[...]
> > I suppose this doesn't mention AMT? Can I have this information. It
> > might contain more than what I already have.
>
> the info appeared in another thread (running-status bug on mtpav):
> http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/~sbartels/unitor/unitor8_doc.txt
> the project itself seems dead now
At Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:05:00 +0100,
Martijn Sipkema wrote:
>
> > recently a technical information about emagic unitor8 was revealed,
>
> I suppose this doesn't mention AMT? Can I have this information. It
> might contain more than what I already have.
the info appeared in another thread (runnin
> recently a technical information about emagic unitor8 was revealed,
I suppose this doesn't mention AMT? Can I have this information. It
might contain more than what I already have.
> and it includes a small desription about MTP, too.
> there, the initialization sysex is mentionted, so perhaps t
Hi Allan,
recently a technical information about emagic unitor8 was revealed,
and it includes a small desription about MTP, too.
there, the initialization sysex is mentionted, so perhaps this may
influence on the behavior of the device. (also, the smpte sysex is
described!)
before i start coding
