At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:19:46 +0100,
Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
> Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >
> >> R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any
> >> > impact on CVS
Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>
>> R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any
>> > impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always
>> > build 2.6 from the
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any
> > impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always
> > build 2.6 from the stock tree and then immediately overwrite the
> > so
R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any
> impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always
> build 2.6 from the stock tree and then immediately overwrite the
> sound directory with ALSA CVS.
Those patches do not appl
