[...]
> Are these correct and are there any others?
GStreamer has an alsa 0.9 plugin, fw
Hello Patrick,
Looks very nice.
Am I correctly assuming that you will be the maintainer of the ALSA pages
from now on?
Could you add the following alsa 0.9 applications I wrote:
http://www.iua.upf.es/~mdeboer/projects/tapiir/
http://www.iua.upf.es/~mdeboer/projects/aconnectgui/
http://www.i
I have now migrated the new ALSA homepage. It was redesigned to be more user friendly.
http://www.alsa-project.org
I will now add new links to the native applications page.
So far I have:
jack
Ardour
TiMidity
Glame
PD
Rosengarden
MusE
Are these correct and are there any others?
--
Patrick
41 matches
Mail list logo
