[Alsa-devel] also does not compile if only using module drivers

2002-03-08 Thread bert hubert
With ALSA in kernel 2.5.6 and all sound cards compiled as modules, sound/core/pcm.c & friends are not built into snd-pcm.o and linked into the main kernel, leading to a lot of unresolved symbols. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://www.tk

Re: [Alsa-devel] also does not compile if only using module drivers

2002-03-08 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, bert hubert wrote: > With ALSA in kernel 2.5.6 and all sound cards compiled as modules, > sound/core/pcm.c & friends are not built into snd-pcm.o and linked into the > main kernel, leading to a lot of unresolved symbols. Could you explain your more problem more? I don't see i

Re: [Alsa-devel] also does not compile if only using module drivers

2002-03-08 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:13PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, bert hubert wrote: > > > With ALSA in kernel 2.5.6 and all sound cards compiled as modules, > > sound/core/pcm.c & friends are not built into snd-pcm.o and linked into the > > main kernel, leading to a lot of u

Re: [Alsa-devel] also does not compile if only using module drivers

2002-03-08 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, bert hubert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:13PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, bert hubert wrote: > > > > > With ALSA in kernel 2.5.6 and all sound cards compiled as modules, > > > sound/core/pcm.c & friends are not built into snd-pcm.o and link

[Alsa-devel] Mixer chanel naming

2002-03-08 Thread Kasparek Tomas
Hi, I've just started writing driver for Compaq iPAQ and I'm feel realy dizzy from setting the mixer. Here is part of code: ... static snd_kcontrol_new_t snd_h3600_controls[] = { H3600_SINGLE("Master Playback Switch", H3600_MASTER, 15, 1, 1), H3600_DOUBLE("Master Playback Volume", H3600_MASTER,

[Alsa-devel] hammerfall dsp controls (again)

2002-03-08 Thread Paul Davis
well, since nobody responded to a 100% open question on how to support the 1500 or so mixer controls that exist on the H-DSP, i'll offer up an explicit solution and see if anyone can comment on that. since no generic ALSA program is going to be able to usefully present all those mixer controls, a

Re: [Alsa-devel] hammerfall dsp controls (again)

2002-03-08 Thread Erik Inge Bolsø
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Paul Davis wrote: >well, since nobody responded to a 100% open question on how to support >the 1500 or so mixer controls that exist on the H-DSP, i'll offer up >an explicit solution and see if anyone can comment on that. > >since no generic ALSA program is going to be able to u

Re: [Alsa-devel] Mixer chanel naming

2002-03-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
Hi, At Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:01:30 +0100 (CET), Kasparek Tomas wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just started writing driver for Compaq iPAQ and I'm feel realy dizzy > from setting the mixer. Here is part of code: > > ... > static snd_kcontrol_new_t snd_h3600_controls[] = { > H3600_SINGLE("Master Playback

Re: [Alsa-devel] Mixer chanel naming

2002-03-08 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Kasparek Tomas wrote: > Hi, > > I've just started writing driver for Compaq iPAQ and I'm feel realy dizzy > from setting the mixer. Here is part of code: > > ... > static snd_kcontrol_new_t snd_h3600_controls[] = { > H3600_SINGLE("Master Playback Switch", H3600_MASTER, 15, 1

[Alsa-devel] kernel 2.5.6: devfs could not append to parent

2002-03-08 Thread Duncan Sands
While booting kernel 2.5.6 I get the following error: devfs_register(midi): could not append to parent, err: -17 NB: 0 [card0 ]: CS46xx - Sound Fusion CS46xx Sound Fusion CS46xx at 0xda80/0xda00, irq 5 Duncan. _

Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA vs OSS/free

2002-03-08 Thread Kevin Conder
> > > Kai Vehmanen wrote on Thu, 07 Mar 2002 05:41:34 -0800: > > > > > > Why is ALSA the better alternative? > > > Have I missed some important points? > > > > Kevin Conder wrote: > > > > OSS has one crucial advantage over ALSA: documentation! > > Perhaps one day ALSA will have something

Re: [Alsa-devel] EWS64XL: cs4232 alsa driver is no more workingwith Alsa 0.9.0beta12 and Sam9407 driver , Alsa0.5.x worked fine

2002-03-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Ok, now i tried the CS4236 driver, but i get still the same errors. I think its a bug, something is really messed up. I also tried the old ALSA 0.5.x drivers again but i get the same errors now. It must have something to do with the upgrade from Kernel 2.4.9 to 2.4.18, because now, no

Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA vs OSS/free

2002-03-08 Thread Daniel Caujolle-Bert
Hi, Kevin Conder wrote: > > > > > Kai Vehmanen wrote on Thu, 07 Mar 2002 05:41:34 -0800: > > > > > > > > Why is ALSA the better alternative? > > > > Have I missed some important points? > > > > > > Kevin Conder wrote: > > > > > > OSS has one crucial advantage over ALSA: documentation! >

Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA vs OSS/free

2002-03-08 Thread Martijn Sipkema
> So, i think there's a time to code THEN there a time > to build docs (the doxygen sections in code are oftenly updated). > > This is why i think there is a non-sense in this *advandage* > of OSS here. I don't agree. Good documentation is essential and I see the lack of it as a serious pr