On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> The magic web site did not mention anything about an AMP.
The specs do.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
___
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.source
On 18 Feb 2002, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 18:44, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> > A simple 100 Megs Full duplex point to point Ethernet cable can handle just
> > about anything S/PDIF, USB, SCSI, IDE can throw at it.
> I assume you've seen http://magic.gibson.com/?
sadly, magic is pa
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 17:05, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> The magic web site did not mention anything about an AMP.
Magic is just a way to ferry audio data around.. that can be between any
audio devices. The specification document gives a lot more details than
the site and has a few setup exam
The magic web site did not mention anything about an AMP.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Ham
> Sent: 18 February 2002 16:27
> To: James Courtier-Dutton
> Cc: ALSA Development Mailing List
> Subject: R
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 16:26, Bob Ham wrote:
> Has the following specs:
>
> 32 channels @ 44.1 kHz x 32 bits
> 32 channels @ 48 kHz x 32 bits
> 16 channels @ 96 kHz x 32 bits
> 8 channels @ 192 kHz x 32 bits
I should also note that this is full duplex.
--
Bob Ham: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My music: h
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 15:46, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> magic.gibson.com must be stupid not to realise that what we really want is
> an AMP with an Ethernet port
Umm.. this *is* what magic can provide. A guitar with a an ethernet
port, an amp with an ethernet port, a mixer with an ethernet
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 03:00:56 +, Bob Ham wrote:
> > AC3 is much
> > more complicated, and you couldn't feasibly reproduce the encoded output
> > without having followed the spec (unless I'm missing something).
>
> Assuming you haven't signed (or clicked "yes" on) any agreement in order
> t
cabling
as well.
Cheers
James
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Ham
> Sent: 18 February 2002 14:51
> To: James Courtier-Dutton
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Alsa-devel] dolby digital output
>
>
&g
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 14:08, Steve Harris wrote:
> AC3 is much
> more complicated, and you couldn't feasibly reproduce the encoded output
> without having followed the spec (unless I'm missing something).
Assuming you haven't signed (or clicked "yes" on) any agreement in order
to get the spec, I
On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 18:44, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> A simple 100 Megs Full duplex point to point Ethernet cable can handle just
> about anything S/PDIF, USB, SCSI, IDE can throw at it.
I assume you've seen http://magic.gibson.com/?
Bob
--
Bob Ham: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My music: http://m
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:08:12 +, Steve Harris wrote:
> I'm a little dubious about that. It's possible to write a Free pro-logic
> compatible encoder (I have), as most of the technology predates dobly, but
> it can't, legally be 100% compatible for licencing reasons. AC3 is much
> more compl
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 06:09:02 -, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> >From what I understand, we can do ac3 "like" encoders in linux for free, and
> they might actually make sounds come out on Commercial AC3 decoders, but
> unless we pay a license fee, we cannot actually call it AC3.
> This is w
At Sun, 17 Feb 2002 18:47:35 +0100,
Markus Plail wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 18:15:55 +0100 Andy Lo-A-Foe wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:33:32AM -0500, Hod McWuff wrote:
> >
> > > I'd imagine the first step would be to add an ac3 encoder, and then
> > > (possibly) the
> -Original Message-
> From: Hod McWuff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 February 2002 18:21
> To: James Courtier-Dutton
> Subject: RE: [Alsa-devel] dolby digital output
>
>
>
> So, the upshot is that thanks to the AC3 latency spec, even with a
> light
oney
involved.
Cheers
James
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Plail
> Sent: 17 February 2002 17:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] dolby digital output
>
>
> Hi there!
>
> On Sun,
Hi there!
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 18:15:55 +0100 Andy Lo-A-Foe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:33:32AM -0500, Hod McWuff wrote:
>
> > I'd imagine the first step would be to add an ac3 encoder, and then
> > (possibly) the 2->5.1 channel demuxing for stereo streams. This would
> > result in the a
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hod McWuff
> Sent: 17 February 2002 06:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Alsa-devel] dolby digital output
>
>
>
> What would be involved in enabling 5.1-channel spdif output?
>
>
> I'd imagine the first step would be to a
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:33:32AM -0500, Hod McWuff wrote:
> I'd imagine the first step would be to add an ac3 encoder, and then
> (possibly) the 2->5.1 channel demuxing for stereo streams. This would
> result in the ability to mix dolby digital streams (DVD's) with more
> mundane PCM streams, s
What would be involved in enabling 5.1-channel spdif output?
I'd imagine the first step would be to add an ac3 encoder, and then
(possibly) the 2->5.1 channel demuxing for stereo streams. This would
result in the ability to mix dolby digital streams (DVD's) with more
mundane PCM streams, such
19 matches
Mail list logo
