Re: [Alsa-devel] EMU10K1 and the extra voice

2004-06-07 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote: On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 12:40:31PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: Any relationship to the fact that I can only allocate 21 subdevices with ALSA, but 31 with DirectSound? Yes, 64 / 3 = 21 . That stinks (but if it's necessary for decent

Re: [Alsa-devel] EMU10K1 and the extra voice

2004-06-06 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Chris Purnell wrote: For PCM playback the EMU10K1 driver is allocating an extra voice. This is somewhat wastefull and I kind of need all 64 voices. Is appears to be using it to generate the period interrupts. Does anyone know what it would take to rewrite the driver to

Re: [Alsa-devel] EMU10K1 and the extra voice

2004-06-06 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote: On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 12:59:36PM +, Chris Purnell wrote: For PCM playback the EMU10K1 driver is allocating an extra voice. This is somewhat wastefull and I kind of need all 64 voices. Is appears to be using it to generate the period

Re: [Alsa-devel] EMU10K1 and the extra voice

2004-06-06 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 12:40:31PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: Any relationship to the fact that I can only allocate 21 subdevices with ALSA, but 31 with DirectSound? Yes, 64 / 3 = 21 . That stinks (but if it's necessary for decent latency, which it doesn't get in Windows, oh well).

Re: [Alsa-devel] EMU10K1 and the extra voice

2004-06-05 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 12:59:36PM +, Chris Purnell wrote: For PCM playback the EMU10K1 driver is allocating an extra voice. This is somewhat wastefull and I kind of need all 64 voices. Is appears to be using it to generate the period interrupts. Does anyone know what it would take to